The truth is there are deep gender divides in our views of male and female. .
___
As we move more deeply into the election season, it becomes evident that we are a deeply divided country. Government is gridlocked and the private sector does what it does best—makes more and more money for those who already have a lot of money. But there is one thing everyone seems to agree on. This is an election like no other in modern history.
CNN says, “This presidential cycle has been full of twists and turns, but there’s been one constant: Conventional wisdom has been dead wrong.”
We see this most clearly in the continuing popularity of Donald Trump in spite of his outrageous rhetoric including the following:
“An ‘extremely credible source’ has called my office and told me that Barack Obama’s birth certificate is a fraud.”
“Ariana Huffington is unattractive, both inside and out. I fully understand why her former husband left her for a man – he made a good decision.”
“You know, it really doesn’t matter what the media write as long as you’ve got a young, and beautiful, piece of ass.”
“I would bomb the sh– out of them. I would just bomb those suckers, and that’s right, I’d blow up the pipes, I’d blow up the refineries, I’d blow up every single inch, there would be nothing left.”
Don’t like ads? Become a supporter and enjoy The Good Men Project ad free“I’ve said if Ivanka weren’t my daughter, perhaps I’d be dating her.”
“My fingers are long and beautiful, as, it has been well documented, are various other parts of my body.”
These kinds of statements repulse many. As a trauma-informed therapist they are red flags of a person who has suffered serious abuse, neglect, and abandonment. Could you imagine a female presidential candidate getting away with these kinds of statements? It’s difficult to even contemplate.
But Frank Bruni expands our thinking in a New York Times Op Ed column, “If Donald Trump Changed Genders:”
“Imagine for a moment, the presidential candidacy of a rich, brash real estate magnate and reality TV star named Donna Trump,” says Bruni.
“Quizzically coifed and stubbornly sun-kissed, she’s on her third marriage. There’s clear evidence that infidelity factored into the demise of the first, and among her children is one conceived when The Donna wasn’t married to the other parent.
“Her sexual appetites have been prodigious, at least according to her frequent claims and vulgar cant. And she has a tendency — disturbing on its own, even more so in someone who aspires to civic leadership — to talk about men as sirloins and rump roasts of disparate succulence. She denigrates those who displease her on cosmetic grounds:
“So-and-so used to be a 9 but, with that male-pattern baldness and desperate comb-over, is down to a 6. So-and-so thinks he’s covering up that paunch with baggy suits, but we all know better.
“How well do you think The Donna would do in the polls? How far into the race would she survive?”
Bruni goes on to note that
“The 2016 quest for the White House has included ample exegeses on gender and plenty of talk about double standards, but most if not all of those have pertained to Hillary Clinton.”
The truth is there are deep gender divides in our views of male and female. Most of us were raised with an interesting double standard. The things we were told men MUST BE are the same things we were told that women MUST NOT BE and vice versa. Here are a few comparisons that come to mind:
Men MUST BE and women MUST NOT BE:
- Strong
- Aggressive
- Overtly sexual
- Pugnacious
- Athletic
- Hairy
- Outspoken
And it doesn’t hurt if you’re a crude and rude bully…as long as you’re a winner.
Women MUST BE and men MUST NOT Be:
- Soft
- Gentle
- Passive
- Proper
- Curvy
- Smooth
- Quiet
There are two reasons Donald Trump is so popular and may very well become the next President of the United States. First, he’s rich. In a country where the playing field is tilted to help the richest 1% and tilted even further to help the richest 1/10 of 1%, being super rich is equated with success. Second, he’s a celebrity. Like being rich in America, being a celebrity counts for a lot.
I’m not sure who the first female President will be, but I do know that women like mid-life billionaires Christy Walton, Laurene Jobs, and Oprah Winfrey, along with celebrities like Beyonce, Scarlett Johansson, and Angelina Jolie, would have an easier time getting elected than Hillary Clinton.
Women like Clinton carry a double gender burden. If they’re strong and aggressive enough to be a viable candidate, they are accused of not being “real women.” If they are caring enough to govern well, they are accused of being “too soft” to be an effective President.
But there’s another reason why Donald Trump is so popular these days and it has to do with the state of the world. No one has diagnosed our present situation better or offered a way out when we’re ready to listen than my colleague Rebecca Costa, author of The Watchman’s Rattle: A Radical New Theory of Collapse. Costa, one of the world’s leading experts in sociobiology with a long history as a business leader, says “Every person I know, rich or poor, educated or not, wants to know why our government gets more in debt, our air and water more polluted, our jails more crowded, our security more tenuous and our children more violent. We appear to have lost our ability to solve our problems.”
Costa asks what caused the collapse of great civilizations such as the Mayan, Romans, and Khymer and looks below the surface. She says, “We now know that the Mayans lived with drought conditions, civil war, and growing food shortages for thousands of years prior to collapse. However, foreseeing all these problems in advance was of little use. The Mayans lacked the ability to discern the complexity of their circumstances and, therefore, had little possibility of rectifying deteriorating conditions.”
She goes on to note that the U.S. is facing a similar crisis. “Today, we face the same cognitive threshold that the Mayans, Romans, Khmer, and other advanced civilizations once encountered.” As the problems we face become more and more complex, we become stressed and depressed. Instead of facing the complexity head on and finding real solutions, we look for simple, fantasy, solutions, that promise to easily solve all our problems.
That’s why Trump is so popular. We all want solutions and many would willingly escape into a “Reality-TV Presidency” than address the real issues we face. Millions are drawn to the world according to Trump:
- I’ll build a wall to keep us safe and make the Mexicans pay for it.
- I’ll get rid of all the people who are a threat to our way of life. Ship them out and if they won’t leave, well….
- I won’t put up with any shit from anyone. I’m the biggest, baddest, dude on the playground. Vote for me and you may not be rich and famous, but you can pretend.
- Forget about the complexities of gender. Men are men and women are women and if you have a problem with that…read my lips. “You know, it really doesn’t matter what the media write as long as you’ve got a young, and beautiful, piece of ass.”
Beating up on Trump is easy, but it only makes him stronger as the other Republican hopefuls have learned. The real question for all of is this. Do we have the courage to deal with the real-world complexities we face and find real-world solutions or would we rather live in fantasy land while the real world collapses around us? I look forward to your comments.
Originally posted on MenAlive. Reprinted with permission.
____
Photo credit: Getty Images
Rebecca Costa, author of The Watchman’s Rattle: A Radical New Theory of Collapse. Costa, one of the world’s leading experts in sociobiology with a long history as a business leader, says “Every person I know, rich or poor, educated or not, wants to know why our government gets more in debt, our air and water more polluted, our jails more crowded, our security more tenuous and our children more violent. We appear to have lost our ability to solve our problems.” Ats an easy one. David Blankenhorn told us over 30 years ago: Fatherless America. Dinesh D’SouzaIt warned us to… Read more »
“I don’t know. How many men could sexually assault a woman on broadcast TV and still keep their honors? ” —- C’mon now, John. Look at the way he was dressed. He was asking for it! Stop whining. Suck it up, ya misogynist. But to be serious here for a second. This is what is confusing the hell out of men today: not “toxic-Masculinity”, but being shamed into an unnaturally submissive state so as to avoid the pop-cultural apparition of “toxic masculinity” while at the same time witnessing the opposite done to them as an example of “empowered femininity”. See,… Read more »
If he were a woman, he would probably experience a mix of support and derision, just like Trump is now. He’s more extreme than Sarah Palin but only just and she didn’t do too badly? Sure, she had plenty of detractors but for the most part the media did exactly what people would never do to Trump – defend him on the basis of gender, no matter how awful the words or actions. “Don’t pick on her, can’t you see she’s a woman?” It’s seems highly unlikely that Trump would win the Presidential Election, even if he wins the Republican… Read more »
They base Trump’s resiliency on the fact that his base doesn’t repudiate him, but neither did Bill Clinton’s when the rape accusations started coming out. I remember Bob Packwood had some serious and plentiful allegations against him as well, but he was a reliable liberal / progressive vote so the left turned a blind eye to them for years maybe decades.
Judging by the “success” Sarah Palin had running as VP….I think Trump would do just fine if he were female…possible even better.
The Roman Empire really deserves more credit than we tend to give them. If anything, a nearly 1500-year run indicates that a civilization was actually quite adept at resolving complex issues.
Good point. It took 200 years of catastrophic outbreaks of plague to finally knock them down. Before the initial outbreak Justinian had defeated the Vandals and Ostrogoths and had retaken pretty much all of the Mediterranean world. That’s not exactly a failure of perspective.
Although the comparison of Donald Trump’s candidacy to the fall of the Roman Empire is pretty funny. At least no one yelped “Drumpf!” Or “Hitler!” this time.
I don’t know. How many men could sexually assault a woman on broadcast TV and still keep their honors?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3484084/Stephen-Colbert-left-speechless-Helen-Mirren-greets-sexy-kiss-lips.html
Oh and with the excuse that she wanted to do it and so took her chance. I suppose saying sorry would have been enough if she didn’t know that it was wrong and decided to do it anyway. If I’m not mistaken, a Dame is a royal title much like a Knight’s Sir. So you think she’s going to lose it or are the British OK with female on male sexual assault?
Double standard
No, we’re not ok with it at all. We just have the same double standards prevalent in your country. It happened to me many years ago, a woman said my penis looked big through my chinos and decided to test my package. It wasn’t invited and it wasn’t wanted. Also, it wasn’t the first time such a thing happened to me.
Yet the article is about how MEN can get away with things that women CAN’T. I see women being able to get away with a whole lot more than men or did we forget the criticize Sanders got for telling Clinton it was his turn to talk?