—
This content is for informational purposes only and is not intended to provide legal advice.
It’s not uncommon for fights to break out, especially when you consider the volatile political climate that we find ourselves in. Most people know all too well how quickly things can get out of hand, as evident in last year’s Minneapolis riots. Even during lawlessness, the law rules over the land, and any criminal act performed during these times will be prosecuted. One general principle of the law is that no person may inflict harm upon another; yet, the law also provides that citizens have the right to protect themselves.
The question we now raise is: what are the boundaries that separate personal injury from self-defense? To answer this question, we need to understand a few basic elements:
Imminent Threat
This element states that for a defendant to be able to successfully claim self-defense, the threat that was present should have been enough to make the defendant believe that he was about to be harmed. A threat can be made through words and actions. Note, however, that the claim of self-defense is only viable while the assailant remains a threat. It follows that once the threat is neutralized, the use of force is no longer necessary, and if the defendant continues to use force, he then becomes the aggressor.
Reasonable Fear
It must also be established that the threat was enough to cause reasonable fear in the defendant. The basis is whether the threat, when evaluated by a reasonable person, would be enough to cause fear and panic in the person. It is in this regard that perception takes precedence over actual danger. For example, if someone brandished a realistic toy machete, force may be applied to neutralize the perceived danger.
Proportional Force
Finally, the third basic element is that the defendant must have responded to the threat with a force that is proportionate to the threat. A defendant may not use lethal force to repel a non-lethal attack. In instances when firearms are involved, if the defendant reasonably believed he was about to get shot, and in response, fired preemptively, this would still be considered proportional force.
It’s also important to understand that there are laws that promote the right to defend oneself. These are some of the best examples:
The Duty to Retreat
This law states that a person who is attacked must first attempt to flee from the attacker before using force to protect himself. It’s inherently difficult to use this law as a defence without help from seasoned lawyers like the ones from the Law Offices of Kamela James.
The Stand Your Ground Law
The stand your ground law enables defendants to claim self-defense even without an attempt to flee.
The Castle Doctrine
States that impose the duty to retreat do not necessarily leave their citizens incapable of defending themselves. This doctrine states that any resident has the right to use deadly force if a person unlawfully enters their home.
It’s important to check the self-defense laws that apply to your state as they vary between states and it’s also important to factor in the gun laws that apply to your state as these factors can heavily sway things in or away from your favour.
—
