—
When I saw this picture posted in my stream earlier yesterday, there were plenty of people (okay, mostly men) who took away from the image, the idea that men being more empathetic meant somehow they were not willing to go to work, wanted to sit at home and get high while their women go out and get make money.
What lazy and unimaginative trolling. Why is it a crime when a man wants to interact with his children? Why is it wrong for a man to be tender and supportive? How does this make him less than a heroic individual? Hollywood much?
Who decided the best thing a man could do was to work himself to an early grave under the pretense that his presence was less important than being there for his family? Better to die, worked to death than to be there for your family? Better to die than to learn to clean house, wash a dish, cook a meal, do laundry because those are women’s work?
Losing your job doesn’t have to equal losing your life. The two shouldn’t be given equivalence in any way. Life is life. Work? Yeah, it needs to get done. You don’t live for it, you aren’t bonded to it in any symbiotic way. (Okay, technically we are) but for the sake of this argument, losing your job shouldn’t mean you take your OWN life as if you had nothing to live for.
Do you hear how that sounds? Insane.
As a man who has spent a huge portion of my son’s life in his presence, partially due to his autism, I feel as if a part of who I am would have remained underdeveloped without the experience. I remember how many hours I used to work. I would have seen my son for thirty minutes a day, five days a week. I have had ten times that amount of time. You feel differently about someone when you have that kind of great quality time.
I look at men who have not had the kind of time I have had with my son and feel a bit of pity for the poor bastards. (No, you fewking troll, I am not saying dads who only get weekend time with their kids don’t love them as much as I do. Geez. The implication was I wonder how many of them would, if they thought they could, cut their work time in half and how much happier many of them might be to spend that time with their family.)
I have begun to suspect much of what is wrong with the world is part of a cycle of men being detached from the next generation, the children they should be raising are instead left to strangers because of the myth of the 100 hour work week leading to fantastic wealth and opportunity.
The truth is less mentioned. Only one of ten thousand working parents will enjoy the benefits of this self-destructive grind. But the other nine thousand children will grow up without parental guidance, love, or understanding.
While one person moves into the next incredible tax bracket, the other nine thousand and nine hundred and ninety-nine of the next generation heads toward therapy, less sure of themselves, less well-grounded, less connected to their parents, and possibly mislead by people hoping to exploit their vulnerabilities.
Broken Manhood
Our society has altered our male consciousness enough that when men are unable to find work, to find a means to support their families, through no fault of their own, these men end up depressed, unhappy and more often now than ever, suicidal. They feel their contribution to the home MUST be money rather than retooling their minds, their lives and experiences to figure out new ways to contribute to society.
Or to consider that their current/former way of life may be gone forever…And that learning new skills, thinking about the world in new ways is not a sign of weakness. This trend isn’t going to slow. It’s going to continue to be an issue for the foreseeable future.
Why? Automation will continue to drive people from the workforce faster than we can train them. Thus the current model of male behavior is unsustainable.
Men must adapt and if you can’t see yourself doing so, you may end up being part of the other statistics: a man who dies from a heart attack, from hypertension, drug abuse, or suicide due to the depression brought on by society’s self-destructive cocktail of maleness.
The nature of this picture is talking about reclaiming a complete Human experience from a society interested in treating men as disposable; doing work far more dangerous than it has to be, such as coal mining, being injured in sports through debilitating long-term injuries through football or boxing.
This is talking about taking unnecessary risks in dangerous forms of entertainment which their manliness is considered endangered if they won’t risk lifelong injury for the sake of their supposed manhood.
Lives being thrown away in wars for resources or for political reasons which when seen in the light of day are little more than social aggrandizement of violence or cultural expediency. Telling young men to die for religion or for jingoistic foolishness should be the last way we should be expending lives.
If we indeed believe all lives are created equal and they all have the potential to reach the peak of the Human experience then this has nothing to do with staying home and not working. It has to do with the idea men need to consider a more balanced approach to living.
Our current lifestyle is both selfish and self-destructive.
No one is saying men should avoid work or stay at home while women work. This is about deepening our relationship with the inner self, to avoid the lazy machismo presented by our culture as the definitive way for men to behave.
To make men value their lives, their contribution to society as more than how fast they can work themselves to death, how dedicated they are to being exploited and ground into dust for the sake of an economic engine completely uninterested in your well-being.
To help men see they have other choices beyond self or sexual gratification to the exclusion of the humanity of others; to remove rape from the equation of choices that make up interactions between people. To make the idea of consent as reasonable as having cleaning air, clean water, and food to eat.
Men can and need to make other choices. Men can embrace their humanity, sensitivity, mental clarity, and emotional depth as part of their natural birthright. We need to realize that we need to change the nature of the question: What is the most valuable part of the Human experience?
No matter what you have been lead to believe, it isn’t money. Money is a tool, a resource which has been deified, making compassion, love, humanity a pale second.
It is the machismo of modern culture, the demand that men, place their personal honor, pride and belief in their innate superiority which is driving the nation toward greater divides, polarizing our relationships, forcing men into using fear as their weapon to separate people, cultures and pitting us against each other for the greater exploitation of the most destructive forms of capitalism.
We simply have to do better. We have to recognize the destructive cycle of greed, exploitation, manipulation and how if they are not managed and ultimately eradicated we face the end of our civilization, in the space of two perhaps three human lifetimes.
Unlike Humans in the past who thought the end was near, modern humanity has the real capacity to destroy their world while denying their culpability in any way.
When a man realizes the greatest strength he can show is compassion for others, only then is he ready for a family, protect a nation, or save a world.< —
This post was originally published on the author’s Medium blog and is republished here with his permission.
—
If you believe in the work we are doing here at The Good Men Project, please join like-minded individuals in The Good Men Project Premium Community.
◊♦◊
◊♦◊
Get the best stories from The Good Men Project delivered straight to your inbox, here.
◊♦◊
◊♦◊
Sign up for our Writing Prompts email to receive writing inspiration in your inbox twice per week.
♦◊♦
We have pioneered the largest worldwide conversation about what it means to be a good man in the 21st century. Your support of our work is inspiring and invaluable.
The Good Men Project is an Amazon.com affiliate. If you shop via THIS LINK, we will get a small commission and you will be supporting our Mission while still getting the quality products you would have purchased, anyway! Thank you for your continued support!
—
Photo credit: Pixabay
It’s not a stereotype if someone genuinely hate doing the dishes. They will do anything you not do dishes. Like buy disposable dishware, eat out, order delivery, or throw away the same cheap plasticware they use for everything once they can’t use it anymore. They’ll buy lots of canned food and instant ramen or fruit that doesn’t require using a plate. Then they live with someone who uses every dish and cutlery in existence… “Oh! The humanity!”. They cringe a little when a dish is used because they know thats eventually another future dish they don’t want to clean.
Am I the only person who is just disgusted by the stereotyping and man bashing here? It’s like drinking poison.
I know so many family men like Tom Brechlin (and like me) who do dishes and whatever else needs doing.
In the historical past, men, and in particular young men, were absolutely necessary for the continuation of the species. They protected the tribe, fought off invaders, brought meat, defended against predators. The best of them rose through the ranks. Getting more women to sire children. If a warrior was killed, it opened up a spot for another male to increase the likelihood of mating. One tough guy could mate with many women further increasing the tribe. All of this was a necessity. But that meme has continued to now, where it makes really little sense in the modern world. Most… Read more »
Things are changing back …. Sociologists have found that there is a larger percentage of millennials who “reject the superiority of the male-breadwinner family” has dropped from 83 percent in 1994 to 55-percent in 2014. And 58 percent of high school seniors said the best family is the one where men earn the money, and women take care of the home. Forty percent now believe that men “should make all the important decisions in the family.” I found several articles with supporting studies that state the same. I’ve said for a long time that many of the women who work… Read more »
It would be nice if employers would pay the husbands a generous salary so the wife can stay at home, but that is not going to happen.
Just out of curiosity, why would it be nice if just women got to stay home and their husband is the sole provider? Many people can do this just fine on whatever salary one of them makes. It’s all a matter of priorities. I know many 2 income high wage earners who are living paycheck to paycheck because they have put their priorities into high end homes and toys to feed an ego. And then bemoan that they can’t be there for their kids growing up. Not anybody else’s problem but their own.
I have no problem with women wanting to work if they want to; however, my beef is with employers who are too greedy in giving themselves good salaries while not paying people a good salary and have the audacity to put guilt on the parents for not being good providers for their families. In addition, the employer demands that the parents be on call 24 hours a day for business and then put guilt on the parents for not spending time with their kids. The employer also threatened to fire the parents if they want to go on vacation or… Read more »
I’ve found that a lot of employees enable employers. I just retired from a company where the employees were worked to the bone, accommodated ridiculous understaffing, all the while the company continued to make its profits. Sad part of it, employees were seldom compensated for their efforts. They’d get the same raise no matter what.
I couldn’t agree with you more. We live in a materialistic society that pushes the idea that “things” will make you happy. We live in what was once a nice middle class suburb which has gradually tuned into an upper class suburb. Homes are being torn down only to be replaced with monstrosities with 3 and 4 car garages. Needless to say that “day care” and live in nannies is a booming industry in my area. Pack the small children into their luxury imports and drag them to day care so that mom and dad can go make money to… Read more »
“I look at men who have not had the kind of time I have had with my son and feel a bit of pity for the poor bastards.” I’m sure there will be an article posted here any day now referring to women in a similar fashion. I’ll just wait. “fewking” You know you can swear on the internet, right “Men must adapt and if you can’t see yourself doing so, you may end up being part of the other statistics: a man who dies from a heart attack, from hypertension, drug abuse, or suicide due to the depression brought… Read more »
I’ve said for a long time … Women chooses to stay at home = choice. Man chooses to stay home = lazy bum
I’ll be with you in a minute, I have to dry my hands in that I just finished the dishes … I’m 62 years old and just recently retired because of health issues. I’ve done dishes for more years then I can count (married 43 years). My 6 brothers and I did dishes as soon as we were tall enough to reach the kitchen sink. I don’t know where the presumption came that men didn’t and don’t do domestic chores. Everyone I know do them including my wife. But then again we decided early on that I would be the… Read more »
Recycled trolling article…. why?
Trolling? Not “recycled”; promoted. Thanks for being a regular and noticing!
yep, tough nut to crack. Want a real challenge? Try to get a woman to pay for a date. Better yet, go on some woman’s site and promote this type of fallacy, or bash and accuse the entirety of womanhood as you’ve just done here with men and let me know how that works out for ya.
“What lazy and unimaginative trolling.”
Yep. was thinking the same thing as I read this essay…
Over here in Europe, women have no problem paying for dates – at least, most of those I dated didn’t have a problem with it. I can very well believe it may be different in the US.
If GMP wrote an article on that [women paying for dates] it’s one way they might “have the conversation nobody else is having”. We both know they won’t go for that. Man-bashing is fair game. Women must be treated as delicate flowers on a site that is supposed to be about men’s issues.
All of this, right here! Amen. Thank you!