Someone called me a “libtard” on social media. This is a blending of the words “liberal” and “retarded” a highly offensive word for people with developmental disabilities. The thing is, this guy had no idea I used to be a Republican. A staunch conservative pro-lifer, in fact. Like most people who are conservative, I was born into a family of conservatives. I accepted what I was taught: Democrats were bleeding hearts with no moral foundation; Democrats want to give money to people who don’t want to work for it; Democrats are pro-abortion; Democrats are stupid.
My interaction with Democrats was limited. Aside from their political views, I generally found them to be nice people. I never bothered to ask them how they came to those beliefs. I just assumed all of my preconceptions were correct. We could never be actual friends.
My transition began slowly enough. I’d been through a divorce and began questioning long-held religious points of view that weren’t matching my reality. But in graduate school, following my divorce, is when the wheels fell off. I started studying perception, belief and the way in which our worldviews are formed. I learned that much of what we believe has little to do with facts, and much more to do with how we feel about any given topic.
Still, in the 2008 election, I could not vote for Barrack Obama. Questions about his birth, stories of his questionable intellect, and his ties to Muslims caused me to cast my vote for a third party candidate. You have to remember; this is when Sarah Palin was John McCain’s running mate. I couldn’t, in good conscience, vote for someone so unhinged. I did not celebrate Obama’s win. I waited, in terror, to see what would happen.
|
Today’s Republican Party developed out of disenchantment with the passage of civil rights.
|
In 2012, still unconvinced, I voted for Mitt Romney and cringed when Obama won again. I had been influenced by Dinesh D’Souza’s film Obama’s America, which made it appear Obama did not like America and was determined to destroy it, based on his radical Muslim influences. I was afraid of what the next four years would look like.
At the same time, with the release of my first book, I reconnected with my Native American heritage and began learning about what happened to our tribe. It wasn’t anything like the story of Pocahontas I’d been taught in school. Then again, the beginning of the current Republican Party wasn’t talked about in any of my social study classes in high school.
Today’s Republican Party developed out of disenchantment with the passage of civil rights. Barry Goldwater and Richard Nixon tapped into white anger over the federal government’s enforcement to end segregation, pulling in many Southern Democrats and redefining party lines. The argument was made for “state’s rights,” but played into the fears of white voters. Lyndon B. Johnson took the side of civil rights and many black voters, simultaneously, joined the Democratic Party. This was a definitive change from the “Party of Lincoln,” which believed civil rights and equal rights were for everyone.
Like gay rights today, racial civil rights carried a religious undertone. Evangelical and conservative churches were opposed to civil rights and the Republican Party assuaged their concerns. In fact, Bob Jones, Sr., famously gave a 1960s sermon in which he stated “When you run into conflict with God’s established order racially, you have trouble…You produce destruction and trouble, and this nation is in the greatest danger it has ever been in in its history.”
Goldwater’s political strategist, Paul Weyrich, took this further by looking for issues that concerned Christian fundamentalists, a largely untapped voting block in the late 1960s and early ‘70s. Abortion was the ticket. Millions of Christians still vote Republican based on the well-ingrained belief that Republicans will stop abortions. It’s the one area where states rights don’t apply because, many Republicans believe, abortions should be illegal for everyone. Never mind that abortion rights have largely remained unchanged since 1973.
While the Republican Party says it stands against abortion, the truth is that abortion rates have continually dropped since 1984, regardless of which party is in office. But Republican sponsored abstinence only programs threaten to reverse this decrease. 18% of abortions are performed on teenagers and 75% of people who get abortions are poor. In fact, many of the economic factors that lead people to get abortions are not addressed by Republicans, and are virtually ignored by “prolifers.” The pro-life mantra is a misnomer, detracting from larger, underlying issues.
|
Republican ideologies ignore significant historical data, and remain, primarily, the party dedicated to preserving white male causes to the exclusion of minorities, women, and those who don’t fit their narrow version of “normal.”
|
Additionally, the Republican Party, which clamors about smaller government, has historically created larger governments and more government spending than Democrats. Ronald Regan and George W. Bush spent more federal money than anyone at nearly 20% and 46% respectively. Public policy researcher, John Goodman said, “Lyndon Johnson, of course, gave us Medicare, Medicaid and the rest of the Great Society. But when Johnson left office, these programs were relatively small. The main expansion came under Republican presidents Richard Nixon and Gerald Ford. Not only that, the expansions were largely the result of executive orders!”
I found I could no longer support Republican causes, which are the antithesis of my personal beliefs and experiences. Republican ideologies ignore significant historical data, and remain, primarily, the party dedicated to preserving white male causes to the exclusion of minorities, women, and those who don’t fit their narrow version of “normal.” And by the way, denigrating people with developmental disabilities is just such an example.
America is one of the richest nations in the world with a diverse population. To become a “great” country, policies must be inclusive. Our values must include plans to propel our citizens to the forefront of globalization through education, opportunity, and social equality. If that makes me a “libtard,” so be it. At least I can tell you why and how I came to my conclusions. Can you tell me how you came to yours?
—
Originally Published on Huffington Post
Interested in where we go from here? Join our Post Election Rebuilding Social Interest Group. Weekly calls. A community of people working to figure out where we go next.
Photo: Getty Images



I’d like to ask a question. Liberals are all about human rights. Fair? They are also very committed to animal rights. Resorting to very odd actions based on very little knowledge of the animal’s actual mindset. And yet they have no issue aborting probably millions of human fetuses a year, yet save thousands of minks and chickens. Does this make any sense? On the basis of a political stance on women’s right to choose? Therefore I must conclude that liberals in fact DON’T value human life, certainly far in excess of animals. In fact they consider a human fetus to… Read more »
Thank you Tim for this inspiring article!
Yep. Same here. Bob Jones’ vision for America became frighteningly clear when I lived in Greenville SC down the street from his university. Women’s place was home, quiet, attractive and under a man’s thumb. No racial mixing ever, and evil Hollywood is leading the country to hell. Sigh. The Cleavers and Brady Bunch wasn’t reality, and still isn’t. I prefer having my Christianity lived not legislated into far reaching side effects that I didn’t anticipate. If that makes me a libtard, meh bite me. I was a proud republican until recently. And Donald Trump and his angry baby boomer white… Read more »
The title mentions globalization. I have yet to see the case made for political globalization. It’s hardly obvious and incredibly dangerous.
I think you conflate social conservatives and fiscal conservatives. Unfortunately, there are few fiscal conservatives. The democrats want to tax and spend. The republicans choose to borrow and spend. I tend to support the democrats when it comes to this. I don’t have an issue soaking the rich because I’m not one of them. Of course they resist it as the middle class and the poor resist taxes that fall upon them. I also don’t have the illusions that the wealthy will simply pay the higher taxes. They’ll shift the bill to the middle class or poor or simply find… Read more »
“18% of abortions are performed on teenagers and 75% of people who get abortions are poor. In fact, many of the economic factors that lead people to get abortions are not addressed by Republicans, and are virtually ignored by “prolifers.””
Funny thing about “progressives” is that they only care about the economic impact of an unwanted child upon it’s mother. When you ask about the father, well then abstinence only becomes a real alternative. He should have kept it in his pants. Sounds pretty hypocritical. Can’t support man hating.
“Largely missing from the debate, though, is discussion of abortion’s racial disparity: Although rates among Hispanic and African-American women have decreased along with the rest of the country, they remain significantly higher than the national average.”
“Minority women constitute only about 13% of the female population (age 15-44) in the United States, but they underwent approximately 36% of the abortions.”
“According to the Alan Guttmacher Institute, black women are more than 5 times as likely as white women to have an abortion”
http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/09/abortions-racial-gap/380251/
–i appreciate what you say, and understand your changing over. how do you answer the question that USA could not afford to go in the same direction of over sized costs of Govt [20+ Trillion Debt]. Would 40+ Trillion be too much? Hillary would have brought us there. One aim that Trump has is to get more people that A.] work 40+ hrs week B]. earn higher wages C.] contribute more Income Tax D.] spend $$$. This scenario helps ALL Americans, in every aspect of Society. (PS: i already know Progressives disagree with that concept.) Globalization is romanticized by Progressives.… Read more »
Great questions. The debt is definitely a problem. As I pointed out in the article, Republicans are the ones who historically create larger governments and bigger debts. According to Forbes (link below), Trump’s plan will add trillions to the deficit, whereas Clinton’s plan would have cut the deficit and raised taxes on the wealthy, presumably by closing tax loopholes. Donald Trump has never said how he plans to get people to work for more wages. For that matter, he never says anything of substance. We will all find out together, unfortunately. Your statement that progressives disagree with getting more people… Read more »
94,000,000 no longer in the workforce, $8 trillion more to the debt with zero to show for it, ISIS steamrolling and spreading, 10 million more relying on food stamps than when Obama entered office, a Middle East spiraling out of control, wages down, crime up… Verses “speculations” about Trump
@Tom — Wow…those are some impressive numbers. They’d be even more impressive if you could provide some actual proof of those numbers. Take your time, I’ll be waiting.
$18.1 Trillion: Total Debt Under Obama As Of January 14, 2014. (U.S. Treasury Department, Accessed 1/14/15) $10.6 Trillion: Total Debt When Obama Became President On January 20, 2009. (U.S. Treasury Department, Accessed 1/9/15) $7.5 Trillion: Amount Added To The National Debt Despite Obama’s 2010 State Of The Union Declaration That He Would Not Leave “A Mountain Of Debt.” (U.S. Treasury Department, Accessed 1/14/15; President Barack Obama, Remarks On The State Of The Union, Washington, D.C., 1/27/10) $4 Trillion: Amount Of Debt That Obama Once Called “Irresponsible” And “Unpatriotic.” (Sen. Barack Obama, Remarks At A Campaign Event, Fargo, ND, 7/3/08) $1.8… Read more »
I doubt they’ll even consider the numbers. The fact that someone can sit through the past 8 years and then blithely claim that Republican governments are the ones who grow the deficits is just funny.
Neither party has any moral high ground when it comes to debt.
I also love Mr. Rymel’s posting about abortion numbers of poor and minorities as if they are something to be supportive of. What kind of a person would tout the death of millions?
MGM, I provided you with the numbers …
The reason I brought up the spread of Political Islam is that Globalization = Open Borders = Spread of Islamic State. Europe is regretting it big time right now, and they’re rolling up the carpets as fast as they can. Trump is merely on the curve.