The Fight Against Data Centers Is Bringing Americans Together

These days, it seems as though there are new data centers being proposed and built everywhere.

Tech companies have long relied on these gigantic server warehouses to process massive amounts of digital data. But a race to develop AI, championed by President Donald Trump, has fed a sharp surge in construction.

The problem is, no one really wants to live near one. Three quarters of Americans surveyed in August say they oppose data centers. That’s up from 42 percent a year earlier.

Data centers use up lots of land — largely in rural America. They use inordinate amounts of water for cooling, eat up power and pollute our air, and generate heat in an already-warming climate. So anyone concerned with their most basic needs — land, water, air, electricity, and the climate — is justifiably concerned about data centers.

Data centers are also physical symbols of the way in which AI companies are gambling away our economic stability.

“They are pushing to move as quickly as possible, to throw as much money at this as possible, basically offering open bribes to governments at all levels — local, state, and federal — to get these things approved and built,” Thomas Meyer, Deputy Political Director at Food & Water Watch, told me.

Even mainstream economists are warning about a massive “AI bubble,” which could take the entire system down with it when it bursts. (South Korea, where that bubble may already be bursting, offers a real warning to the United States.)

The good news, Meyer says, is “there has been tremendous grassroots pushback and opposition to data centers in all parts of the country.” Meyer’s organization is one of hundreds that have joined the newly formed Stop Data Centers Coalition, which unites local fights against data centers in urban and rural areas across the country. Many of these struggles have enjoyed varying degrees of success.

What’s really needed is a national moratorium on data centers, as outlined in a letter to Congress signed by the coalition’s partners.

Partisan gridlock in Congress, and President Trump’s full-throated support of AI companies, stands in the way of a national ban for now. But this spring, environmental organizations defeated a bill called the “Protect American AI Act” that would have carved out environmental loopholes for data centers.

Meanwhile, activists are pushing ahead at the state and local levels.

Residents in Maine pushed legislators to pass what would have been the first state-wide moratorium on data centers earlier this year (although Governor Janet Mills vetoed the bill).

The fight against data centers fared better in New York, where state lawmakers passed a similar moratorium. Governor Kathy Hochul, who has championed AI technology, has yet to sign the bill. But in the meantime, she signed an executive order issuing a one-year pause to allow time to develop regulations. “We are still pushing her to sign that bill because it’s a bit stronger than the executive order,” said Meyer.

Meyer pointed out that more than a dozen states are considering similar moratoria, and bans have already taken effect in many local communities. “Several hundred places have enacted moratoriums of different kinds of shapes and sizes,” said Meyer — including Sarasota County in Florida, and the cities of Minneapolis and Spokane. Monterey Park, California, stands out for being the first in the nation to enact a permanent ban passed by voters.

Trump unashamedly centers industry talking points in his executive order, casting data center construction and AI technology as a “race” to be won. But the real race appears to be for tech companies to build data centers in as many communities as possible before residents can stop them.

And that’s exactly why we need a moratorium.

—

Previously Published on otherwords.org with Creative Commons License

***

At The Good Men Project, we are proud to syndicate work from OtherWords, a public-interest editorial service published by the Institute for Policy Studies. We value their work because it brings readers clear, accessible, fact-checked commentary on the policies and power structures shaping everyday life, often from voices and perspectives that do not get nearly enough mainstream attention.

We believe these conversations belong here because questions about democracy, inequality, justice, rights, and public responsibility are not separate from the human story. They shape how families live, how communities function, who gets heard, who gets protected, and what kinds of values a culture rewards. Many of the issues OtherWords covers also overlap with questions we care deeply about at GMP: power, identity, belonging, care, fairness, and how to build a society that is more humane than the one we inherited. That is one reason we are glad to share their work with our readers.