What the Bible’s Awkward Silence on Certain Issues Is Trying to Tell Us

I still remember the Sunday I said it out loud.

It wasn’t a throwaway line. It was something I’d wrestled with for weeks — months, really — buried in commentaries, poring over Greek and Hebrew, reading every passage that supposedly addressed the issue. By the time I stepped into the pulpit, I knew exactly what I was going to say, and I knew it wouldn’t land quietly.

“The Bible doesn’t say premarital sex is a sin.”

You could feel the air change. Some people leaned in. Others sat back, arms folded. A few stared like I’d just confessed to being the Antichrist.

I hadn’t said it to be edgy. I wasn’t trying to win points with the rebellious or make headlines in the local paper. I said it because I couldn’t find it in the text. What I found instead was… silence. Not ambiguity. Not a verse hiding somewhere in the genealogies. Just… nothing.

And that silence unnerved me.

Because I was told from the moment I understood what sex was, that sex was for monogamous heterosexual marriages. Anything outside of that was sin, full stop. No discussion. No nuance. No questions.

So when I couldn’t find the clear prohibition I’d always assumed was there, it rattled more than just one belief. It shook the way I’d been taught to read the Bible. I’d been taught all my life that the Bible had a clear, divinely inspired position on everything. If Scripture didn’t address something as loudly as we preached about it, then what did that mean? Were we filling in the blanks with our own opinions? Were we speaking where God had chosen to stay quiet?

That morning, I realised the awkward truth: some of our loudest moral positions are built on verses that don’t exist.

When the Bible Says Nothing

That Sunday wasn’t the last time I noticed it. Once you see one gap, you start spotting them everywhere. Whole sermons, church policies, and theological hills we’re willing to die on — all built on verses that simply aren’t there.

And yet, we preach them with confidence. We pass them down as if Moses himself carried them on stone tablets. We treat them like core truths, forgetting they might be nothing more than cultural assumptions, denominational traditions, or interpretations stretched well past their original intent.

So let’s talk about some of the places where Scripture stays quiet. No command. No prohibition. No direct teaching. Just awkward silence. And maybe, if we’re willing to listen closely, we’ll find that the silence itself is trying to tell us something.

The One-Handed Sin

Masturbation. There, I said it.

As a youth pastor, I lost count of how many young men asked me about it. They wanted to know if it was a sin, if it would damage their relationship with God, if they’d be “pure” enough for marriage. And they wanted a clear, biblical answer.

The problem was, there isn’t one.

I was told it was sinful. Not just frowned upon, but a moral failure that could derail your spiritual life. I was taught to suppress it, to resist every urge, to repent in shame when I failed, and to assume that every time it happened, God was both watching and deeply disappointed.

So, I did what any guilt-ridden Christian leader would do: I went hunting for the verse. Surely it was in there somewhere, tucked away in Paul’s letters, buried in the laws of Leviticus, or at least hinted at in one of Jesus’ parables.

What I found instead was… nothing. Not a single explicit mention. The best anyone could do was point to the story of Onan in Genesis, a man who “spilled his seed” on the ground and was struck dead. But that’s not about masturbation. It’s about Onan’s refusal to fulfill a specific cultural duty and the injustice of exploiting his sister-in-law without giving her the security that the law required. In other words, not exactly a proof text for teenage guilt.

And yet, churches have built entire purity narratives around it, treating an unmentioned act as one of the great moral failures of youth. We turned silence into law and called it holiness.

The Bible’s Missing Diagnosis

Depression. Anxiety. PTSD. Bipolar disorder. You can read the Bible cover to cover and never find those words.

And yet, the evidence of mental and emotional struggle is everywhere. Elijah collapses under a broom tree and asks God to take his life. David fills the Psalms with language of despair and hopelessness. Jeremiah curses the day he was born. Even Jesus, in Gethsemane, says His soul is “overwhelmed with sorrow to the point of death.”

Despite all this, somewhere along the way, mental illness became taboo in the church. It was reframed as a sign of spiritual weakness, proof that Satan had gotten the upper hand, that your faith wasn’t strong enough, that you hadn’t prayed enough, believed enough, or claimed enough victory.

In some circles, it’s gone even further. People are discouraged from seeking medical treatment, told to “trust God” instead of taking medication, warned that therapy might lead them away from the truth. The unspoken rule is that if you just read your Bible more, prayed harder, and resisted the devil, you’d be fine.

The result? Struggling believers end up hiding their pain, too ashamed to admit what they’re going through, terrified of being judged as unspiritual or demon-oppressed. And when the help they actually need could be found in a doctor’s office or a counsellor’s chair, they stay trapped in silence because the church has confused medical reality with moral failure.

The Bible never treats human anguish as a reason for shame. But for too long, the church has spoken where Scripture stays quiet, and in doing so, we’ve added a burden Jesus never asked anyone to carry.

The Gospel According to Grape Juice

Growing up, I didn’t just learn that drunkenness was wrong. I learned that any alcohol was basically one slippery sip away from ruining your witness. In my church, communion was served with grape juice, not wine, because, well… Jesus might have turned water into wine, but we weren’t about to risk it.

The message was clear: good Christians don’t drink. Ever. If you did, you were either backsliding, compromising, or not really saved in the first place. In fact, a fun piece of trivia about me is that I didn’t start drinking until I was well into my thirties.

So imagine my surprise when I realised the Bible never says drinking is a sin. Not once. It warns about drunkenness. It talks about the dangers of excess. It calls for wisdom and self-control. But it never prohibits the act of drinking itself.

In fact, wine is woven through the story of Scripture. It’s part of sacred celebrations like Passover. Psalm 104 thanks God for giving wine “to gladden the human heart.” Jesus’ first miracle was keeping a wedding party going by making more wine, and according to the story, it was the good stuff. And in one of the most practical moments in the New Testament, Paul tells Timothy: “Stop drinking only water, and use a little wine because of your stomach and your frequent illnesses” (1 Timothy 5:23).

Somewhere along the way, many churches took the Bible’s warnings about excess and rewrote them as a blanket ban. They spoke where Scripture stays quiet, often out of genuine concern for addiction, but ended up preaching a rule God never made.

The result? People who enjoy alcohol in moderation either carry unnecessary guilt or hide it, and those who struggle with it are often too ashamed to seek help. We replaced discernment with prohibition, and in doing so, we turned a silence into a law.

The Unequally Yoked Myth

When I was a youth pastor, the rule was simple: don’t date non-Christians. And the proof text was always the same:“Do not be yoked together with unbelievers” (2 Corinthians 6:14). It was presented like a mic drop. Case closed. End of discussion.

The message was that dating someone outside the faith was dangerous, disobedient, and a guaranteed path to backsliding. If you so much as caught feelings for a non-Christian, you were urged to “guard your heart” and shut it down.

The problem? That verse isn’t about dating at all. Paul is writing about partnerships that compromise the integrity of your faith, most likely tied to idol worship and temple practices in Corinth. It’s about aligning yourself so closely with someone or something that your values get pulled out of shape. The metaphor comes from farming: you don’t yoke two animals of different strength or size because they can’t pull in the same direction.

Could that principle apply to marriage? Sure. Could it be relevant for dating? Possibly. But that’s an application, not the original meaning. And when we preach an application like it’s the direct word of God, we end up treating a silence as if it’s a command.

The Bible never explicitly says, “Thou shalt not date a non-Christian.” That’s a conclusion we’ve drawn, sometimes out of wisdom, sometimes out of fear. The danger comes when we present our conclusion as God’s command, and people discover it’s not actually in the text. Because when they start to see what else we’ve overstated, it’s not just our dating rules they stop trusting.

The Four-Letter Lie

When I was a kid, I thought holiness was partly about vocabulary. Good Christians didn’t drink, didn’t smoke, and definitely didn’t swear. If you let a four-letter word slip, you might as well have just denied Christ in front of the whole playground.

The proof text was usually Ephesians 4:29: “Do not let any unwholesome talk come out of your mouths.” That verse was wielded like a divine swear jar, shutting down anything with too many consonants and not enough church acceptability.

The problem? Paul wasn’t talking about swear words. The Greek word for “unwholesome” literally means “rotten” or “corrupting.” He’s talking about speech that tears people down, spreads gossip, sows division, or drips with contempt. By that standard, you can be perfectly “clean” in your vocabulary and still be wildly unbiblical in the way you talk to people.

The Bible never lists which words are off-limits. It doesn’t provide a glossary of banned expressions. What it does care about is the heart and impact behind your words. Yet somehow, we reduced all of that to a handful of forbidden syllables and decided God cared more about whether you said “damn” than whether you slandered someone behind their back.

When we turn cultural manners into divine mandates, we miss the point and we risk making Jesus sound like a cranky language teacher instead of the One who calls us to speak truth in love.

The Modesty Police

I grew up hearing that “modest is hottest” and that Christian girls should cover up “so they don’t cause their brothers to stumble.” Hemlines, necklines, swimsuit choices… all spiritual matters, apparently.

The favourite proof texts were 1 Timothy 2:9 and 1 Peter 3:3, which talk about women dressing modestly. But read them in context, and they’re not about hiding your body to keep men from sinning. They’re about rejecting ostentatious, wealth-flashing clothing and focusing on good works instead of status symbols.

In their original setting, these instructions were cultural laws: specific to a time, place, and social order. Paul was addressing the realities of first-century Greco-Roman life, where women’s clothing signalled class, wealth, and status in ways that disrupted the witness of the early church. These weren’t universal, God-for-all-time dress codes. They were pastoral guidance for a particular community in a particular moment.

But somewhere along the way, the church took those cultural instructions and rebranded them as divine decrees. We drew measuring lines on skirts, banned certain swimsuits, and turned “modesty” into a checklist that had more to do with cultural comfort than biblical holiness.

The irony? In obsessing over women’s clothing, we often shifted the responsibility for men’s lust onto women’s bodies, and taught both sexes to see modesty as an external measurement instead of an internal posture of humility. We made God sound like a Victorian chaperone instead of a Father who sees the heart.

The Sinner’s Prayer Scam

If you grew up in evangelical culture, you’ve probably heard it: “Just pray this prayer after me, and you’ll be saved.” We called it the Sinner’s Prayer, and it was the gold standard of altar calls.

The only problem? It’s not in the Bible.

Yes, Scripture talks about repentance, faith, and confessing Jesus as Lord. Yes, prayer is central to our relationship with God. But the idea that salvation is secured by repeating a pre-written set of words is something we made up. It’s tidy, it’s trackable, and it fits nicely into a church report but it’s not how the early church understood conversion.

In reality, the Sinner’s Prayer is a modern cultural law. It was developed in revivalist movements of the 19th and 20th centuries to create clear moments of decision in large gatherings. It worked for that context, but over time, we stopped saying, “This is how we help people respond to the gospel,” and started saying, “This is how you get saved.”

And that’s the danger with cultural laws: they might start as tools, but if we’re not careful, they become requirements God never made. We start treating them like divine mandates, and when people discover they’re not actually in Scripture, it can shake their trust in everything else we’ve taught.

The gospel is bigger than a formula, and salvation is deeper than a script. But until we’re willing to admit where we’ve elevated our own methods to God’s law, we’ll keep mistaking our traditions for truth.

Learning to Listen to What Scripture Doesn’t Say

When we only focus on what the Bible does say, it’s easy to miss the power of what it leaves unsaid. Those silences aren’t oversights. They’re invitations to use wisdom, to seek the Spirit’s guidance, and to remember that Scripture was written in real times and places, often addressing specific cultural issues, not drafting a universal rulebook for every situation we face today.

The danger comes when we rush to fill the silence with our own laws. Sometimes we do it to protect people, sometimes to keep order, sometimes just to make things feel clear and manageable. But once those cultural rules get stamped with God’s authority, they become burdens He never asked us to carry and too often become barriers that keep people from Him.

So here’s the takeaway. When you encounter a topic the Bible doesn’t speak to directly, slow down. Look at the wider biblical story. Pay attention to the cultural context. Have honest conversations with wise and diverse voices. And most of all, ask how love, justice, and mercy — the things Jesus made crystal clear — might guide you.

Listening to what Scripture doesn’t say keeps us humble. It helps us hold our convictions without confusing them for God’s commands. And maybe that’s the real gift of the Bible’s silences. They remind us to stop speaking for God, and start listening for Him instead.

Dan Foster is the author of “Leaving Church, Finding God: Discovering Faith Beyond Organized Religion.”

The Backyard Church is not just a blog. It’s a real online community for people who have faith but can’t, don’t, or won’t go to church. Join today.

For more articles on life, faith, and spirituality, Sign-up for my newsletter. Also, feel free to send questions and story ideas to [email protected]

—

This post was previously published on MEDIUM.COM.

—