Matthew Rozsa, like Bernie Sanders, is sick of hearing about Hillary Clinton’s damn emails!
—
815 words into the Associated Press’s recent 949 word piece on Hillary Clinton’s email scandal, one will find a passage that should appear at the very beginning:
The FBI also is looking into Clinton’s email setup, but has said nothing about the nature of its probe. Independent experts says it’s unlikely Clinton will be charged with wrongdoing, based on details that have surfaced so far and the lack of indications that she intended to break laws.
Since the start of the 2016 election cycle, I have been highly conflicted about Clinton’s presidential campaign. Of the three candidates seeking the Democratic nomination, she is easily the most conservative, and there is plenty of evidence that she has used her establishment connections to rig the contest in her favor before a single ballot has been cast. Although her extensive experience makes her abundantly well-qualified for the presidency and I would support her over any of the Republican alternatives, she certainly isn’t my first choice.
At the same time, as Bernie Sanders once put it, I am sick and tired of hearing about her damn emails. The latest revelations change none of that.
Yes, it has been revealed that that 22 emails sent from Clinton’s private server contained highly classified information. Yes, this was a major faux pas on her part, and to paraphrase Washington lawyer Bradley Moss (who specializes in security clearance matters), she should feel humbled by her mistake.
At the same time, the headlines are plastered with declarations like those of former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay, who insists that the FBI is ready to indict her (a rich claim coming from a man who was indicted in 2005 on criminal charges of conspiracy to violate election law). Former House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa made the same claim, despite his own role in hounding Clinton during the discredited Benghazi hearings. Left and right, pundits seem to agree that this news could be catastrophic for her presidential campaign, coming as it does a mere three days before the Iowa caucuses will take place. As CBS News aptly put it, “Hillary Clinton is in damage control over new information about the private email server she used as secretary of state.”
None of this is warranted.
For one thing, Clinton herself has consistently called for all of her emails to be released to the public. Even though the media has made it seem as if there is little dispute that these 22 emails would jeopardize American national security, there is plenty of reason to believe that the ongoing controversy is really one over bureaucratic labeling. Some government officials believe that the emails should have been highly classified and others don’t, but it is hardly definitive that Clinton did anything wrong. What IS certain, though, is that Clinton didn’t think she had done anything wrong. If that had been the case, she would have pushed for those emails to be suppressed even as the rest of her material was publicized. Similarly, it would not have taken the State Department almost a year to reach the conclusion that these were highly classified.
Beyond this, though, there is something downright unseemly about the media’s determination to have this issue become a major factor in the Democratic primary process. Sanders put it best in a statement released by his campaign on Friday:
“There is a legal process in place which should proceed and not be politicized. The voters of Iowa and this nation deserve a serious discussion of the issues facing them.”
That, really, is the bottom line. If Clinton is denied the Democratic nomination, it should be as a result of the voters carefully evaluating her views and finding them wanting. Her ability to perfectly navigate through the State Department bureaucracy without so much as cracking a single eggshell, on the other hand? Anyone who says that this should determine her fitness for the presidency is either (a) already biased against her or (b) not conducting nearly enough research on the subject.
Then again, who can really blame them? Even the AP doesn’t think the fact that this is a non-scandal matters enough to appear until the very end of their reporting.
Source: 30dB.com – Hillary Clinton and Emails


Jesus christos. I just heard hillary’s iowa speech. A freaking herbert hoover chicken in every pot. And you all know how That turned out. Cmon Matt. Give me a bone here . Shes a godwaful loser. Secy of state against a 74 year old socialist. . She will have her ass handed to her on a silver platter in new Hampshire. Forget about south carolina. GNow watch her rhetoric change to the 60’s idealism. The kids. The youth. Shes a fraud matt and you know it too. Id take any democrat who was homest. Bernie at least is honest. I… Read more »
For heaven’s sake. Please give me two reasons why would any democrat vote in favor of Hillary Clinton? The first reason is because we want to beat Republicans. Got it. And the other reason is truly what??? Yup. I love a liar running my country. Odd. I thought you believed that about bush. Sorry dudes. I asincerely not getting you. Jesus. Anybody else is a step up. Even a Republican. Sandets at least is honest. But you choose liars. Unbelievable.
“What IS certain, though, is that Clinton didn’t think she had done anything wrong.”
Wow, Secretary of State didn’t realize that it was most likely illegal. It wasn’t one e-mail accidentally sent out from her own server. It wasn’t a mistake. Sure Clinton could call for the e-mails to be released since she knows that they won’t at least until after the elections. That shouldn’t have any bearing on her fitness for office, but her time as Secretary of State should?
It’s only National Security, it’s not like the US IS AT WAR 8?/ ? the ‘STUPID’ should be more painful for its’ owners
We can’t ignore wrong doing of a politician because those that support her are tired of it.
Bullshit. This is her years and years of arrogance come home to roost. If you or i let one of those emails out Matt we’d be in Leavenworth by now with no key to be found. Did you ever have top sectet clearance Matt? I have. We knew classified data just by looking at it. Didn’t need to be marked. If you passed it through the first thing they looked at was treason. Then they considered stupidity. Trust me other than prison stupidity killed your career as effectively. Matt in this case your bias i think is absolutely indefensible. It… Read more »
The hillarious thing here is that Matt just posted an article saying how sick and tired he is of incompetence. And he is studying to be a historian.
Don’t you think Clinton knows that the classified emails won’t be released and her calls to release them are just a ploy? I’m more interested in whether any of the classified emails are leaked to the press. If so, it might indicate that there really was nothing to hide.