
About three months after I left, Hanna took me to a bookshop.
Not for any reason. Just to walk around. Just to be somewhere quiet and warm that smelled like paper and had nothing to do with him.
She picked up a novel and passed it to me. An author I’d never heard of. She said she thought I’d like it based on the things I used to read.
I stood there holding the book and realised I had no idea if she was right.
I couldn’t remember what I used to read. I couldn’t remember what I liked — not just in books, but in general. What I ordered at restaurants before I started ordering what he approved of. What music I played in the car before his taste became the default. What I thought about things before I learned to run my opinions through the filter of how he might receive them.
I had come out of that relationship and found that large portions of myself were simply missing.
Not damaged. Not broken. Missing. Like furniture removed from a room while you weren’t looking until one day you sit down and there’s nothing there.
I had come out of that relationship and found that large portions of myself were simply missing. Not damaged. Not broken. Missing.
I thought this was grief. I thought it was the normal aftermath of losing someone, even someone who hurt you. I thought it would pass.
It took me a long time — and a therapist who asked exactly the right questions — to understand what had actually happened.
He hadn’t just taken things from me. He had copied me. Systematically. From the very beginning. And then, once he had enough of me inside him, he had used it to hollow me out from the inside.
The beginning felt like magic. It was data collection.
In the early months he was extraordinary at understanding me.
Not in the slow, imperfect way that real intimacy builds — where someone gets you mostly right and occasionally wrong and you forgive the gaps because the effort is genuine. He understood me completely. Immediately. In a way that felt fated.
He loved the same obscure things I loved. He held the same opinions. He laughed at the same moments. He finished my sentences not because he was guessing but because he seemed to already know.
I thought I had found the person who was built to understand me.
What I had actually found was someone who was extraordinarily skilled at becoming whoever the person in front of him needed him to be.
He wasn’t discovering that he loved the same things I loved. He was cataloguing what I loved and feeding it back to me. Every conversation in those early months was an intake session. Every vulnerability I shared was filed. Every preference, every wound, every value I held — noted, absorbed, reflected.
The love felt cosmic because he was showing me myself. And we are all, at some level, most drawn to the person who makes us feel most seen.
He knew that. He used it with precision.
The love felt cosmic because he was showing me myself. And we are all, at some level, most drawn to the person who makes us feel most seen.
Phase two: the copy becomes a weapon.
Here is where it gets sophisticated. And here is where most people — including me, for a very long time — miss what is actually happening.
Once he had enough of me, he started giving it back wrong.
The values I held — he’d claim them too, then violate them in ways that made me feel I was being unreasonable for noticing. The opinions I’d shared — he’d adopt them, then use them to shut down my objections. But you always said you believed in giving people the benefit of the doubt, Gisela. Isn’t that what you’re not doing right now?
My own words. In his mouth. Pointed back at me.
The things I was most proud of — my empathy, my patience, my commitment to fairness — became the specific tools he used to keep me from trusting my own instincts. Because I had told him, early on, that those were the things I valued most in myself. And he had filed that information carefully.
He weaponised my self-concept. He took the version of myself I most wanted to be and used it as a cage.
An empathetic person would understand why I did that.
A fair person would hear my side before reacting.
You always said you weren’t like other women who overreact. So why are you doing this?
I spent two years trying to live up to a version of myself he had constructed from the parts of me I’d trusted him with.
He weaponised my self-concept. He took the version of myself I most wanted to be and used it as a cage.
While he was expanding, I was disappearing.
This is the part nobody talks about and the part I find hardest to explain even now.
It wasn’t that he told me to stop being myself. He never said that. There was no single moment of erasure I can point to.
It happened through accumulation. Through the slow gravitational pull of living alongside someone who had no self of his own and therefore needed to consume yours.
My opinions started to feel less certain. Not because he argued with them — he rarely did that directly. But because living with someone who reflects everything back at you slightly wrong, slightly distorted, slightly adjusted to serve his purposes, eventually makes you doubt the original.
I stopped trusting my own taste. My own reactions. My own memory of who I was before him.
By the time I left I had been living in his version of me for so long that I couldn’t find the original underneath it.
That day in the bookshop, holding the novel Hanna had chosen, I wasn’t grieving him.
I was grieving me.
I wasn’t grieving him. I was grieving me.
The embarrassing admission.
I was good at knowing myself before him.
Unusually good, actually. Friends used to come to me when they needed someone to help them think through who they were and what they wanted. I had opinions about things. Preferences. A clear sense of what I valued and why.
I thought that made me safe from this kind of loss. I thought you had to be uncertain about yourself to be taken over. I thought a strong sense of identity was protection.
It wasn’t. If anything it was the opposite.
A strong, clear, articulately expressed sense of self is an extraordinarily useful thing to someone who needs raw material. I handed him everything he needed in the first three months. Laid it out clearly. Explained myself thoroughly. Trusted him with the precise architecture of who I was.
I thought I was being intimate. I was being inventoried.
I thought I was being intimate. I was being inventoried.
How you find yourself again.
Not quickly. I want to say that first because every article about recovery makes it sound like a process with stages and a finish line and I want to tell you the truth which is that it is more like archaeology than renovation.
You dig. Carefully. In the rubble of the person you were before he got there. You find things you’d forgotten were yours. A preference for a certain kind of silence. An opinion you’d stopped voicing. A reaction you’d learned to suppress because it made him uncomfortable.
You hold each piece up to the light and ask: is this mine? Or is this his version of me?
Sometimes you can’t tell immediately. That’s fine. You keep the ones that feel true and set down the ones that don’t and you do it again tomorrow.
I went back to that bookshop six weeks later. Alone. I stood in front of the shelves for a long time and I waited to feel something pull me toward something.
Eventually it did.
I bought the book. I read it in two days. It was exactly what I would have chosen before him.
She was still in there. Underneath everything he’d laid on top of her.
She had just been waiting for the weight to lift.
—
This post was previously published on medium.com.
Love relationships? We promise to have a good one with your inbox.
Subcribe to get 3x weekly dating and relationship advice.
Did you know? We have 8 publications on Medium. Join us there!
***
–
Photo credit: Mike Newbry on Unsplash