There was a time, years ago, when I used to start many responses with those three words.
āMen commit rape.ā: āNot all men.ā
āMen are violent.ā: āNot all men.ā
āMen hide their feelings.ā: āNot all men.ā
This is a defensive response that refocuses the discussion. Itās also highly patronizing: Few people who say, for instance, āMen are trashā really mean āEvery person who identifies as a man is trash.ā They mean āMany men are trashā or āMost of the men Iāve dealt with in my life are trashā or even just āMy boyfriend is really getting on my nerves right now.ā
We could choose to listen to the personās complaints and process how theyāre feeling, which is the route of compassion and empathy. Or we could decide that theyāre making a blanket generalization, and rush to the defense of all the men to whom the generalization applies.
Thus making it about us and our feelings, instead of the very real feelings that led to someone expressing frustration or disappointment.
By the way, if youāre a man and youāre talking to someone who truly believes that every person who identifies as a man is trash, youāre not going to get far in the conversation. Walk away. Donāt embarrass yourself by engaging in a pointless argument.
And of course, I wasnāt really defending all men. I wasnāt even seriously defending other men who, like me, werenāt engaging in whatever behavior was being criticized. I was defending me and me alone. It was all about how my feelings had been hurt at the prospect of being seen as āthat sort of man.ā
One of my anthems at the time was Rollins Bandās āWrong Manā: āIām not all men, Iām just one man, Iām not that man!ā
āā¦ā
At some point, I came to realize that a serious response of ānot all menā was annoying and counterproductive. Women did not rush to my side of the argument, realizing how theyād hurt my feelings with the blanket generalization.

I started using āNot all menā ironically. So people could make sure that people knew I was joking, I would insert a smile emoji after it, or put it in scare quotes. See, ladies? I know itās not a valid thing to say!
I know itās what an annoying man would say right now to make it about him!
Iām not really saying it, so you can all see that⦠Iām⦠not⦠um.
I was making it about me again. On one level, I was being even worse. I was engaging in a microaggression. I was saying, in effect, āI could make this about me, I could be one of those fragile men that needs conversations to be all about him, but⦠Iām not going to. Iām just going to remind you that I could. I choose not to, but now I need your validation or maybe Iāll go back to my old ways.ā
Sadly, I didnāt realize this by myself. It took someone else staring me down and telling me they werenāt going to tolerate it. Tolerate what? Iām joking! See the smiley! Hahaha!
I apologized. I stopped making the comment, even ironically. I havenāt made it since.
āā¦ā
To be clear, thereās nothing wrong with starting a sentence with ānot all menā or its cousin ānot all whites.ā Last week, after all, I wrote an article called āNot All Masculinity is Toxic.ā
The main problem comes from using it as a response. All lives matter, sure, but if the only time you feel like pointing that out is when someone says, āBlack lives matter,ā then youāre missing the point. Likewise, if the only time you feel like distinguishing yourself from misogynists is when someone suggests you are one, thatās a problem.
So now, when someone complains about men, I donāt even feel the need to defend myself. By freeing myself from ānot all men,ā Iāve given myself room to truly listen to whatās being said. I can express proper sympathy. I can keep the focus on the person having a problem, instead of pulling the spotlight onto me.
On the flipside, I also feel like men should be careful with casually saying things like “Men suck” or “Men are trash.” For one thing, some of us men, including myself, have a history of cookie-seeking behavior, where we deliberately distance ourselves from “our kind” in order to curry favor with others. For another, I used to toss such comments (or “white people” equivalents) fairly freely, but it started to feel fatalistic: If men are trash, if white people suck, do I really have a chance of rising above the stereotype? Did I really need to punch myself in order to prove something?
Now I include qualifiers: Some men do this. Men have certain unfortunate expectations. Toxic attitudes about masculinity encourage men to do these things.
So letās talk about what men can be. Letās be better men. Letās take other men to task for their misogyny, their casual violence, their emotional distanceā¦. Not all men are like that, which is good. Instead of trying to convince women that we “not those men” exist, letās try to convince other men that we exist, and that they can be like us, too.
—

—
Photo credit: Getty Images

You make some good points, but I won’t stand for inaccurate language, which which the western civilization has cultivated: absolutism. It’s black and white language, which leaves huge margins of truth lumped in which falsehoods. Language means something and shouldn’t be taken so lightly. “Incompetent men”, “irresponsible men”, “dishonest men” would be closer to the truth. Accuracy in language brings focus to characteristics rather than broadens it. It doesn’t take big words, but will take more words instead of lazy language use. And that’s why its probably corrected as “not all men”, it’s incorrect especially once the demographics are looked… Read more »
I understand where you are coming from. Sometimes it is best just to listen and not respond but understand. However, there is a chorus that is growing louder and more deprecating that seeks to condemn more and more men. Do all men suck? No. But as more and more women hear this story about men they will only believe this characterization. At some point good men and women need to put a halt to the spread of this disinformation.