A Storm Lasts Minutes, the Consequences Can Last Much Longer: When Wind Becomes an Operational Risk

In my previous articles, I looked at extreme rainfall and how climate change is changing the risk landscape for industrial operations. But heavy rainfall rarely comes alone. Increasingly, these events are accompanied by short, intense storms with extreme wind gusts.

Just a few days ago, the small town where I live was hit by such a storm. It lasted approximately 15 minutes. The result was significant damage: numerous trees were literally cut down by wind gusts of around 200 km/h close to ground level. A large festival tent was lifted by the wind and thrown into nearby trees.

A festival tent—not a small pavilion.

Events like this are a reminder that extreme wind is not only a problem for public events or private property. Industrial sites are equally exposed. The difference is that, in a business environment, the consequences can quickly become operational, financial, and even reputational.

Because wind damage is rarely just about the wind itself. The real question is: what does the wind find on its way?

The Hidden Risk: Everything We Leave Exposed

Unlike heavy rainfall, which mainly challenges the ability of a site to keep water out, wind creates a different type of vulnerability. It turns objects, structures, and materials into potential hazards.

A metal component that becomes detached from a roof. A roof hatch that is lifted and damaged by a gust. A loose construction element that becomes airborne. A tree or branch falling onto critical infrastructure.

The initial weakness may appear insignificant. But once wind transforms a loose object into a moving object, the damage potential changes completely. This is where many industrial sites have underestimated exposure.

In many facilities, the outdoor area has gradually become an unofficial extension of the warehouse. Materials are stored outside because internal space is limited. Containers wait longer for collection. Equipment, packaging materials, spare parts, or waste accumulate because the arrangement is considered temporary. But temporary solutions often become permanent risks.

Stacks of empty IBC containers are a good example. Operationally, storing them outside may seem practical. But when they are stacked several meters high and exposed to extreme wind, they are no longer simply inventory. They become a potential source of secondary damage.

The same applies to temporary storage tents or lightweight structures. They may have solved a capacity problem when expanding the facility was too expensive or impossible due to permits. But every temporary structure introduces a question that needs to be answered: Is this solution still appropriate for the conditions we are facing today?

Resilience Starts With Understanding Exposure

As with extreme rainfall, the first step is not investment. It is awareness. Before discussing major protective measures, companies need to understand their actual exposure.

Do we really need everything that is currently stored outside? Could waste collection cycles be shortened? Could IBC containers or other materials be removed more frequently instead of accumulating? Are there areas of the site where unsecured materials could become a hazard during extreme wind?

These questions sound simple. But they reveal an important principle: resilience often starts with operational discipline rather than expensive technology.

The same applies to the surrounding environment. Trees are valuable assets. They provide shade, improve the working environment, and contribute positively to industrial sites. But unmanaged vegetation can also become a risk during severe storms.

A mature tree close to a production building, parking area, or critical infrastructure requires the same attention as any other physical asset. Are there dead branches? Are trees exposed to direct wind loads because they stand in open areas? Could surrounding vegetation help reduce wind impact before gusts reach the trunk?

The question is not whether trees belong on industrial sites. The question is whether the site is managed with a realistic understanding of changing weather patterns.

The Importance of Ownership

Many storm-related incidents are not caused by a lack of technical knowledge. They happen because responsibilities are unclear.

Who closes windows and roof openings at the end of the day?
Who checks temporary structures and outdoor storage areas?
Who monitors weather warnings and decides when preventive action is required?

These may appear like operational details. But they determine whether an organization reacts before an event—or after damage has already occurred.

This is where leadership attention matters. Climate-related operational risks cannot be managed effectively if they exist only in the minds of individual employees or maintenance teams. They need clear ownership, regular review, and integration into operational risk management.

A supervisory board or executive team does not need to decide how every container is stored or which tree needs pruning. But it should be confident that the organization understands its vulnerabilities and has mechanisms in place to address them.

Do We Know What Our Assets Can Withstand?

Temporary structures, roofs, and external equipment often remain in service for years without anyone revisiting the original assumptions behind them. A storage tent may have been installed five years ago. A roof may still be functional after decades. External equipment may have always been stored in the same location.

But the relevant question is not whether something worked in the past. The relevant question is whether it is still suitable for the conditions we are increasingly facing.

When was the roof last inspected?
Are there loose components that could give wind an entry point?
What wind speeds is the temporary structure designed for?
How often are these conditions exceeded in our region?
Are we still managing yesterday’s risk—or today’s reality?

From Damage Response to Operational Resilience

Climate change is not only increasing temperatures. It is changing the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events. For companies, this means resilience cannot remain a topic that appears only after an incident. It needs to become part of how organizations think about operational continuity.

Extreme wind events are a useful example because they expose something fundamental: the difference between a company that has assets and a company that understands its vulnerabilities. The organizations that perform best will not necessarily be those that eliminate every risk. That is impossible.

They will be those that know where they are exposed, prioritize what matters most, and act before a disruption occurs. Because the storm itself may last only 15 minutes. The consequences can last much longer.

—

This post was previously published on Notes from the Anthropocene.

***