—
This content is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal advice.
Car accidents aren’t always major collisions and many are actually just fender benders or low-speed crashes. These smaller accidents are almost more confusing than larger accidents, as determining who was at fault tends to be more complicated. Considering the long-term effects of a car accident aren’t always physical, rather sometimes financial, learning how comparative negligence comes into play is important. This legal principle will impact how much compensation a driver can receive based on their share of fault in the accident. Explore the ins and outs of comparative negligence, the different legal systems, how fault comes into play, and when hiring a lawyer may be the right choice.
What is Comparative Negligence?
For those who are unfamiliar, comparative negligence is a legal principle that assigns fault in a car accident according to each party’s contribution to the crash. If both drivers share the same level of responsibility, their compensation will be adjusted accordingly. Should one driver be found to be 20% at fault in an accident, their compensation will be reduced by 20% as a result. This helps to ensure that damages are allocated fairly based on each party’s level of negligence.
Comparative negligence differs from contributory negligence, though, which is a stricter rule where a driver who is even 1% at fault for an accident may be denied compensation entirely. Due to these differences, it’s important to outline how fault is assigned in the state you live in.
Types of Negligence Systems in the U.S.
Every state follows a different negligence system in accordance with their state laws, with these different systems determining how compensation is calculated when both parties share fault. Under pure comparative negligence, for instance, drivers can recover damages even if they are 99% at fault for the accident and the compensation is reduced based on the percentage of fault.
California, Florida, and New York are examples of states which follow the above system. Modified comparative negligence is slightly different, though, and only allows a driver to recover damages if they are less than 50% or 51% at fault depending on the state. Texas, Georgia, and Illinois are common examples of these states, with drivers crossing that percentage threshold being unable to recoup damages.
Under a contributory negligence structure, a driver being even 1% at fault may receive no compensation. This is the strictest of all the systems and states including Alabama, Maryland, and Virginia are examples of those who follow this system. Naturally, the system your state uses will have a direct impact on how much compensation you can receive after an accident which makes it crucial to know the laws in your state.
How Comparative Negligence Affects Compensation
The percentage of fault that is assigned to each driver will affect the final compensation they receive under a comparative negligence structure. To add some perspective, say there is an accident where a driver is 30% at fault and they suffered $100,000 in damages. Under this structure, their reward would be reduced by 30% and they would only receive $70,000.
Insurance companies are known for using comparative negligence to lower settlement payouts, with an insurer even being able to argue that if you were partially at fault then they can reduce how much they owe you. This is why having strong legal evidence and support can be critical in an accident claim.
Proving Fault in Small Car Accidents 101
In minor car accidents, proving fault will be essential to getting fair compensation. The following items can go a long way in helping you prove your case:
- Police reports: Officers document accident details and may assign fault in their reports
- Witness statements: Third-party accounts provide unbiased perspectives on how the accident happened
- Dashcam footage: Video evidence can clearly show which driver was responsible
- Accident scene photos: Skid marks, vehicle damage, and road conditions can provide clues about fault
Insurance companies and attorneys use this evidence to negotiate fault percentages accordingly. If fault happens to be disputed, a lawyer can help to challenge an unfair assessment.
Common Scenarios Where Comparative Negligence Applies
There are many minor car accidents that involve some degree of shared fault where comparative negligence comes into play. Rear-end collisions typically involve the rear driver being at fault, but if the lead driver suddenly brakes without reason and causes the crash then they may partially share responsibility.
Additionally, intersection accidents are another example where two drivers may be at fault. If they both entered the intersection at the same time and collided, for instance, both may be assigned partial fault, especially if one of the two ran a yellow light. Likewise, if a driver switches lanes without signaling and another driver hits them, then both could share fault.
Parking lot accidents are another scenario that is often overlooked, but backing out of a space and hitting another vehicle can result in shared blame depending on the circumstances. All of these scenarios illustrate why fault isn’t black and white in minor accidents which makes comparative negligence a key factor in settlements.
When to Hire a Lawyer
For minor car accidents, it’s not always necessary to call a lawyer, but it can certainly be helpful in certain situations. For example, consider reaching out to an accredited lawyer if any of the below is true:
- Fault is disputed: If the other driver or insurance company argues that you were more at fault than you believe, a lawyer can help protect your claim.
- The insurance company is offering a low settlement: If the compensation doesn’t cover all your expenses, legal help may be needed.
- You’re in a modified comparative negligence state: If your fault percentage is near the 50% or 51% threshold, a lawyer can help argue for a lower percentage to keep you eligible for compensation.
Even for small claims, an attorney can negotiate a better settlement and ensure that you aren’t unfairly blamed for the accident.
Protect your rights following a wreck
Comparative negligence exists to play a crucial role in determining fault and compensation even in minor car accidents. The percentage of fault assigned can significantly impact how much compensation a driver recovers, with different states following varying rules that affect claims. By understanding how comparative negligence works and gathering strong evidence, drivers can better protect their rights after a crash.
—
