—
In which John Green teaches you about Kurt Vonnegut’s most famous novel, Slaughterhouse-Five. Vonnegut wrote the book in the Vietnam era, and it closely mirrors his personal experiences in World War II, as long as you throw out the time travel and aliens and porn stars and stuff. Slaughterhouse-Five tells the story of Billy Pilgrim, a World War II veteran who was a prisoner of war, and survived the Battle of the Bulge and the fire-bombing of Dresden, goes home after the war, and has trouble adapting to civilian life (this is the part that’s like Vonnegut’s own experience). Billy Pilgrim has flashbacks to the war that he interprets as being “unstuck in time.” He believes he’s been abducted by aliens, and pretty much loses it. You’ll learn a little about Vonnegut’s life, quite a bit about Dresden, and probably more than you’d like about barbershop quartets as a metaphor for post traumatic stress.
—
—
Transcript Provided by YouTube:
00:00
Hi, I’m John Green, this is Crash Course Literature,
00:02
and today we’re gonna talk about Kurt Vonnegut’s Slaughterhouse Five.
00:05
Mr. Green, Mr. Green! You mean, like the Motown group that sings that song – glad all over!
00:10
No singing, Me From the Past! And no, it is not a Motown group! You’re thinking of the
00:14
Dave Clark Five, and for the record, they were not a Motown group, they were British.
00:18
[Theme Song]
00:27
So, Slaughterhouse Five, also known by its underappreciated alternate title, The Children’s
00:32
Crusade, is one of the most widely read antiwar books of the late twentieth century.
00:35
It was written by Kurt Vonnegut during the height of the Vietnam War, but this novel
00:39
is an attempt to chronicle the violence of the World War II bombing of Dresden and modern
00:43
warfare more broadly. But it’s important to understand, again, those two historical
00:48
contexts. The one in which the book was written and the one the book is about.
00:51
And the question at the heart of Slaughterhouse Five is what role can literature, particularly
00:55
works of literary fiction, play in addressing large scale acts of violence? What is the
01:01
role of literature in examining war? But of course that makes Slaughterhouse Five
01:05
sound very sad and serious, which it is, but it’s also a surprisingly and very weirdly
01:10
funny book. Let’s start with an outline of the main events of Slaughterhouse Five.
01:13
in the Thought Bubble. So, Vonnegut’s protagonist is Billy Pilgrim.
01:16
But rather than being on a linear journey toward a holy place, as his name might suggest,
01:21
Pilgrim has flashbacks (and fantasies) that he believes are actual time travel. Pilgrim
01:26
describes himself as being “unstuck in time.” And rather than describing his life events
01:31
in chronological order, he jumps between times and places.
01:35
The events that comprise Pilgrim’s disjointed narrative actually have quite a logical progression.
01:39
Like a rough outline of them looks like this: Pilgrim fought in World War II. He was a prisoner
01:44
of war in Germany. He was being held in Dresden when that city was largely destroyed by Allied
01:49
bombing toward the end of the war. And Pilgrim survived because he and his fellow prisoners
01:53
were held sixty feet underground in a former slaughterhouse. After the firestorm, Pilgrim
01:58
and his fellow detainees are put to work cleaning up the charred remains of bodies. And then
02:02
after the war, Billy Pilgrim has trouble returning to civilian life, spends some time in a mental
02:07
institution, but then eventually marries and becomes an optometrist.
02:10
A profession, it rather goes without saying, that involves sight.
02:13
Anyway, then Pilgrim has a breakdown while listening to a barbershop quartet, whose expressions
02:17
remind him of his guards at Dresden. He becomes convinced that aliens (Tralfamadorians) abducted
02:22
him and increasingly unmoored, Pilgrim publicly professes the Tralfamadorian vision of time and space.
02:28
Now Pilgrim’s narrative sounds a little crazy (especially since it’s delivered in such a nonlinear manner),
02:33
but Vonnegut makes the logic of his mental breakdown perfectly clear.
02:37
As such, Vonnegut creates a novel that demonstrates how war trauma affects the individual psyche.
02:43
Thanks, Thought Bubble. So, where did Vonnegut get all of these insights? Well in part, they
02:47
came from Vonnegut’s own experience in the war, as he acknowledges in the book. It’s
02:51
very interesting that the first and last chapters of Slaughterhouse Five are written in first
02:56
person from the perspective of Kurt Vonnegut. In the very beginning of the novel and at
03:01
the very end, he calls attention to the fact that we are reading a novel.
03:05
That’s an unusual and bold choice because generally as readers we want to forget that
03:08
we’re reading a story, right? And feel like we’re living inside reality. But Vonnegut wants
03:13
to unmoor us from our expectations of fiction, just as Billy Pilgrim is unmoored from time.
03:18
Kurt Vonnegut was born — Oh, it’s time for the open letter! Hey there, Kurt Vonnegut.
03:23
Dear Kurt Vonnegut, I actually met you once at the University of Alabama. My primary memory
03:28
of that evening is that someone came up to you and said, “Sir, you can’t smoke in
03:31
here.” And you replied, “Well, I can smoke or I can leave!”
03:35
You were and remain a great inspiration to me as a writer and one thing that I always
03:39
think about with you is that even though obviously you had a pretty screwed-up life, I always
03:44
felt like you had it figured out. Long story short, I love you Kurt Vonnegut.
03:48
Kurt Puppet: I love you too! John: Aw, thank you Kurt! Best wishes, John Green.
03:53
Anyway, Vonnegut was born in beautiful Indianapolis in 1922, he spent some time at Cornell University
03:59
before entering the United States army at the age of twenty. Like Billy Pilgrim, he
04:03
was shipped to Europe, had a very brief combat experience, and then became a prisoner of
04:07
war during the Battle of the Bulge, which you’ll remember from Crash Course history.
04:11
And then like Pilgrim, Vonnegut was sent to Dresden, where he was interred at a former
04:15
slaughterhouse. At the time, Dresden was considered a relatively safe place to be. In Slaughterhouse
04:19
Five, an English officer envies the American prisoners who are sent to Dresden, he says:
04:24
You needn’t worry about bombs […] Dresden is an open city. It is undefended, and contains
04:28
no war industries or troop concentrations of any importance.
04:32
But it turns out, of course, that in World War II, such things were not prerequisites
04:35
for getting bombed. Between February 13th and 15th of 1945, British
04:39
and American bombers dropped nearly 4,000 tons of bombs and incendiary devices on Dresden.
04:45
This created a firestorm that destroyed an enormous part of the city and cost tens of
04:49
thousands of lives. And then Dresden was subject to more air raids
04:52
of this sort in March and April. Now by all accounts, the suffering on the ground was tremendous.
04:57
But writers, artists, and historians have found it difficult to adequately convey the horrors that took place.
05:03
Vonnegut approaches the need to testify to these events in Slaughterhouse Five by using
05:08
a fictional narrative that seeks to both understand and evade the past.
05:12
Like although his narrator was in Dresden during the bombing and firestorm, he learns
05:16
what took place by eavesdropping on whispering guards.
05:19
And that’s a way of diminishing the immediacy of violence to rumor. Like Pilgrim reports
05:24
the guards’ conversation as follows: There was a fire-storm out there. Dresden
05:29
was one big flame. The one flame ate everything organic, everything that would burn.
05:34
This conversation of whispers, transmitted in a foreign language, and translated by the
05:38
author is remembered many years after the fact. And as readers, we have plenty of reason
05:43
to question it. I mean, just look at the vague nature of the
05:46
language used. Consider the repetition of “everything” (“…everything organic,
05:50
everything that would burn”). Well, “everything” is a pretty broad concept.
05:53
And in this context, it allows the narrator not to imagine the specific, horrible details.
05:58
Like here, vague language provides a stand-in for detailed testimony.
06:03
But there’s also something horrific and visceral about that idea generally. The idea
06:07
of “everything organic” burning. It implies the loss of not just our lives
06:11
but all life. Slaughterhouse Five also uses figures of speech
06:14
as a means of evasion. The sun was an angry little pinhead. Dresden
06:18
was like the moon now, nothing but minerals. I mean, just as you can’t look directly
06:23
at the sun, Billy Pilgrim can’t look directly at the destruction of Dresden.
06:26
He has to tell us what it’s like because what it is is unspeakable. And this sort of evasion
06:31
is very common in eyewitness reports of violence. In fact, Sebald chronicled how often eyewitness
06:37
reports of the bombing of German cities contained “stereotypical phrases.”
06:41
These clichés, he explains, “cover up and neutralize experiences beyond our ability to comprehend.”
06:48
The quote “unreal effect” that they produce is a very real depiction of how the human mind reacts to extreme suffering.
06:54
Here’s another example of trying to see the horror of war by not looking directly at it. Vonnegut describes the
07:00
post-bombing Dresden as a mute reflection in the contorted faces of prison guards, and he creates a
07:05
shocking and memorable image: The guards drew together instinctively, rolled
07:09
their eyes. They experimented with one expression and then another, said nothing, though their
07:15
mouths were often open. They looked like a silent film of a barbershop quartet.
07:20
So what does this say about the guards? What are we to make of the silence in this scene?
07:23
Why is it that the guards say nothing? Finally, why might Vonnegut use this goofy metaphor
07:29
of a barbershop quartet in a silent film at this particular moment? Are we supposed to
07:34
laugh at absurd moments like this or the repetition of the phrase “so it goes” whenever someone
07:38
dies? And if we do feel that instinct to laugh,
07:41
are we then meant to cringe at ourselves for having had that impulse?
07:45
Regardless, that image doesn’t go where we expect it to and so it’s designed to
07:48
make us uncomfortable. And that’s its power. That’s its beauty.
07:52
And it’s worth remembering that Vonnegut describes himself as often feeling speechless
07:56
when thinking about the bombing of Dresden. Like in the first chapter of Slaughterhouse
07:59
Five, he writes: I thought it would be easy for me to write
08:01
about the destruction of Dresden since all I would have to do would be to report what
08:05
I had seen. And I thought too it would be a masterpiece, or at least make me a lot of
08:09
money since the subject was so big. But not many words about Dresden came from my mind
08:14
then… and not many words come now, either. And it’s clear that Vonnegut has a pretty
08:17
complicated relationship with the words that eventually do, in fact, come. Like his novel,
08:23
famously, opens with the following lines: All this happened, more or less. The war parts,
08:28
anyway, are pretty much true. Pretty much true? That’s another phrase
08:32
that’s designed to make us uncomfortable. And as Vonnegut hints at in that passage I
08:35
just read, what does it mean for Vonnegut to gain acclaim and wealth for what he has written?
08:39
In an introduction to the 1976 edition of Slaughterhouse Five, Vonnegut expresses
08:43
some guilt at having benefited from its publication: The Dresden atrocity, tremendously expensive
08:49
and meticulously planned, was so meaningless, finally, that only one person on the entire
08:54
planet got any benefit from it. I am that person. I wrote this book, which earned a
08:59
lot of money for me and made my reputation, such as it is. One way or another, I got two
09:05
or three dollars for every person killed. Some business I’m in.
09:08
Now that’s a classic example of Vonnegut’s self-deprecating humor, but the “business”
09:12
of providing testimony does remain important work, I would argue — even if it is through
09:17
the flawed vehicle of narrative fiction. Precisely because it struggles to look directly
09:21
at the firebombing of Dresden, Slaughterhouse Five provides ways of thinking about how we
09:25
live and love and fight and heal. And it makes us think about how we frame the
09:30
stories that we tell ourselves about the past. And Billy Pilgrim’s unstuckness in time
09:35
reminds us that, as the great William Faulkner wrote, “The past isn’t dead. It’s not
09:39
even past.” Next week, we’ll talk about Billy Pilgrim’s
09:41
alternate universe filled with toilet-plunger aliens who offer a new perspective on the
09:45
violence of mankind. And we’ll discuss the philosophy of Tralfamadorians (a philosophy
09:50
summed up by the phrase, “and so it goes”). And, finally, we will consider what, if anything,
09:54
an “anti-war” can do about war, or really about anything else. Thanks for watching,
10:00
I’ll see you next week. Crash Course is made with the help of all
10:03
of these nice people, and it exists because of your support at Subbable.com, a voluntary
10:07
subscription service that allows you to support Crash Course directly so that we can keep
10:11
it free for everyone forever. You can also get great perks like signed posters,
10:14
so if you want to support Crash Course, please check it out. Thank you for watching, and
10:18
as we say in my hometown, don’t forget to be awesome.
—
This post was previously published on YouTube.