Forget the blow up between Bernie Sanders and the DNC, his answers during the debate show why he won’t be the nominee.
Saturday’s presidential debate between the Democratic candidates was a bit of an interesting exercise. On one hand a televised debate on a Saturday night a week before Christmas during the biggest movie-opening weekend ever was never going to attract many viewers. But then just days before the debate started their was a huge blow up between Bernie Sander’s campaign and the Democratic National Committee after Sanders’ data manager exploited a glitch in the DNC’s voter file to try and look at Hillary Clinton’s list of supporters in a number of states.
The details are complicated, but suffice to say the Sanders staffer was fired and Bernie Sanders apologized to Hillary Clinton and his own supporters for the screw up during the debate. The debate then continued on as a pretty normal policy focused affair where the biggest headlines were probably made afterwards when Donald Trump called Hillary Clinton’s bathroom break at half time “disgusting.”
Trump’s juvenile and sexist comments aside, the debate still revealed an important point about why Bernie Sanders just isn’t going to be the Democratic nominee. Sanders is running as what political scientists like to call a “factional candidate” focused on mobilizing the Democratic Party’s most liberal wing (or faction) around issues like economics, health care, and electoral reform. Hence why Bernie has little to say about foreign policy or other issues that are very important to other groups inside the Democratic coalition that aren’t exactly “feeling the Bern” right now. Jonathan Bernstein put it this way:
Sanders did what he’s in the contest to do: Make the case for the most liberal wing of the Democratic party. For him, it really does come down to the rich vs. the rest. His most telling moment was turning a question about domestic terrorism and ethnic profiling back to income inequality, saying, “I believe we stand together to address the real issues facing this country, not allow them to divide us by race or where we come from.”
Sanders is knowledgeable in many areas, but the reason he’s not in sync with his party isn’t so much specific differences on policies as it is that he seems to be saying that other concerns—ISIS, race, immigration and so on—aren’t “real issues.”
Meanwhile Hillary seems very intent on building a broad based coalition, hence why she is dominating the endorsement side of the race.
To be sure, Sanders has largely succeeded in his goal of moving the Democratic Party to take a more liberal line when it comes the economic issues he cares about, so in that sense his campaign has been a success. The problem for him is that by doing that he’s alienated enough of the rest of the party that winning the actual nomination becomes close to impossible.
Source: 30dB.com – Bernie Sanders vs Hillary Clinton
Like The Good Men Project On Facebook
Photo by John Locher/AP
Honestly speaking, the endorsement wing of the Democratic Party’s been getting its ass consistently kicked in every election for the past 8 years except for getting Obama reelected, and even that has more to do with Obama than with their support.
I’m more than willing to bet on the guy who’s actually trying to be a Democrat, rather than being Republican Lite.
Really bad choice of “featured content”. I expect more from this site. A total opinion piece, with little real content. Bah.
“Reviled.” Does anyone proofread anymore? Bernie may not win the White House, but he has my vote in the primary.
It is in the GOP’s best interest for Hillary to win. She cannot, given her funding, both the amount and the specific contributors, win against either Donald Trump, Dr. Carson, Ted Cruz, or Rand Paul. She could be named in that group and be identified with them by many Democratic and Independent voters of this country . Hillary does not and will likely not win the Democratic nomination. You Sir are incorrect.
John, I really appreciate your opinion here but maybe you should stick to articles such as “10 ways to love your woman” pieces. I respect and support GMP but I want those few minutes of my life after reading this back.
Bernie Sanders may be out of sync with the Democratic party establishment, i.e. the “endorsement side of the race,” but the party establishment is out of sync with Democratic voters. The coalition that overwhelmingly elected Obama twice isn’t going to show up at the polls for Hillary.
Useless waste of time to read. Nothing newsworthy or substantial enough to put to print. An opinion piece. Featured content? Expect more from good men project. One step closers to disconnecting w gmp.
John, thank you for writing this. It benefits the party when information is presented about their candidates. One doesn’t have to slam the other to make a point. Educated decision makes for a good decision.