[Get your free subscription to the International Association of Creative and Performing Artists newsletter here.]
So, they invited Miriam, a painter known less for her sales than for her uncanny timing. She had a way of making work that seemed, retrospectively, inevitable—as if she had seen what was coming before anyone else had language for it.
The invitation came from the Office of Civic Engagement, a small department with an ambitious name. “We’re not asking for a mural,” the director clarified in their first meeting. “We’re asking for… insight. For perspective.”
Miriam smiled at that. Artists were always being asked for perspective, usually as a decorative afterthought. A panel here, a talk there, a commissioned piece to hang in a lobby already designed without them. But this felt different. There was a tremor of sincerity in the room.
“What do you want me to do?” she asked.
The director hesitated. “We want you to tell us where we are.”
Miriam began, as she always did, by walking.
She walked the length of the river that no one looked at anymore. She walked through the downtown where half the storefronts had been replaced by polished sameness. She walked the neighborhoods that did not appear in brochures. She carried a small notebook but rarely wrote in it. Instead, she let images accumulate: a child drawing in chalk on a cracked sidewalk; a man arguing into his phone outside a closed library; a row of identical cafes with different names and identical interiors.
She noticed color first. The city had become strangely monochrome. Not literally—there were still bright signs and seasonal banners—but emotionally. The palette had narrowed. There was less risk in the visual field, fewer surprises. Even the graffiti, once raw and inventive, had become stylized, almost polite.
Then she noticed sound. Conversations felt clipped, transactional. Laughter came in short bursts, as if rationed. Music leaked from headphones but rarely filled public space. It was a city that had retreated into itself.
She thought of a compass, not as a tool of navigation but as a symbol of orientation. A compass doesn’t tell you where to go. It tells you where north is. The rest is up to you.
What, she wondered, was north for this city now?
In her studio, Miriam began a series of paintings she did not yet explain to anyone. The first was almost entirely gray, but not a dead gray. It shimmered with subtle variations—cool, warm, metallic, matte. Embedded within it were faint outlines of familiar places: the riverbank, the library steps, the market square. They were barely visible, as if receding.
The second painting introduced color, but only in fragments. A vivid red line cut across the canvas, then disappeared. A patch of electric blue hovered in one corner. The forms did not cohere. It was a painting of interruption.
The third was different. It was messy, almost chaotic. Thick strokes of color collided and overlapped. There were recognizable figures now—people reaching, turning, gesturing—but they were not fully formed. The painting felt like a conversation that had not yet found its grammar.
She worked quickly, then slowly, then not at all. She sat with the paintings, waiting for them to speak back. When she finally returned to the Office of Civic Engagement, she did not bring a report. She brought the paintings. They set them up in a conference room usually reserved for budget meetings. The director and a handful of staff stood awkwardly at first, unsure how to behave.
“This is where we are,” Miriam said, gesturing to the first painting. “A kind of aesthetic and emotional narrowing. Things are still here, but they’re fading from shared attention.”
She moved to the second. “This is what it feels like to try to break out of that. Moments of intensity, but they don’t connect. They don’t become a language.”
And then the third. “This is possibility. It’s not comfortable. It’s not resolved. But it’s alive.”
The room was quiet.
One of the staff members, a young man who had been taking notes, spoke up. “So, what do we do?”
Miriam shook her head gently. “I’m not here to tell you what to do. I’m here to show you what I’m seeing. To orient you.”
“But isn’t that the same thing?” he asked.
“No,” she said. “If I tell you what to do, you might follow it without understanding. If you see where you are, you can choose your own direction.”
The city decided, rather to Miriam’s surprise, to take her seriously.
Not in the grand, sweeping way that makes headlines, but in smaller, more tentative gestures. They opened up public spaces for unscripted performances. They funded projects that had no immediate measurable outcome. They invited artists—not just Miriam, but many others—into conversations that had previously excluded them.
At first, nothing much seemed to change. Attendance at events remained uneven. Some projects failed outright. Critics called it a waste of resources. But then, slowly, something shifted. Music began to reappear in public spaces, not as background noise but as shared experience. Murals emerged that did not match the city’s branding guidelines but somehow felt more honest. People lingered longer in places they used to pass through.
The river, one weekend, filled again with families and friends. No one could point to a single cause. There was no policy document that explained it. Miriam kept walking. She noticed that the palette of the city was changing. Not dramatically, but perceptibly. There were new colors, new textures. Conversations stretched a little longer. Laughter lingered.
She began a new series of paintings, though she did not rush to show them.
Months later, the director asked her to return.
“Where are we now?” she asked.
Miriam considered the question.
“We’re in motion,” she said. “Which is different from being lost, but it can feel similar.” She paused, then added, “The important thing is that you’re paying attention again. A compass only matters if you’re willing to look at it.”
The director nodded. “And you? What is your role in all this?”
Miriam smiled, a little tired, a little amused. “I don’t set the direction,” she said. “I notice the drift.”
In the years that followed, the city would face new challenges. Economic shifts, political tensions, environmental pressures. There would be moments when the horizon seemed to tilt again. Each time, someone would suggest bringing in artists—not as decorators, not as entertainers, but as cultural instruments attuned to subtle changes in meaning, mood, and possibility.
They had learned, in a way that statistics and reports could not teach, that artists function as a kind of compass. Not infallible. Not singular. But necessary. They help a culture feel where it is before it knows how to say it. And in that quiet, often overlooked act of orientation, they offer something both modest and profound: the chance to choose a direction with eyes open.
Eric Maisel, President
International Association of Creative and Performing Artists
Our fundamental belief is that creativity knows no bounds. While we enthusiastically embrace performers like musicians, actors, and dancers, we are equally dedicated to all writers, visual artists, and every creative spirit. Our community extends to anyone who imagines and creates in any domain, from architecture to physics, and from education to business.
—
iStock image
