Male Passion Repressed or Uncontrollable, And Never Anything More

battle portraits

Male passion is maligned in two ways: through rebuke and identification as uncontrollable.


Don’t cry, because tears are not for men. Don’t despair, because weakness and inaction are not for you. And if you should feel sadness, don’t explain or dignify it, because stoicism shall be the stamp of your virtuous manhood. The same goes for immoderate excitement, as a stoic man, a true man, is guided by his logic and not beholden to his emotion. You should be calm and collected, motivated by your inner drive, not some flame of womanly passion or emotion.

Implied, codified in common phrase, formally endorsed, or carried through by rebuke, these are the suggestions and rules of masculinity when it comes to emotion. The message is pretty clear when it all comes together: men are not to indulge or air their emotions, whether they include fear, sadness, excitement, love, or joy.

There are millions of us who live according to this message, taking care to conceal the emotions that we’ve been told are unacceptable. And such personal pressure can easily lead to anxiety, shame, and self-hatred for many of us, as we find ourselves incapable of completely suppressing these feelings. If unable to do so, some of us worry that we are not full men, barely in control of these non-masculine traits. Or, we become ashamed of such weakness, worried that we will be found out, or angry at and hateful of ourselves for failing in such an important part of manliness. To some reading this, this description probably sounds extreme, but I followed this exact path for much of my teenaged years, feeling shame at my weakness and expressing it through anger at others and myself. And don’t only take my word for it. Shame, anger, worry, and self-hatred are the inimical feelings which propel drug abuse, alcoholism, and suicide, diseases and violences by which men are overwhelmingly afflicted relative to women.


And, in addition to this platonic, patriarchal ideal of male stoicism is another concept of male passion that is interestingly related: male passion is uncontrollable. This idea, that our passionate drives, including anger and our desire for sex, lie outside of our own conscious power to manage them, is less obvious than the directives about emotion above, at least until you start looking for it. But, it is there, indeed it is a culturally dominant tenet of masculinity.

For example, consider the notion of a “crime of passion,” the legal defense that a man’s murder of his cheating wife or her lover is justifiable, or at least mitigated in its seriousness, because of his own anger. Or, consider the similar gay panic defense, a less commonly-known, yet equally ridiculous, argument that a murderer was driven to kill by unwanted homosexual solicitation or homophobia. Likewise, think about the pernicious idea, much more powerful, that victims of domestic violence have provoked their abuser, that their abuser is not in control of his violent anger, that the victim is the impetus.  All in all, these are institutionalized and socialized suggestions that we are not in control of our rage.

Similarly, there are parallel narratives surrounding male sexuality. Dress codes for young women in school are often justified by a reminder that boys cannot concentrate otherwise. Countless ignorant and downright dishonorable men and women  endorse this view of male sexuality in regards to rape and sexual assault, crediting victims for the perpetration of their assault by focusing on their behavior beforehand, or their dress during.

These practices are rightly identified as victim-blaming. The murder victim is to blame because of her infidelity or his homosexuality. The survivor of domestic abuse is to blame because of her provocation. The survivor of rape or sexual assault has brought the crime upon herself by sending ‘mixed signals,’ or dressing suggestively.

But more than that, these tendencies impose a hurtful notion upon us men: that we are weak, not in control. We do not choose violence, distraction, rape, or abuse, but are rather driven to it by urges and impulses that may be ours, but which we are not capable of directing. And thus begins the tendency to victim blame: because men are moved by uncontrollable impulses, society must delegate the power to manage men to women. It is women who should not provoke men. It is women who should not flirt, flaunt, or be sexy unless they want sex. It is women who are pure, perfect, and counterintuitively powerful, able to provoke, goad, or transform their man.

Such a notion of passion, of sexual drive and rage, is a powerful one, I think. It works to justify rape and domestic violence, both by encouraging perpetrators to believe in, and realize, their own lack of control, and by mitigating their worthiness of blame when accused or addressed. And there is another effect as well, when this notion makes so many of us live in fear of what we might be driven to do. I know that I’ve felt such fear. When we are told, time and time again, that these traits are monolithic, powerful, and uncontrollable, we tend to internalize that idea over the long term. And when we see those drives realized on others, whether they be survivors of sexual assault or abuse, we are horrified at the results of such beastly power. Unless we challenge the notion that we are uncontrollable in our rage and sex drive, the only reasonable response to such an idea is fear and constant self-suspicion.


These two parallel narratives, that emotion should be repressed and that passion, whether it be in anger or sex, cannot be controlled, constitute a central conception of masculinity.

And, not only is that conception wrong. We should feel free to express, air, and share our emotions as we see fit, and we are in control our anger and our sex drives.

Not only is this conception influential, as it drives us to a collective lack of emotional health and far-too-high rates of abuse and assault.

But more than these things, this conception is both disrespectful and unjust. Our passions, feelings, and desires are natural things, standing at the center of who we are as human beings. When it is argued and thought that we should conceal, or that we are not in control of these things, the argument is also made that these parts of us are wrong. The argument is made that there is some wrongness in our maleness.

As a man who knows his self-control and the great meaning of his passions and emotions, I reject that idea. As men who collectively know our agency and worth, we should all reject this idea. The alternative is an unfeeling existence characterized by seemingly inevitable violence, and that is unacceptable.

Image Via: familymwr/Flickr

About Kevin Carty

Kevin Carty is a 20-year-old feminist frat boy and Political Theory major at Brown University. He loves coffee, punk rock, communitarianism, and the reformation of modern masculinity. He tweets from @PolitiCarty, and can be reached at


  1. Right on Kevin. It often bewilders me that quite a few women I know agree that their male partners are ’emotionally unavailable’ yet have sons who already display the same characteristics. They fail to put 2 and 2 together to see that they are unwittingly creating their own generation of emotionally illiterate boys who will find their ‘mother’ in the future partner and perpetuate the very behaviour they find so disturbing. An Australian indigenous author, Minmia, in her book, “Under The Quangdong Tree” asks that when a man commits an atrocity either in society or in war, ‘where is his mother?’. I think this is a good question as we know that father-absence (ala Iron John) leaves a teenage boy with no role model, however in those first 3 highly formative years, it’s a boys’ mother that teaches him about emotions, empathy, relatedness, expression, feelings and his connection with his Heart.

    It took me many years of therapy to firstly understand that I was actually feeling something in my body, then to be able to articulate that feeling, then to learn the language of the nuance of feeling. Such was my own state of disconnection from my feeling function.

    Mothers and fathers can do so much more to enable our boys to be whole, however we cannot give what don’t ourselves have, whether it be respect, boundaries, self-worth or Love!

  2. wellokaythen says:

    Don’t let other men shame you into keeping your emotions repressed. By the same token, don’t let women shame you into emotional repression either. This is not just some sort of “guy code” where men police themselves about showing their full range of feelings. Many women have told men to “suck it up and stop being such a baby.”

  3. Thank you for saying this! As the mother of two boys, now both in their teens, I’ve always said that boys (and men) have the right (and NEED) to the full range of human emotion and the responsibility to understand and manage their emotional lives. I actively teach my sons emotional intelligence and communication skills and hope that more boys and men can feel free to enjoy ALL the aspects of their human selves.

  4. Mike from MA says:

    Lot of grist here, Kevin!

    Definitely makes me want to start a men’s book club to read and discuss The Iliad. It is nothing if not a study in full-spectrum masculinity, with a thorough consideration of the consequences and reverberations that has for men.


    • Why not Iron John as well, Mike? There is so much story and mythic content in our collective consciousness to draw upon, and none of us are deprived of the true masculine because those archetypes are there, as Jung said.


  1. […] I wrote a few weeks ago, our society talks about domestic and sexual violence in such a way that it is always focused on […]

Speak Your Mind