Patience: The Art of Peaceful Living

burned out airliner

How can practicing Buddhism save you from a burning wreck?

The Monk was Celibate, and Then Not…

wedding photo

A newlywed psychotherapist meditates on the goodness of her marriage to a monk

Would the Buddha Look at Porn?

5679436996_07667da748_b

On the question of porn, Buddhist American Keith Andresen is torn between culture and faith.

The Last Sunset of Pieter Pilon

Pieter-Pilons-final-sunset

Atalwin and his brother perform a ceremony on a beach far from home, and wish their father a safe and swift passage to the other shore.

Becoming Who You Want to Be (When You Grow Up)

shutterstock_102262657

Who do you want to be when you grow up?

Let’s Go to Thailand

Hong Kong sunset

Atalwin flies to Thailand to study with a warrior: a former Thai boxer who became a Buddhist monk.

5: Pink Girls Painted Pink

5: Pink Girls Painted Pink

There were two living models, though I grace this quatrain, Pink Girls Painted Pink, with only one, because of self-imposed deadline constraints. Each was painted by Artist Alexa Meade, who is as gifted as Mary Cassatt and who applies her colors with a softer and happier touch than did Ms. Cassatt. If I got it right, the name of the model I depict is Alexa Split. (Contemporary and Cool, Cool Name.)
Artist Alexa Meade apparently got it in her brain that she would paint living models as if she were painting portraits like Henri Matisse or Amedeo Modigliani, thus creating portraiture in a way I have never seen before. (Spiffy and Funky and Perhaps Immortal.)
The lighting was both artificial and natural, and the audience was invited to take photographs, thusly “reinterpreting the work,” as the National Portrait Gallery brochure on the event states. (National Portrait Gallery Washington D.C. USA, that would be.)
I worked hard—diligently, effectively, magnanimously, bobbing in, bobbing out, elbowing my way for optimum angles way up front— with my trusty Samsung $326.47 TL34HD point-and-shoot digital, and found Model Alexa Split’s body more intriguing than her beautiful face. I judged that Model Alexa Split and Artist Alexa Meade were 38 years younger than me, so I didn’t ask them out for Skip and Go Nakeds, nor did I hit on them with lines about how 27 artists in Paris in the late 1800s lived in one apartment (it must have been a large thing) with one—I swear, one—toilet bowl. I am sure such esoteric fact flinging by a mature aesthete such as me would have impressed them both, but I didn’t do what I venture a lot of boy models photographing $1 million Vogue models do. I kept the whole event free from dirty thoughts, carnal mortal sin and scurrilous resultant gossip.
I have no conclusions to reach about this event other than to say that Artist Alexa Meade’s inventive idea of the whole thing is ingenious, and I wish that I (my humble, broke self) had come up with it. I also believe, fervently in my sensitive heart, that Vogue Magazine should hire me to depict its models, and Vogue should then splash my photographs all over all the grocery stores of the world, and pay me lots of money too, don’t you? All my work with gorgeous skinny, if not decimated, models who must spend half their days hungry for lunch would then be guaranteed lust-free and G-Rated, in the best of American traditions.

4: Pink Girls Painted Pink

4: Pink Girls Painted Pink

There were two living models, though I grace this quatrain, Pink Girls Painted Pink, with only one, because of self-imposed deadline constraints. Each was painted by Artist Alexa Meade, who is as gifted as Mary Cassatt and who applies her colors with a softer and happier touch than did Ms. Cassatt. If I got it right, the name of the model I depict is Alexa Split. (Contemporary and Cool, Cool Name.)
Artist Alexa Meade apparently got it in her brain that she would paint living models as if she were painting portraits like Henri Matisse or Amedeo Modigliani, thus creating portraiture in a way I have never seen before. (Spiffy and Funky and Perhaps Immortal.)
The lighting was both artificial and natural, and the audience was invited to take photographs, thusly “reinterpreting the work,” as the National Portrait Gallery brochure on the event states. (National Portrait Gallery Washington D.C. USA, that would be.)
I worked hard—diligently, effectively, magnanimously, bobbing in, bobbing out, elbowing my way for optimum angles way up front— with my trusty Samsung $326.47 TL34HD point-and-shoot digital, and found Model Alexa Split’s body more intriguing than her beautiful face. I judged that Model Alexa Split and Artist Alexa Meade were 38 years younger than me, so I didn’t ask them out for Skip and Go Nakeds, nor did I hit on them with lines about how 27 artists in Paris in the late 1800s lived in one apartment (it must have been a large thing) with one—I swear, one—toilet bowl. I am sure such esoteric fact flinging by a mature aesthete such as me would have impressed them both, but I didn’t do what I venture a lot of boy models photographing $1 million Vogue models do. I kept the whole event free from dirty thoughts, carnal mortal sin and scurrilous resultant gossip.
I have no conclusions to reach about this event other than to say that Artist Alexa Meade’s inventive idea of the whole thing is ingenious, and I wish that I (my humble, broke self) had come up with it. I also believe, fervently in my sensitive heart, that Vogue Magazine should hire me to depict its models, and Vogue should then splash my photographs all over all the grocery stores of the world, and pay me lots of money too, don’t you? All my work with gorgeous skinny, if not decimated, models who must spend half their days hungry for lunch would then be guaranteed lust-free and G-Rated, in the best of American traditions.

3: Pink Girls Painted Pink

3: Pink Girls Painted Pink

There were two living models, though I grace this quatrain, Pink Girls Painted Pink, with only one, because of self-imposed deadline constraints. Each was painted by Artist Alexa Meade, who is as gifted as Mary Cassatt and who applies her colors with a softer and happier touch than did Ms. Cassatt. If I got it right, the name of the model I depict is Alexa Split. (Contemporary and Cool, Cool Name.)
Artist Alexa Meade apparently got it in her brain that she would paint living models as if she were painting portraits like Henri Matisse or Amedeo Modigliani, thus creating portraiture in a way I have never seen before. (Spiffy and Funky and Perhaps Immortal.)
The lighting was both artificial and natural, and the audience was invited to take photographs, thusly “reinterpreting the work,” as the National Portrait Gallery brochure on the event states. (National Portrait Gallery Washington D.C. USA, that would be.)
I worked hard—diligently, effectively, magnanimously, bobbing in, bobbing out, elbowing my way for optimum angles way up front— with my trusty Samsung $326.47 TL34HD point-and-shoot digital, and found Model Alexa Split’s body more intriguing than her beautiful face. I judged that Model Alexa Split and Artist Alexa Meade were 38 years younger than me, so I didn’t ask them out for Skip and Go Nakeds, nor did I hit on them with lines about how 27 artists in Paris in the late 1800s lived in one apartment (it must have been a large thing) with one—I swear, one—toilet bowl. I am sure such esoteric fact flinging by a mature aesthete such as me would have impressed them both, but I didn’t do what I venture a lot of boy models photographing $1 million Vogue models do. I kept the whole event free from dirty thoughts, carnal mortal sin and scurrilous resultant gossip.
I have no conclusions to reach about this event other than to say that Artist Alexa Meade’s inventive idea of the whole thing is ingenious, and I wish that I (my humble, broke self) had come up with it. I also believe, fervently in my sensitive heart, that Vogue Magazine should hire me to depict its models, and Vogue should then splash my photographs all over all the grocery stores of the world, and pay me lots of money too, don’t you? All my work with gorgeous skinny, if not decimated, models who must spend half their days hungry for lunch would then be guaranteed lust-free and G-Rated, in the best of American traditions.

2: Pink Girls Painted Pink

2: Pink Girls Painted Pink

There were two living models, though I grace this quatrain, Pink Girls Painted Pink, with only one, because of self-imposed deadline constraints. Each was painted by Artist Alexa Meade, who is as gifted as Mary Cassatt and who applies her colors with a softer and happier touch than did Ms. Cassatt. If I got it right, the name of the model I depict is Alexa Split. (Contemporary and Cool, Cool Name.)
Artist Alexa Meade apparently got it in her brain that she would paint living models as if she were painting portraits like Henri Matisse or Amedeo Modigliani, thus creating portraiture in a way I have never seen before. (Spiffy and Funky and Perhaps Immortal.)
The lighting was both artificial and natural, and the audience was invited to take photographs, thusly “reinterpreting the work,” as the National Portrait Gallery brochure on the event states. (National Portrait Gallery Washington D.C. USA, that would be.)
I worked hard—diligently, effectively, magnanimously, bobbing in, bobbing out, elbowing my way for optimum angles way up front— with my trusty Samsung $326.47 TL34HD point-and-shoot digital, and found Model Alexa Split’s body more intriguing than her beautiful face. I judged that Model Alexa Split and Artist Alexa Meade were 38 years younger than me, so I didn’t ask them out for Skip and Go Nakeds, nor did I hit on them with lines about how 27 artists in Paris in the late 1800s lived in one apartment (it must have been a large thing) with one—I swear, one—toilet bowl. I am sure such esoteric fact flinging by a mature aesthete such as me would have impressed them both, but I didn’t do what I venture a lot of boy models photographing $1 million Vogue models do. I kept the whole event free from dirty thoughts, carnal mortal sin and scurrilous resultant gossip.
I have no conclusions to reach about this event other than to say that Artist Alexa Meade’s inventive idea of the whole thing is ingenious, and I wish that I (my humble, broke self) had come up with it. I also believe, fervently in my sensitive heart, that Vogue Magazine should hire me to depict its models, and Vogue should then splash my photographs all over all the grocery stores of the world, and pay me lots of money too, don’t you? All my work with gorgeous skinny, if not decimated, models who must spend half their days hungry for lunch would then be guaranteed lust-free and G-Rated, in the best of American traditions.

A Most Unfortunate Man

A Most Unfortunate Man

This is a depiction of a man I photographed just outside Union Station in Washington, D.C., USA, on Sunday June 3 2012, at about 3 in the afternoon. The man did not notice me when I was taking the shot, which was all right with me. I steal pictures of people when making street photography, hoping always to not be noticed, because I have been the recipient of much disdain, anger, derision and ridicule when I have pointed my camera at people in public.
An example: One night around 9 not long ago, I was in my car, stopped at a red traffic signal over on Glebe Road in Arlington, VA. I had taken a few pictures of a woman in a car next to me (without her noticing me, by the way), and a gentleman in a pickup truck behind me did not like what I had done. He got out of his vehicle and approached.
The gentleman, with a baseball cap crooked on his head, was perturbed and angry and ferocious and maybe even salivating—I swear. He yelled, as if deranged: “What? Are you some kind of a pervert?”
I was scared, much more scared than I was during my first day of school in 1st grade, and I thought that had he a gun—a hand canon or an Uzi, maybe—he would ruthlessly and mercilessly shoot me and terminate my short-lived career as a humble, broke, art-making photographer. As it turned out, the gentleman did not have a hand canon or an Uzi ; or if he did, he didn’t take it out and point it at me and splatter my precious gray matter. That was fortunate, for I was in no mood to teach the gentleman a primer on the wonders and art and history of street photography, and there was more luck for me: The traffic signal changed to green, as if by miracle. I drove off to safety and a new freedom, but I have strayed from our topic: The Sunday picture of a most unfortunate man at Union Station.
I made this picture not because I wish to criticize our society for condoning homelessness and poverty. Nor did I take it to try to say through art that these tragedies are inexcusable and condemnable. No, I took it because I am selfish. I took it because I want to become rich and famous (probably just like you). I took it because I want to win a photography contest. I am submitting the photograph to a contest sponsored by the China Internet Information Center. The center is calling for pictures on poverty and poverty relief efforts, and I want to win it. As I said, I want fame.
My initial, straight, unedited version of this shot is good, but by no means a prize winner. I like the edited version I have posted here much better, although I doubt judges of the contest will go for it. The picture is unconventional and probably wouldn’t make sense if it were shown with a group of traditionally made photographs. The picture probably will make no sense to many while it is shown by itself here on this blog, now that I think about it; however, I think the photograph is a great work of art.
If it does catch on, keen critics might talk about it in the same breath as Pablo Picasso’s “The Old Guitarist,” which is one of its inspirations; and if you ask me, the picture ought to be hanging alongside this essay (as an art, art-essay sort of thing) in Washington’s Corcoran Gallery of Art or in the Hirshhorn Museum or, better still, in the East Wing of the National Gallery of Art, but who cares about a broke photographer’s grandiose ideas and opinions?
Now, let me contradict myself. Upon consideration, I think the damned thing—the damned picture, that is—just might help shame us all into eradicating homelessness and poverty. It might do this despite the contention of the many pessimists who conclude that these scourges—homelessness and poverty—are inherent to, and an incurable malady in, any human society.
–Tim Ruane
June 6 2012

3 dp (dupont circle, where joel works): No.3

3 dp (dupont circle, where joel works): No.3

3 dp (dupont circle, where joel works): No.2

3 dp (dupont circle, where joel works): No.2

3 dp (dupont circle, where joel works): No.1

3 dp (dupont circle, where joel works): No.1

walkers georgetown 1 pm dc

walkers georgetown 1 pm dc

That Is Not a Car in the Background 5

That Is Not a Car in the Background 5