
Don’t let Lil Wayne fool you.
One racist act against a certain group is no different than any other racist act against any other certain group. Racism in the US was overlooked and swept under the rug because it didn’t affect you, white people. You had one large historical racist act against you and you never looked back. Don’t get me wrong. I applaud you for your determination and will to rise above. But it seems as if you were comfortable a bit too much. Unfortunately racism still exists and racists still commit racist acts against those who they feel superior over. Sometimes, the racism isn’t even behind a superiority complex. It’s inferiority. How ironic?
How ironic is it that a person who bleeds the same way you do, finds it necessary that because of their skin they are more privileged than you, gets to mistreat and degrade you because you have what they don’t. It then becomes a case of jealousy and envy.
For centuries, the white man has been envious and jealous of the black man. The white man has had and always will have one power and ability in him. The ability to conquer. The white man is the epitome of a conqueror. Look at Napoleon. Look at Caesar. Look at Bush. Look at Trump. Just take a look back at any and every slave owner. Whether he enslaved blacks, Asians or Native Americans. He did it out of the desire to conquer. To be dominant where he could not rise.
Europeans kidnapped Africans with the intention of making them do the work for them that they themselves couldn’t quite accomplish. And to this day, white owners stack their sports teams with a lot of blacks because they want to win.
And they feel the only way they can win is with the help of the black man. But you’ll never hear it expressed like this.
This is the true secret to society. Not a secret society itself. But a secret that says that black men have the power and strength that needs to be harnessed for the purpose of white uplifting.
Africans were kidnapped and sold into slavery because the white man didn’t have the intelligence, strength, or fortitude to work their own lands, raise their own children or even cook their own meals. And they call us blacks, lazy?
Dear white people. Racism has always been here. It’s just that you were on the upper end of the stick when it was being shoved down oppressed throats.
Now, with the current wave of racist acts on the rise against, you, white people, you are now forced to see the world the way a black person has been seeing it for far too long.
You claim to be unsure and afraid of what lies ahead while we seem to be a little more relaxed than you. Not because we don’t care. But because we’ve been here, we’ve done this. We have survived recessions and depressions all our lives. That’s where we conquer. We don’t go out with the desire to conquer other people and cultures. We go out and strive to conquer the beast within. The power of the self that you love to hate. We desire to conquer the ills of the world that we face, in the disguises of systems and politics.
Every day is a struggle for a black man. Every day, we must face our adversaries. Even if, every day we must work alongside our oppressors. You may think you are not part of the oppression. But any time you have privileges unearned and just granted to you because of your skin color or heritage, you are silently taking away from those who may be more deserving than you. Therefore, making you a part of the problem. Or simply, the problem itself.
There are way too many minorities that don’t get the chances they deserve because, well, they are a minority. Unfair, uncool. And a bit racist. Now the racism has been mixed and diluted with so many other prejudices. It’s hard to tell one from the other. It’s also easy to claim you’re not being racist because it’s such a thin line.
How can we tell the difference? Well, I tend to look at it like this. Prejudice is the act of prejudging. We all do it. But when we prejudge and ultimately have the intent to make a decision for or against that person, based on that prejudgement, that blocks that person’s blessing. That’s when you enter the danger zone. If your desire is to keep a person down, you’re being prejudiced.
If your desire is to keep a person down because of how they look or who they are. You might be a racist. Just saying…
I believe it all starts at home. Teach your kids accountability. Kids who never have any accountability for their ways and actions wander aimlessly through life thinking they’re never wrong, nothing is their fault and everything is owed to them. Then they develop these complexes that they are better than those who are different. Then they meet the neighborhood racist who shares some of the same complexes and introduces the kid to racism. It’s a very thin line. Tread lightly.
__
Photo credit: Getty Images


Erm… isn’t asserting that Race A doesn’t have the “intelligence, strength, fortitude…” of Race B (and so enslaves them to make use of those traits) the definition of racism?
You can be angry, hurt, dismayed – whatever you need to express. You have real grievances that shouldn’t be ignored. But don’t
buy into the same mindset that got us here. That road doesn’t lead anywhere good.
Racism is one of the tentacles of patriarchy, a divisive devaluing model of inter-relating. The human race did not start out under patriarchy.
If anyone studied slavery just in the slightest they would know that only Western Imperialists created a CLOSED system of slavery, a slavery so closed that it passed on down to one’s generations, because it was anchored in physiology of a person. As long as that physical aspect is visible then slavery and its originator, racism, continue to target the person. All other slaveries were OPEN. For example, African slaves were slaves till mid afternoon, after which they tilled their own land.Often these hardworking slaves had their own slaves working under them. If Africans did make slaves of whites, it… Read more »
It wasn’t just Europeans who made slaves of Africans. Africans made slaves of Europeans as well.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/british/empire_seapower/white_slaves_01.shtml
If you studied slavery just in the slightest you would know that only Western Imperialists created a CLOSED system of slavery, a slavery so closed that it passed on down to one’s generations, because it was anchored in physiology of a person. As long as that physical aspect is visible then slavery and its originator, racism, continue to target the person. All other slaveries were OPEN. For example, African slaves were slaves till mid afternoon, after which they tilled their own land.Often these hardworking slaves had their own slaves working under them. If Africans did make slaves of whites, it… Read more »
Yet, antebellum slavery wasn’t quite “closed” either since slaves were able to purchase their freedom, which indicated that they were able at some point to perform work for their own benefit.
http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/maai/emancipation/text1/text1read.htm
Are you going to consider consessions made to abolitionists as an ‘opening up’ of slavery?
Would not crediting it make it more closed than the Israeli bondage in Egypt, which if you look at the bible seemed a “closed” system based on your definition. Crediting it would seem to make it more open.
Some African tribes participated in the trans Atlantic slave trade. I’m not as familiar with whether their slavery was “open” or “closed”, but since Egypt spans north Africa, I would suspect that their “type” of slavery would be closer to the Egyptian than Greek type.
I am sad to say that I do not understand your comment. “Crediting’ makes no sense to me. If you want to talk about slavery for white people by white people, like indentured servitude (is that your bondage?) you are stepping into the wider discussion of the abuse that patriarchy perpetrates on its members, while stepping away from the discussion of racism. If you are sincerely interested please read on the topic. https://www.amazon.co.uk/African-Slaves-Masters-Politics-Memories/dp/156902443X/ref=sr_1_4?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1481888217&sr=1-4&keywords=Bellagamba
My point about slavery was that everyone did it at one time, but truth be told, white people were the first to stop (to my knowledge. I believe Britain made it illegal about 75 years before the U.S.) and the first to make it illegal thus stopping others. My point is that white people are “being singled out” because their ancestors won, but truth be told, the Africans would have gladly enslaved the Eyropeans if given the chance. My point is going back and trying to apportion blame or trying to make white perpetrated slavery out as something worse than… Read more »
Dear ‘white’ man. Is in itself a divisive and racist label. Dear ‘black’ man is a racist label. As long as you only see a color and look for superior or inferior motives then you sir are as much a racist as any you judge. The last time I checked you were part of the human race, not a color race or inferior race but you show your inferiority by holding anyone hostage to a past that was before your time and experiences in your life that were about learning to evolve, not fight to prove your superiority or inferiority.… Read more »
In my view, racism is an unintended consequence of the highly social nature of humans – meaning it has a biological cognitive link. Social animals need to establish a belief system that is shared in order to build community, cooperate and thrive. This creates the unintended in/out dynamic of groups – those folks over there have different beliefs, look different, eat different, pray different etc etc – it is my belief that this is indeed the root of racism.
So, are you saying that humans are born racists? Mandela disagrees with you, and so do many other people and professionals. Instead, my consideration is that racism exists, where ‘race’ does not, and is a tentacle of patriachy rendered lethal by imperialist colonisation of territories and the domination of the inhabitants. You couch your fatalism in pseudoscientific premises (” ..a belief system that is shared in order to build community, cooperate and thrive.” feigning that the denigrated individuals are not part of the community) Your ‘belief’ about the root of racism needs some updating if you can handle the implication… Read more »
I don’t think you know of what you speak of – sorry to be so blunt.
Dear Elissa, is your comment the effect of projection? I repeat my question: Are you saying that humans are born racist? As for my credentials, I work in the field dealing with diversity, cognitive sciences, mental health,violence, politics and philosophy. My learning and experience leads me to a conclusion opposite to yours. Maybe you would be inclined to tell us about the experiences or material which have led you to your beliefs?
I’m surprised that with your credentials you would ask me such a question. I said my belief is that there is a cognitive evolutionary link to racism and that it may be an unintended offshoot of human sociability – and you replied by asking if I believe humans are born racist? Is that what you got out of that?
And what on earth are you going on about with the “there was no racism before patriarchy”. Marija Gimbutas died long ago and so did her ideas.
And don’t “Dear me” please. I’m trying my best to be nice.
As Socrates’ ideas remain with us, so do Gimbutas’; I am sorry that you feel it necessary to eliminate her work from your mind. Who/ what inspired that gesture? Staying on topic: “a cognitive evolutionary link ” ? Is that another way of saying part of our DNA? Is that your version of saying human brains are hard-wired for racism? I am not grasping the concept of links that are cognitive and evolutionary. Could you clarify this idea of yours a bit more? Thank you for making the effort “to be nice”.
If you’re this funny when you’re not trying to be funny I bet your comedy is awesome. Basically your logic states that whites don’t think they can win without blacks so they conquer blacks so then they can win… The cogniitive dissonance you have going there is really impressive. Why do you purposefully ignore the “accomplishments” of non-white conquerors? Genghis Khan wants to know why HE isn’t listed as a great conqueror when he managed to rule an empire spanning 2 continents and killed 10% of the world’s population. Tamerlane and Atilla are kind of put out by their omissions… Read more »
I feel you’ve given too much credit to Khan, when the success of the Mongolian army was more a function of the Mongol ponies – they were small and very fast, overwhelming most other armies by the sheer speed of their advance. The pony is the chief cause of Mongolian dominance. People forget about the pony. Khan was a poseur. Credit to the ponies!
Well ponies or no; Genghis and his progeny conquered and killed so many people (even white males!) to repudiate any of the revisionist crap history spewed in articles like this.
10% of the world’s population is a number that no one can ignore-.
Guys – it was tongue in cheek…horsing around. Khan’s greatest skill was most likely his ability to unify and squash tribalism among the Mongol population. But don’t forget the ponies.
While it’s true he had horses, that fact only allowed him to take over and kill that much faster. Ya gotta love technological innovation! . The point is he was, shall we say, a person of color conqueror. And a really really good one at that.