Jessica Bahr unpacks some of the assumptions behind femmephobia, and how devaluing women devalues men on a fundamental level.
(Inspired by the article called, The Opposite of ‘Man’ is ‘Boy,’ Not ‘Woman,’ by Hugo Schwayer, published in Jezebel and The Good Men Project)
I like this article for what it illuminates. However, the deeper issue, which Hugo alludes to, but doesn’t really address, is that men find it so insulting to be associated with anything feminine, and will avoid this association at all costs (this starts in boyhood). There in lies the major problem, one that hurts both genders, and also rips them apart. This fear of the feminine not only disrespects and marginalizes women and anything female (which shows up in a litany of ways – from the subtle to the brutal), it also cuts men off from their full spectrum of humanity, which includes the “feminine” qualities, and in fact demonizes these qualities (leaving men behind developmentally, spiritually, emotionally, sexually, and psychologically), and leaves relationships asunder in the wake.
How unfair to everyone and what a war of separateness this mentality wages on humanity. And the fight to bridge that great divide seems futile to anyone who tries, given the deeply entrenched conditioning around it – making sure everyone knows their place…and if it’s feminine – it’s not a good one. That is the underlying message. And as the article notes, over-compensating hyper masculinity isn’t working out well (!).
In general, women don’t have a problem with being told they have masculine qualities, or performing what has traditionally been deemed masculine or manly, in fact it’s something we’ve strived for to gain equal footing, believing we would finally be valued for being able to offer what the culture values. We also had to do it out of necessity to survive in a patriarchal world that wasn’t showing any signs of accommodating or accepting feminine ways of being anytime soon.
It starts simply enough – as a kid, I remember playing video games with my male friends and them refusing to be a female character in the game (not that there were many to choose from back then – and the ones today are pornified caricatures), and often I had no choice but to play the male character, and I didn’t think twice about it…there was no shame in it for one, and two, well, I guess I was desensitized to the idea of simply not having my gender represented in that and many other ways (especially empowering ones). It was like we didn’t matter…and if you wanted to play, you became a boy in whatever way you needed to, to feel safe and/or comfortable…more accepted. But it was never the reverse.
Also in my youth (and I’m sure it hasn’t changed), I remember it was the worst insult for boys to call each other a girl. I remember feeling so much hurt and pain when I heard this – from a very early age…almost as if a foreigner in a strange land. At times it was shocking, numbing. I felt like I was seen as less than and as something/someone they did not want to be like in anyway shape or form, and also that to be a girl was an embarrassment overall to the very society that bore her. And the fact that this behavior was normalized made it worse.
That is a lot of shame to internalize just for having been born with a vagina. A projected shame, not our own. So I constantly was undoing in myself what was being projected onto me by the culture, and even by the people I loved. As a tomboy, I was always proving that I could be both; both protecting my girl-ness and doing what it took to fit in and be taken seriously, which ironically meant having to subdue my femaleness at times and act like a boy. But I knew early on that I could not and would not accept that blatant disparity and discrimination for the part of me that was feminine; that was my birthright – and that I would find ways to live in a female bashing society, while not selling myself out. It’s an ongoing feat.
As I got older I learned that there was a “feminine” aspect that was accepted and “valued” in our culture after all – and it had to do with prettiness and sexualization. That version of feminine was acceptable; this is where we knew our place, or rather were put in our place. The irony there is that even that idea was projected onto me. It was an over-exaggerated distortion of femininity (a perversion) as defined by someone else (not women, though they would buy into it). It wasn’t MY own sexuality or my natural appearance that would be valued, it was the gluttonously egoic patriarchal one, which included dictatorial control of everything from how a woman should look, to the noises she should make when she cums.
Pornography and objectification replaced authenticity – in one of the most organic, natural and intimate parts of our lives – and another perpetual battle would render many casualties in the war between the genders, ironically in an area where once a natural and pleasurable union (literally) was formed. Now people – adults, scramble to play in the game; where they have become the dehumanized pawns, the interchangeable game pieces, having lost any sense of what it means to be a man or a woman, lest a human being who values all the healthy aspects of both.
And this aspect of femininity – the sexual/beauty aspect, would also be the primary thing used against woman (even CEOs and senators, authors and activists) wherever all other progress was made – where the so-called reward is a backlash punishment of objectification, ridicule, diminishment, and lack of intimacy in personal relationships from male counterparts who are conditioned to be caught up in the image of a woman (to the point of addiction), more than the heart and mind of her.
Going back to the original article that spawned this writing, I agree that the opposite of manhood isn’t womanhood, it is boyhood – and that manhood and womanhood both require a maturity, a conscious growing up and showing up in our fullness….all those things Hugo mentions or implies – integrity, commitment, responsibility, etc. It’s not about doing it better or even different than the other gender, but doing it better than we previously did, or than those who came before us. Evolution is not about further distinguishing ourselves from one another because of some negative and harmful association we have with the other gender, it’s about outgrowing the conditioning that caused the association- the unnatural divide, and celebrating and embracing the healthy versions of both – in ourselves and one another.
—
What’s your take on what you just read? Comment below or write a response and submit to us your own point of view or reaction here at the red box, below, which links to our submissions portal.
◊♦◊
Get the best stories from The Good Men Project delivered straight to your inbox, here.
◊♦◊
Sign up for our Writing Prompts email to receive writing inspiration in your inbox twice per week.
—
Photo—Couple arguing from Shutterstock
@Kofybean: I like men with a feminine side. In fact I prefer them and find them much more attractive than “manly” men. Your stereotypes are in your head. Your response was full of insults, and not helpful or well thought out. It seemed venomous and passive aggressive, actually. @Jessica: Thanks for the article. It’s nice to read something that speaks about what I have experienced with female gender bashing, and how much it hurts. I’m all grown up now, and it still hurts. It’s not being passive aggressive to mention that something hurts you. It’s just stating a fact. Also… Read more »
Passive Aggressive. No coherence. Complete rhetoric. First of all, you really felt ashamed to have a vagina? Are you serious, what pity party are you appealing to? Who says that?? In such a generic way too. You didn’t say, “John Doe made me feel ashamed to have a vagina in his book on why vagina’s suck” You personalized an issue from an generic population. That is very passive aggressive. Who made you feel ashamed? Did I? I am man. I didn’t? Than who?? Who personally attacked you, because it is not possible for an entire gender to take the blame… Read more »
John D. You write like a male baboon who lost his brain on the way up the banana tree. I mean, really.. “Again, the strait-jacket placed upon men’s behavior is NOT a gender oppression of women. It is a point-blank dehumanization of men and nothing more. Additionally, it is something that women do not have to cope with.” Women do not have to cope with point blank dehumanization? What mutanto planet are you living on? Its one thing for you to acknowledge that men suffer too, but to not notice that women are dehumanized, is like not noticing when your… Read more »
It’s a good thing that male-bashing and devaluing men isn’t bad too, or we’d have no entertainment and advertising industries in America!
I agree, mainstream media is extremely disparaging of men! The same people/industries who are disparaging men are disparaging women. And they spin it as if all men are buying into that image or somehow benefit from it. Which we know is not true. We need to take an honest look at not only who is writing, producing and funding the media, but who is consuming it. Viewers equal ratings, equals money. We need to hold the media accountable, demand better programming and cease consuming what doesn’t serve us. We need different voices/representation – it’s long overdue.
While women might be depicted as individual body parts, men are depicted as targets of violence by both men and women right up to and including rape. The level of violence depicted against men in movies and commercials would never be tolerated if depicted against women. In the movie road trip a woman beats a man with an aluminum baseball bat because she suspects him of cheating. The funny part? It’s a case of mistaken identity and he wasn’t cheating after all. Isn’t that funny? Do you think any movie would ever get made which contained a scene in which… Read more »
I cannot say this adamantly enough. The strait-jacket of acceptable behavior for men is NOT gender oppression of women. This would be like me saying that slut-shaming of men is gender oppression of me. Women are allowed to be as masculine as they want with very mild (comparatively) negative consequence. Why? It’s not because masculinity is lifted above femininity. It is because even when a woman acts masculine, she still has value as a woman (her womb, and sexuality). Men do not inherently have value the way women do for their bodies. A woman always has womanhood no matter how… Read more »
2nd sentence should have said:
This would be like me saying that slut-shaming of women is gender oppression of men.
You say: “Women are allowed to be as masculine as they want with very mild (comparatively) negative consequence.” That is my point…we can be masculine with little consequence because it’s accepted, the consequence/backlash comes when we are authentically female/feminine. I don’t think you got that part of my article. That we’re all expected to be one way, and it’s not ‘feminine,’ or those traits considered to be feminine. Where is this place you speak of where women’s bodies, wombs, sexuality and reproductive abilities are valued? If you think women’s bodies are valued, I’m afraid we live in very different realities.… Read more »
Jessica. I wish you were as well versed in the harm of male gender roles on men as you seem to be for women. The simple fact is that despite what you say about finances, men account for 90% of the destitute chronic homeless, many of whom are nameless and don’t get logged into census takers household income reports. Meanwhile, women and children make up some 90% of those in transitional housing. In other words, what you say may be factually true, but the social safety net is obviously reserved for women and/or women and children. Men are 80% the… Read more »
In other words those who are male bodied are not valued for their bodies. Men are only valued when they prove that they are adept at self-sacrifice for others and being utilized.
Excellent post and very moving. I think the shame of one’s own femininity and trying to ‘rise’ to the level of masculinity is something that every girl and woman can relate to.
Thank you!