Dear Anonymous Male: Here’s My Take On ‘The Beauty Paradox’

Mik from Australia responds to our commenter Anonymous Male on why there is a seeming paradox when it comes to men and women and beauty.

 

EDITOR’S NOTE: Here at The Good Men Project, we’ve had an ongoing series on “Women’s Obsession with Beauty,” with the goal of discovering some truths about how both men and women really feel about beauty. On one of those posts, a commenter who goes by the name of Anonymous Male asked about an apparent paradox. You can read his whole comment here, but in a nutshell: 

On the one hand, men are portrayed as ravenous sexual beings who sleep with anything that moves. On the other, they have totally unrealistic expectations about beauty, wanting only the ‘hot babe’. Paradox?

We asked for responses, and Mik from Australia wrote the following post.

◊ ♦◊♦ ◊

The Beauty Paradox

For as long as women have been viewed by patriarchal societies as possessions, their worth and value have been intrinsically linked to the beauty aesthetic of the era they live in. Ergo, being considered “beautiful” becomes a measure against a fashionable cultural standard that adds to, or subtracts from, the perceived value of the object— i.e. the female in question.

What you may be intuiting—and perhaps, instinctively reacting to—is that some men aspire to “owning” a beautiful woman as another way of competing with and gaining a sense of superiority over other men. A culturally and appropriately “beautiful” woman is presumed to bring caché to a man’s status. She is a “thing,” a toy, a trump card, a piece of bullion.

Women have struggled for centuries against being treated as things or objects and by gosh darn it is a battle! Male privilege is so culturally indoctrinated that many believe this behaviour is biological. (Ask Hugo Schwyzer and he will tell you emphatically, it’s not! It’s cultural).

The dichotomy is that no one female can meet the exacting beauty standard that is set by the cultural norms of its time! The standard is––and always has been––set just beyond the limit of achievability. If the standard were actually reachable, then there would be the claim of ‘Perfection’ and given that most people resist the idea that actual perfection can exist, the beauty standard remains always slightly out of reach.

♦◊♦

For women, buying (literally!) into the beauty standard means trying very hard to match them selves to it. The cost is often much higher than the financial investment, of course. The way we see it is, that if we (I’m generalizing here), hope to achieve the kind of hetero romantic/sexual relationship that meets a whole slew of emotional and psychological capacities, then meeting the beauty standard ostensibly gives us the edge for male attention.

Men instinctively know this about the beauty standard even if they’re barely aware it exists. Many women rail against meeting the standard (it can do our heads in quite frankly!). Some deliberately opt out. Men are capable of understanding that despite any prescribed, but unachievable beauty standard, women will always be exactly what they are in that moment. Women may be smart, easy-going, outright bitches, tall, short, thin, fat, cuddly, sweet, nasty, entertaining, charming, snide, flirty… in other words, fascinating and intriguing in all their human complexity.

At which point, for men, it’s probably more like, “To hell with that standard for now… I’m curious about THIS female!” This is because a whole lot of other attraction factors come into play that can belie our culturally constructed notions of what is considered beautiful.

When women aren’t viewed as possessions with an intrinsic value based on the shape they are and the skin they wear, then a culturally imposed, impossible-to-meet, standard of beauty is no longer necessary. Beauty would go deeper than skin, to layers of human attraction and interest that are as unique as the individuals engaged in the relationship.

♦◊♦

I hope for a time when women can stop competing to meet elusive beauty standards and men will stop competing to possess women that aspire to meeting these standards.

Accepting people as they are in the moment, is the key.

No measures or standards are required (although good personal hygiene helps), just simple acceptance. A woman is every bit a human being as a man. Repeat that daily and attempt to understand what it means in practice.

A man can be certainly attracted. So can a woman. Learn to recognise when she’s not attracted to you and move on with grace and good humour (not at her expense though). If she is attracted, then be geniuine, kind and always, always ASK first—about everything!

Accept that there are facets to people which aren’t tied to culturally imposed standards. Do not seek to own or possess the “most” beautiful of skin and shape: seek instead, a far greater kind of potential beauty, the person within! Learn to see past the overall façade and base attraction for a woman on her character, temperament, her personhood, and her good features (many women do have a physical feature that she does actually like. You can ask her what it is when you’ve built up trust enough to do so).

Show empathy. Demonstrate restraint and good manners. Collect your trophies on the sporting field not from among females! Treat women as they wish to be treated; and if they don’t know how they wish to be treated, go with respect, empathy, equality, humility and compassion.

Like women as friends first and foremost and let go of assuming you must “conquer” them sexually. Relationship must always be mutual and reciprocal.

Allow women to pursue pleasure for its own sake – even sexually if they wish, but without shaming them or imposing that awful Madonna/whore standard on them.

Let women be what they want to be. Inspire their intellect, their creativity, and their joie de vivre. Let women express passions but don’t play coy or manipulate them.

Don’t tell those god awful whiny hapless man-jokes about women! Show restraint with the silly blonde jokes (Note: Regardless of whether a woman is a brunette or a blonde, she is still a human being and one “type” is not more sexually valuable than the other. Get over that whole Blonde thing! It’s crass and you’re better than that! She’s way better than that!).

Help women to love their own bodies and to accept themselves as inherently beautiful because they’re human. Many women can have great difficulty believing a man who tells them they’re beautiful. [I know because I’m one of them!] But they must hear it…often, to help them learn that it is a truth of their personhood and character, not a buy in to beauty culture. Encourage the women you like and love to be healthy and strong, physically, emotionally and mentally.

Learn that your masculinity is not something that requires you to act in certain culturally imposed ways. You do not need to fear being emasculated by women, or your sensitivities, your fears, your romantic side, or your love of heavy thighs and larger than average bottoms! You have every right to express your sexuality your way with the caveat that you must not harm another person through it.

Accept that women will always, always distrust a man before she trusts him. This lack of trust can last long into a relationship. We are so alert to being played, abused, violated, used, and possessed that it can take a long, long, long time for some women to “let go” and trust that you are being genuine and that you really do care (and that you are capable of managing your own life and home for that matter!). We have a lot to learn too, about letting go of our own culturally imposed standards for men. So work with us and beside us on this journey.

It’s about respecting people: not because of their gender, their appearance or their status, but because we’re all in this together and we need each other more than we care to admit.

Mik

Australia

Here’s the post that prompted the original conversation: Beauty, Obsession, Men, and Women

Here is our entire section: Women’s Obsession with Beauty

Photo: schinagl / flickr

 

About the Editors

We're all in this together.

Comments

  1. asdf says:

    I think that sexual atractiveness in women is an attribute that is determined on mainly visual cues. Across times, different environments required a different set of characteristics to give the best survival and replication value. Nowadays all our basic needs are covered, so for instance there is no longer need for excessive fat storage in order to survive the winter. The true genetic strength of women gets to be the measure of beauty. I’m guessing a feminist wrote this…

    • Mike says:

      This argument is wrong on so many levels.

      You are essentially saying that;
      If you have two genes, one for liking thin women, one for linking fat women. These genes changed in frequency, with the fat being most frequent in the 15th century, and the thin being most frequent now.

      This is called a selective sweep. and requires a massive death rate in the population. So we see mini selective sweeps in pandemic flu, such as 1918 spanish flu, malaria, or the current HIV pandemic. Where we can measure the change in the frequency of resistance genes.

      For your argument to be true, being attracted to fat women would have to be lethal, and a sizeable percentage of the population would have had to have died because of it…

      The genes which determine sexual preference have probably changed very slowly over the last 100,000 years, Just about quickly enough to keep up with changes in body plan.

      The people who are most suspicious of evolutionary explanations for behaviour, are the evolutionary biologists.

  2. Chris says:

    Women are physically attracted by alpha male characteristics, men by certain visual cues. This is not gonna change.

  3. DavidByron says:

    This sort of ridiculous over the top feminist gobbledygook probably has the opposite effect from teaching people about the issue because who can take it seriously? The shame is there’s something of interest that could be said about it underneath all that preaching and ideological man bashing. The ridiculous constant Sex War propaganda.

    Women have struggled for centuries against being treated as things or objects

    Men are all bad guy women are all good guys. Men hurt men always. Women are always fighting their oppression. It’s nothing but hate language. Just the idea that all women or all men would have the same view on pretty much ANY topic is absurd on its face but this sort of statement is the sine qua non of feminism.

    But no… all women agree, all men oppose them and they have been at war you see FOR CENTURIES. Gee only centuries? This guy isn’t even trying hard. Why not just say forever? Or at least the last ten thousand years say.

    • Web says:

      Centuries? Really? Well, maybe a little over 1 century, as in late 1800′s-1900′s-early 2000′s.

      Maybe they have been treated as objects throughout history, but “they” are as much responsible for the role as men. And by “they”, I mean women of the past.

      Not only that, but men have had their own share of objectifications. While women are “objectified” by being safely stored away during times of war, who has been fighting those wars? Mostly men.

      Have men created most of the wars? No. Those who have created most of the wars just happen to be men. Most rulers have been men, but nearly all men have not been kings. There’s a difference between a patriarchy and a conspiracy.

      There’s something to be said about the whole “fish unto water, bird unto air” philosophy. The fact is, throughout history, most people didn’t have a problem with either gender role, because they thought “that’s just how it was”. It wasn’t very noticeable until the 20th century when media became more blatantly misogynistic, and thus women were the first to speak out against their gender roles, whilst men kept playing the same game, because we admire adaptability above all.

      It’s been one of the issues all along: One of the men’s problems is internalizing external problems. Because of this, women have been the only ones speaking out, so many people seem to think women are the only ones with problems.

  4. HidingFromtheDinosaurs says:

    I think that the message of this article, barring a few broad strokes in the early parts which others have pointed out, is essentially good. However, I object to the list contained being aimed exclusively at men. I believe that just as many women could stand to learn these lessons on proper and respectful treatment of fellow human beings and the importance of seeing them as fellow human beings first, rather than as adversaries, objects or aliens.

    I can especially respect the last point regarding fear and distrust, and it is also the one I think most needs to be communicated to people of all genders. As a former victim of institutionalized abuse by groups of women, I have a very hard time coming to trust anyone and have developed a real fear of getting close to people. I feel that women often severely underestimate the harm they can do both physically and emotionally and fail to take the feelings and comfort-zones of others into account as a result. I suspect that both misogyny (underestimating the strength of a woman and devaluing the results of a woman’s actions) and misandry (devaluing the feelings and well being of men) conspire to reinforce this trend.

  5. Dannielle says:

    This is something i’ve written about several times. There definitely needs to be a big shift in perception of women, by themselves AND others.
    http://strangekitty.ca/body-image-and-the-younger-generation/

  6. click says:

    The look for your website is a bit off in Epiphany. Nevertheless I like your weblog. I might need to install a normal browser just to enjoy it.

  7. Andy Bodle says:

    I’m afraid the author has rather got it all arse about face. We don’t acquire beautiful women to boost our status. We boost our status to acquire beautiful women! Basic evolutionary principle.

    As for the paradox, there is none. Men who choose fertile, symmetrical women will have more offspring, and thus pass on that preference. So we’ve all evolved a preference for youth and beauty; we all want the most beautiful young female.

    Trouble is, we can’t all *have* the most beautiful young female. But mating with a less attractive female is better than not mating at all, so our high sex drive makes us work our way down the ladder until we find someone willing to have us.

    (NB we don’t necessarily do this consciously! And the same goes for women, only their selection criteria are slightly different.)

Trackbacks

Speak Your Mind

*