Harry Potter (Daniel Radcliffe), the Chosen One, and his best friend Hermione Granger (Emma Watson) huddle together in the snow covered forest her Muggle parents took her as a young child. Hermione confides that these woods are as she remembered, but “We have changed”. Much has changed in “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part 1”. Gone are the days of innocence and the wonder of youth in the pursuit of true magic. “Deathly Hallows” veers dour and menacing. The Dark Lord Voldemort (charismatic evil Ralph Fiennes) declares, “I shall be the one to kill Harry Potter!” In this dark envisioning of J.K. Rowling’s final book: It is now “time to put away childish things”. David Yates expertly directs this, and the concluding Part 2, as he did in the previous 2 movies. “Deathly Hallows” is more craft than art.
We have all witnessed the journey of Harry, Hermione, and Ron (Rupert Grint) through the last 10 years and 6 books. Our children have grown up literally before our eyes. Director Yates is craftsman-like in his creation beholding to Steve Kloves’s screenplay laden with precision. I have not read the Rowling’s books. My bud Chuck told me that this movie is very loyal to the book—maybe painfully so. Although Yates’s creation is sturdy and captivating, he is not creating art. The score by Alexandre Desplat elicits the gravity and significance of the story. Yates and Kloves’s narrative is by the numbers, lacking an edge or sense of foreboding danger. Yates fails to leverage the most enticing dynamic of all: Whom does Hermione truly love? Ron? Harry? Singer Sting once said the most interesting love songs are about “I love you. You love someone else.” This also seems to be a glaring void.
Our young transforming heroes must risk all to protect avatar Harry, and check Voldemort from possessing the triad of the Deathly Hallows; thus making him “master of death”. “Harry Potter” has always embodied love and humanity. The narrative is ambitious in making palatable the vast amount of source material, and converging upon the eternal battle of good against evil. However, we don’t get much insight into Harry, Ron, and Hermione—characters we have all grown to love. Granted this is not the concluding act of this saga.
This is too bad, given that all have evolved into wonderful actors. Particularly, Emma Watson displays a self-aware loss of innocence and lonely sadness as Hermione. She is the emotional anchor as Harry expands into the hero he is fated. Daniel Radcliffe is both commanding and vulnerable as Harry. He nuances Harry’s fear of his own darkness. He must reconcile whether he is savior or merciless avenger. Voldemort killed his parents, and in twisted way defined Harry. Harry suffers the guilt of being powerless to stop Severus Snape (strong Alan Rickman) from killing his mentor Dumbledore (Michael Gambon). Radcliffe holds his own with the powerful Fiennes. Surprisingly, Harry does not say anything memorable as the emerging hero at this juncture. Grint as Ron tires of being Harry’s sidekick. Grint does his best to elevate Ron beyond the angst ridden teen finding his path and embracing true love, possibly with Hermione.
In “Deathly Hallows” our heroes leave the security of Hogwarts behind, and venture into the chaotic and unforgiving world. Lead by Hagrid (Robbie Coltrane) and “Mad Eye” Moody the young wizards and witches risk their lives to protect Harry from Voldemort and his minions, until Harry turns 17 years old. A malevolent conspiracy is brewing. Lord Voldemort has vanquished vestiges of his soul into vessels called Horcruxes, ensuring his immortality. Hermione uncovers Voldemort scheme, and determines that they must destroy all the Horcruxes. In the balance is Voldemort’s emergence as omniscient master of death and vanquisher of the Chosen One—Harry. “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows” has striking action and visuals; however, it is deathly slow for the first half. The movie redeems itself toward the end.
However, this may be more the calm before the storm and the concluding chapter. The “Deathly Hallows” is calculated and sturdy, but lacks a sense of wonder and magic that made the series classic. Perhaps, Part 2 risks and challenges all.
—
—