The Ballad of Betty and Veronica, Part I: Falling for a Stripper

Premium Membership, The Good Men Project

About Jackie Summers

Jackie Summers is an author and entrepreneur. His blog F*cking in Brooklyn chronicles his quest to become a person worthy of love. His company, Jack From Brooklyn, Inc. houses his creative and entrepreneurial enterprises. Follow him on Twitter @jackfrombkln and friend him on Facebook


  1. Sooo….this is a story about hanging around with whores, sorry, “smart” whores, and some schmuck falling for one of them? Yuck. Hahahahaha.

    • Michael Nebab says:

      Interesting how you readily refer to a woman you know almost nothing about a “whore”—simply because she’s a stripper I presume? Well may I ask you what you think the existence of strip clubs period says about the underlying, causal society? And while I’m at it, may I also ask you what you think the prevalence of supposed female whores should say about the MEN who enable them and their behavior? I mean, wouldn’t that make those men just as whorish as well? Aside from trolling the internet, wasting your time, and posting useless, snarky, ignorant, and most of all faceless (thereby gutless) comments on the internet, what exactly are you doing to actually improve society and especially intersexual relations? …Or are you just a typical dipshit who does nothing apart from troll and jack off to tube8…

  2. Nope. Just stating a fact. Look up “whore” in the dictionary sometime and you’ll understand. Or don’t because you think I’m a “troll” who shall remain faceless. I’ve publically argued this and i’m not hiding behind the protective wall of internet anonymity. I just think it’s hilarious when people don’t take the time to see whether an argument is valid or flawed and just jump straight to “troll.”

    • Michael Nebab says:

      Weak response, given that you didn’t even respond to my questions and the implied points therein. Maybe if you DID address any of those challenges, you’d have realized that I indeed “[took] the time to see whether [your] argument [was] valid or flawed”. I was asking for stubstance; yet you failed to substantiate any of your bullshit initial comment, and followed up my challenge with more unsubstantial bullshit. Mark of a troll.

      And allow me to state some facts to you, asshole:
      - all effects have causes, number one
      - number two, so long as effects have causes (hence, so long as “whores” have makers), whatever judgment you pass unto the former extend naturally to the latter
      - finally, ridiculing people for their ignorance as if they were born ignorant and not made ignorant and thus somehow 100% accountable for who they are is the mark of a true ignoramus.

      If you want to be a chauvinistic, ignorant dickhead, there are plenty of places on the internet for you to do that. At GMP, however, we pride ourselves on seeing the bigger picture—that is, beyond broad and shallow generalizations of men and women as “whores”.

      • I don’t mean to feed the troll here, but there is no need for substance when the claim is straightforward: according to, whore: a woman (or man) who engages in sexual acts for money. Are you trying to tell me that a stripper is in fact NOT engaging in sexual acts for money? Come on, you sound like a smart dude. Be smart enough to walk away from an argument that you can’t win.

Speak Your Mind