
She didn’t see it the first time.
The first time, she thought it was her. Something she’d said, something she’d done, something about the way she loved that was too much or not enough or wrong in a way she couldn’t identify. By the time she recognized the pattern, she was already in the second one. And by the time she understood the stages, she was trying to figure out whether what she was experiencing was the beginning of something or the ending of it.
The dismissive avoidant doesn’t run the same play in every relationship. They run it in every stage of the same relationship, with the same person, in a sequence so consistent that once you’ve seen it, you can’t unsee it.
Stage One: The Opening
The first stage of a relationship with a dismissive avoidant tends to feel surprisingly good. This is the part that confuses people most when things change, because the opening doesn’t look like avoidance. It looks like interest, like warmth, like someone who has chosen to let you in.
What’s happening in this stage is real. The dismissive avoidant nervous system isn’t performing interest; it doesn’t feel. The connection is genuine. What makes it possible is that the level of closeness in Stage One is still below the threshold that activates the threat response. There’s interest without full exposure. There’s warmth without the specific vulnerability that comes from a relationship that has become real enough to lose.
The dismissive avoidant in Stage One can be attentive, curious, engaged. They may pursue actively. They may be the one who initiates, who creates the conditions for closeness, who makes it clear that this person matters to them. And they mean it, in that moment, in that stage, at that level of closeness.
What the other person is experiencing is also real: the pull of someone choosing you, the specific warmth of feeling seen by someone who doesn’t seem to need much. There’s an ease to Stage One because the dismissive avoidant isn’t yet managing the full weight of what the connection is becoming. They haven’t yet had to.
Stage Two: The Shift
The shift tends to arrive without a visible trigger.
Something in the relationship deepens, not necessarily through a dramatic event, but through accumulation. Enough shared experience for the connection to feel significant. Enough closeness for the nervous system to register what’s at stake. And with that registration, the deactivation begins.
The dismissive avoidant doesn’t decide to pull back. The nervous system implements distance automatically, below the level of conscious decision, when the level of closeness exceeds what it can currently hold without threat response firing. The warmth that was present in Stage One doesn’t disappear because the feelings changed. It becomes less accessible because the deactivation system is now running.
From the outside, this looks like sudden withdrawal. The person on the receiving end of it tends to do what the attachment system was built to do: reach. Try to close the distance. Try to recover whatever was present before the shift. The problem is that reaching increases the demand on the dismissive avoidant’s nervous system, and the nervous system is already in protection mode. The reaching doesn’t restore Stage One. It tends to deepen Stage Two.
This is the stage that produces the most confusion, because the evidence of Stage One is still visible. The warmth happened. The interest was real. So the person reaching isn’t crazy to believe the connection is still there; it is still there. They just can’t access it right now, because the person they’re reaching for is running a protection strategy that was built long before this relationship existed.
What tends to happen in Stage Two is a specific exhausting loop: distance, reaching, more distance, explanation, temporary return of warmth, hope, distance again. The loop doesn’t resolve through more effort, more communication, or more patience alone. It resolves, if it resolves, through the dismissive avoidant’s nervous system accumulating enough evidence that this level of closeness doesn’t produce the cost it was built to expect.
That accumulation takes time. More time than the person in the loop usually has.
Stage Three: The Resolution
Stage Three isn’t always an ending. Sometimes it’s a stabilisation, the nervous system finding a new equilibrium where the closeness is real but the deactivation has quieted enough to allow consistent warmth. This happens in relationships where the other person has learned not to amplify the reaching when Stage Two activates, and where the dismissive avoidant has accumulated enough safe experience to start updating the model they’ve been running.
But often, Stage Three is an ending. The distance of Stage Two has lasted long enough that the person on the other side has run out of the specific resource that Stage Two depletes most efficiently: hope. Not love; they may still love this person. But the sustained uncertainty, the loop, the pattern of warmth and withdrawal without resolution, eventually costs more than the connection is giving back.
What makes Stage Three painful regardless of how it resolves is that it often arrives with new clarity about what Stage One actually was. Not a performance, the warmth was real. But a stage. A level of closeness that the dismissive avoidant’s nervous system could sustain before the relationship became significant enough to threaten. Stage One was the relationship before it was real enough to cost anything. Stage Two was what happened when it was.
Understanding this doesn’t resolve the grief of Stage Three. But it changes what the grief is about. It isn’t about being deceived by someone who faked interest they didn’t feel. It’s about a nervous system that was genuinely capable of the warmth in Stage One and genuinely unable to sustain it once the connection crossed its threshold. Both things were true. They just couldn’t coexist at the same level of closeness.
If this pattern is something you’re living inside, or trying to understand after the fact, this is where that understanding can deepen: Know your Attachment
—
This post was previously published on medium.com.
Love relationships? We promise to have a good one with your inbox.
Subcribe to get 3x weekly dating and relationship advice.
Did you know? We have 8 publications on Medium. Join us there!
***
–
Photo credit: Dollar Gill On Unsplash