Jill Missal has crushes from afar on the same type of guy … over and over and over again.
I’ve written on my blog about men who frustrate me, debated male and female roles, called out men who pretend women are invisible, talked about men who hog all the gear on treks; and despite the fact that I have a substantial male readership, it must seem like there are times I really don’t like men.
But I do.
So today I’d write about the men that I like. You see, there is a particular kind of man for whom I fall. Occasionally I find myself in the throes of these massive platonic crushes; always on a man of a particular type. I find these men so admirable as to be irresistible, but not in any sort of sexual or romantic way. It’s less about relationship potential or physical attraction or legitimate desire and more about utter, stunning veneration. To this day not a single one of them knows that they were the object of one of my big crushes and very few people know that I even get this way (uh, until now).
♦◊♦
You probably noticed the disclamatory “platonic” statement in there. Again, these aren’t romantic crushes. The men are almost never available, usually not of my generation, and just not ever courtship potential, in large part because I admire them so very much that I immediately put them on a pedestal and stop considering them to be human and think of them more like mystical heroes. We all know that’s a terrible way to foster a relationship anyway, so I just leave them up there where I don’t have to learn about their flaws (which I would dismiss and forgive anyway, because I think these men are just that great).
What makes me admire these men so fiercely is their mastery of their chosen craft, their utter self-assuredness, and open demeanor. Each one of these men has been capable to the extreme, to the point that things like plane crashes, avalanches, earthquakes, and civil wars won’t even shake them up. They’d just handle it. They are down-to-earth almost to a ridiculous level, because they know that they don’t have anything whatsoever to prove. Contrast that with an insecure dude who will turn himself inside out rather than admit he doesn’t know how to work the jack to change a tire even though he’s been talking like he’s been a master mechanic for the last ten years, and you get the picture. The men I admire don’t have to talk themselves up. They’re so dialed that words wouldn’t be adequate anyway (sorry, that’s my crushiness talking).
These men don’t waste time with ego-stroking posturing or bravado. They just go get the job done. They’re already an order of magnitude cooler than anyone else so they don’t have any reason to prove it. They’re more likely to stand back and let the young guns charge in because they know that if things go south, they can take charge and make things right as rain again.
♦◊♦
Sometimes I wonder why I almost always get these crushes on men who are older than me. A few times I’ve crushed on men my age but it’s not as common (not that this is totally “common” anyway, but I think the ratio over my lifetime of older to my-age crush targets is like 4:1). I think it’s because a lot of men of my age haven’t reached the point in their lives at which they are utterly confident in their abilities, and when they are confident in their abilities they’re not totally confident in themselves. So they tend to act disdainful to those who have lesser abilities, rather than help them along or just plain be friendly. They might be good at what they do but they’re still finding it necessary to prove it. It’s hard to find men my age who are dialed-in like the ones I’m talking about, and I don’t have the detection skills necessary to choose the ones who have the potential to get there, and someone else has usually snapped them up already anyway (I don’t move fast when it comes to relationships. Some describe my pace as “glacial.” Not a very effective strategy). So all I can do is crush from afar; most of the time from a generation away and light-years’ distance in “cool.”
You’re probably thinking the obvious; that I crush on men who are older, wiser, and more capable than my peers because I’m comparing them to the default ultimate measure in manliness, my own father. I wasn’t going to get Freudian here. But so what if I’ve got daddy issues? My dad was a professional helicopter pilot for twenty years, flying an incredibly complex and tightly coupled machine in the worst weather imaginable. The kind of weather that makes most people frantically clean off grocery store shelves and stock up on ‘essentials’ like whiskey, candy, and blue-box mac and cheese and then sit in their cozy Barcaloungers watching CNN weather reports on their flat screens and letting the anticipation whip them into an histrionic social media frenzy. He’d fly in that weather to pull distressed people off of sinking boats, lift hypothermic and nearly-dead fishermen out of the freezing Arctic water, rescue lost souls off of islands you don’t even know exist, and bring back victims of plane crashes and other catastrophies, restoring families and saving lives and generally being a real-life honest-to-Pete hero. When my dad walked with the rest of the Coast Guard crew in the town’s 4th of July parade, the cheering was deafening. If that’s my yardstick then you can probably understand why the bar is set pretty high.


Interesting post – very honest, detailed, and candid. Two questions:
1. The kind of men you describe tend to be a little more introverted and express less vulnerability – ie have a calm, cool demeanor that’s not prone to expressing their feelings verbally. Is the pressure on men to “express their feelings” etc overblown?
2. You’re careful to specifically point out that these are not the men you crush on in a romantic or sexual way. What are the kinds of men you find romantically/sexually attractive? And why the difference?
Thanks – again, great post.
Thank you, I’m glad you liked it! 1. I think it’s just personal preference. Some people like a lot of emotional vulnerability and general expressiveness; some don’t. I don’t really like a lot of outward emotional display, personally, unless it’s on a very personal and private level, so I find men who have a calm and collected exterior quite attractive. 2. I think if I could find those attributes in a man both available and more age-appropriate, I would find them romantically/sexually attractive. They just seem to be rare in men my age who are also available (which makes total… Read more »
With all the climate references, it sounds like you are a subscriber to AlaskaMen Magazine. If you are, as you put it, glacial in moving forward with relationships, love in a cold climate may be the answer. I know from experience that log cabins can be hyper insulated and very steamy. One thing that is not clear is how old was your father when he was plucking people from glacial seas? How does that compare with your age now? It would seem that there is an impossible standard – the age gap does not decrease, and by the time the… Read more »
If you are, as you put it, glacial in moving forward with relationships, love in a cold climate may be the answer.
As the saying goes here in Montana and up in Alaska, the odds are good, but the goods are odd.
Even that’s not true anymore, at least in Alaska. I can’t tell you how many parties I’ve gone to recently that were heavy on women, light on dudes. That’s really, really bad news when there’s so many odd goods to work with!
Except that Alaska Men magazine is for lonely hearted saps! Just kidding. Though I do live in Alaska, so I enjoyed your observation about all the climate references (which I didn’t do on purpose). I don’t know what it is. I’m not attracted romantically to the men I admire in this way; I just think they’re utterly awesome. Impossible standard? Maybe…but life’s not over yet. Interesting idea re: age. My dad was flying when he was around my current age. I think I was nine or so when he retired from that kind of flying, though he flew in less-stressful… Read more »
Jill – Age is not everything. But it can allow maturity. It’s like wine – some guys are best served young, fruity and chilled. Others are best left to lie down from a decade or two, and the you serve them with a log fire to bring out the real depth of taste and character. Of course doing the means you will find a few that are well and truly corked. On the other hand – advertising and branding can get in the way. I saw an interesting experiment recently. The chef Heston Blumenthal took some very cheep German wine… Read more »
“Well and truly corked.” Hee! Nice.
Given your glacial outlook and that communication has hotted up – I do need to make clear that I am in fact Vintage Port – and still held in a bonded warehouse, Oporto, Portugal.
Maybe in another 20 years! P^)
… well that is my story, and I’m sticking with it!
Hotted up? My next article has got to be about why men always think I’m flirting with them online! 😉
.. because men are always crass, drinking or corked! 😉
I may have to write a piece about why literary play is seen as flirting by so many! Is humor and flirting the same thing?
Cheers!
As long as it’s fun it can be anything, really!
And don’t forget that sometimes men are awesome.
“And don’t forget that sometimes men are awesome.”
We try our best – but we aint gods!
To err is human – to forgive is beyond the ability of so many! 😉