The Force Awakens was, like Citizen Kane, a “shallow masterpiece.”
—
As part of the generation that remembers standing in line for – and having my imagination broadened by – the original Star Wars, I knew going in that my reaction to The Force Awakens would be anything but indifference. The unexpected part, which took some time to put into perspective, was that the new movie initially brought to mind a particular quote by the late Pauline Kael. “A shallow masterpiece” was part of the legendary critic’s somewhat contentious assessment of the even more legendary movie Citizen Kane.
The film remains a joy because it’s hugely entertaining and never lets technique or showmanship get in the way of telling a very human story about coming to grips with history and destiny.
|
Kael’s usage of the phrase conveyed the view that, while she considered Citizen Kane a great movie, its cinematic sound and fury ultimately signified very little (and what little it did signify owed much more to co-writer Herman Mankiewicz than to Orson Welles). In a similar spirit, my embrace of the phrase was a convenient shorthand for my initial feeling that, for all its merits, The Force Awakens was as safe and conventional as could be.
◊♦◊
While I agree with Kael that Citizen Kane is a great movie, I don’t feel the need to offer caveats to my assessment. The film remains a joy because it’s hugely entertaining and never lets technique or showmanship get in the way of telling a very human story about coming to grips with history and destiny. Reflecting on this made me consider that The Force Awakens actually displays some thematic kinship with Welles’ film.
Whether they end with a deliberate enigma or an open-ended question, perhaps the mark of a “shallow masterpiece” is an ability to leave one wanting more.
|
Both are animated by a quest to understand – and indeed reclaim – the past. Like Thompson, the reporter in Citizen Kane trying to uncover the meaning of a legendary figure’s final words, Rey in The Force Awakens finds herself on a journey that brings her face to face with people she had always believed to be just legends. Though it trades jumps in time for jumps through hyperspace, the net effect is much the same. Virtually everyone Rey encounters – whether good or evil – is somehow struggling with the events of decades past.
For her part, Rey fares a bit better at the end of the movie than Thompson. Unlike the reporter, who’s left to speculate what Charles Foster Kane‘s dying words meant, Rey gets the chance to meet the past – personified by a silent Luke Skywalker – whose secrets will have to wait. Whether they end with a deliberate enigma or an open-ended question, perhaps the mark of a “shallow masterpiece” is an ability to leave one wanting more.
By Don Klees
Originally published on CultureSonar.
—
Photo: RKO Pictures
As it is, “Citizen Kane” has always been regarded as a visual-sonic landmark in movie history, not a narrative landmark, and Herman Mankiewicz can’t be credited for the film’s innovative uses of deep focus, camera movement, music, and sound effects, which influenced all movies afterwards. But with regards to the narrative itself, it’s theme of human grandiosity at odds with morality makes it thoroughly consistent with all the films Welles made afterwards, especially “The Magnificent Ambersons,” “The Lady from Shanghai,” “Touch of Evil,” “Macbeth,” “Othello,” and “Mr. Arkadin.” But to know that you have to be real film scholar, which… Read more »
Unfortunately, this anonymous author has to quote Pauline Kael’s worthless tome, which was made up of cherry-picking research and outright lies. Kael herself never gets around to defining what is a “deep” masterpiece, so the quality of her proposals have no value.