Military Judge Rules Pfc. Bradley Manning’s Confinement Was Excessive

Bradley Manning faces charges for leaking classified military information. Charges that include aiding the enemy which carries a maximum of life behind bars.

Pfc. Bradley Manning, the Army private accused of sending hundreds of classified military documents to the website WikiLeaks has had his potential sentence reduced by military judge Colonel Denise Lind during a pretrial hearing at Fort Meade. CBS News reports that Col. Lind ruled that Manning had “suffered illegal pretrial punishment” over the last 9 months while being held in a Marine Corps brig in Quantico, Virginia. Manning was awarded a total 112 days off any prison sentence he may receive if convicted.

The judge said in her ruling that the confinement was “more rigorous than necessary,” and that the conditions of his confinement “became excessive in relation to legitimate government interests.” Manning had been confined, sometimes without clothing, to a 6-by-8-foot windowless cell for 23 hours a day. Authorities at the brig testified that Manning was classified as a “suicide risk,” and that they were “only trying to keep him from hurting himself and others.”

Manning, who faces 22 charges, is back at Fort Meade for a 4 day pretrial hearing which will include arguments concerning whether testimony as to his motivation behind the leaking of classified documents should be allowed at trial. The prosecution asserts that his motives are not relevant and that he leaked intelligence knowing that it would be seen by US enemies, specifically al Qaeda. However, his defense attorney, David Coombs argues that,

Barring such evidence would cripple the defense’s ability to argue that Manning leaked only information that he believed couldn’t hurt the United States or help a foreign nation … Manning has offered to take responsibility for the leaks in a pending plea offer but he still could face trial on charges that include aiding the enemy.

It has been alleged that Pfc. Manning told a confidant who has since become an informant, that he leaked the classified materials because he wants the US people to “see the truth,” and that “information should be free.”

Do you think motive should be included in criminal cases such as these?

Do you think that Pfc. Bradley Manning is a “good” man for leaking the documents?

Photo: savebradley/Flickr

About Kathryn DeHoyos

Kathryn DeHoyos currently resides on the outskirts of Austin, TX. She has 2 beautiful children, and is very happily un-married to her life partner DJ.


  1. Sergeant First Class, U.S. Army says:

    I will try to approach this topic carefully, Manning upon enlisting in the Army swore to obey the orders of the officers appointed over him, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. If he does not follow the orders he is willfully violating Article 90 of the UCMJ. He violated orders by accessing then transmitting unauthorized information through non-secure means to unauthorized people. This is a valid charge. If he felt the video or files contained a criminal activity taking place then the Army has avenues to report it. And the system DOES work. He has no right or authority to release information pertaining to military maneuvers or missions to ANY outside agents. He committed a crime and will be tried in military court and it is not up to civilians to question or second-guess the legal process he swore to abide by. His actions could have cost service members their lives and I could have been one of his victims. The level of classification has little to do with the case. He doesn’t get to pick and choose what is going to be released. He was an entry level Private.

  2. The case regarding former CIA officer John C Kiriakou seems especially excessive as well. I hope people come to his aid too.

Speak Your Mind