This is about thinking.
Montaigne ended his life by saying “Que scais je?” on his deathbed.thoughts and thinking dog Montaigne. A man who probably spent more time thinking and searching for answers than anyone else in history. And he ends his life asking “what do I know?”
Whew. And the thinking was his life.
“ … a man of thought must feel the thought that is parent to the universe.”
Ralph Waldo Emerson on Montaigne
As I sifted through some boxes of books the other day I came across my beautiful 1946 edition of The Essays of Montaigne. A wonderful book that explores thought on an astounding array of topics. When reading it one truly understands when Emerson says “he is never dull, never insincere, and has the genius to make the reader care for all that he cares for.”
I love it because Montaigne is this everyday person
and the ultimate thoughtful thinker.
Reading his essays is like having a conversation with a casual acquaintance on a variety of topics … skipping from thought to thought like children exploring the old forest in the backyard with a new friend.
He makes you think of little things … in big ways.
Auguste Collignon’s grave in the Pere Lachaise cemetery reads … “lived to do right, and had formed himself to virtue on the Essays of Montaigne.”
The essays of Montaigne provide context to thinking. And frankly, we could do a lot worse than living a Life formed on the virtue of Montaigne’s Essays.
And I believe that is what Ralph was trying to tell us.
Thinking, in general, is cheap. Easily done and easily wasted.
Individual thoughts can roam aimlessly without any direction and without regard for any repercussions they may reap as they leave those, who actually think about those thoughts, behind.
The real thinkers?
The real thought?
At some point to be ‘real’ it must explore the foundation and seek the roots of individual ideas and thoughts. There has to be something to provide context and ground the thought in something meaningful beyond ‘I think.’. Without feeling the ‘thought that is a parent to the universe’ you may find your thinking, and thoughts, comfortable in the mind, you may even find you are even pretty satisfied with yourself, yet you have simply reached a place where thoughts can vanish … untraceable and undiscovered.
They are thoughts floating at the mercy of Life’s breeze.
At its worst, it is lazy thinking.
At its best, it is simply mental masturbation.
Thoughts are truly invisible until they meet their parents
and look at each other eye to eye. That is what I believe Emerson was asking us to think about. It is a fair request.
As Emerson stated:
EVERY FACT is related on one side to sensation, and on the other to morals. The game of thought is, on the appearance of one of these two sides, to find the other: given the upper, to find the underside. Nothing so thin but has these two faces, and when the observer has seen the obverse, he turns it over to see the reverse. Life is a pitching of this penny,- heads or tails. We never tire of this game, because there is still a slight shudder of astonishment at the exhibition of the other face, at the contrast of the two faces. A man is flushed with success, and bethinks himself what this good luck signifies. He drives his bargain in the street, but it occurs that he also is bought and sold. He sees the beauty of a human face and searches the cause of that beauty, which must be more beautiful. He builds his fortunes, maintains the laws, cherishes his children; but he asks himself, Why? and where to? This head and this tail are called, in the language of philosophy, Infinite and Finite; Relative and Absolute; Apparent and Real, and many fine names beside.
Emerson called Montaigne a skeptic. With all due respect, I am not sure I agree. Montaigne was a pragmatic thinker. He avoided the extreme. As Emerson did suggest … “He labors to plant his feet, to be the beam of the balance.” I do not believe that is a skeptic. I find that pragmatic. I find that using a good dose of common sense. And I even find that for a truly deep thinker he had the ability to make the thinking non-complicated.
As all thinkers should, he believed in all and believed in nothing. He took scraps of truth found in everything and pieced them together as if building a puzzle.
“ … not at all of the unbelief; not at all of universal denying, nor of universal doubting. He is considered, the prudent, taking in sail, counting stock, husbanding his means, believing that a man has too many enemies than that he can afford to be his own foe.”
Emerson on Montaigne
We cannot be all like Montaigne, but we can all be better thinkers … better considerers … better at husbanding our thoughts.
I will end with 2 thoughts:
Profound thought is an exception, not the rule. Here is Emerson’s full quote reference.
The final solution in which skepticism is lost is in the moral sentiment, which never forfeits its supremacy. All moods may be safely tried, and their weight allowed to all objections: the moral sentiment as easily outweighs them all, as anyone. This is the drop that balances the sea. I play with the miscellany of facts and take those superficial views which we call skepticism, but I know that they will presently appear to me in that order which makes skepticism impossible. A man of thought must feel the thought that is the parent of the universe; that the masses of nature do undulate and flow.
The reason, the prized reality, the Law, is apprehended, now and then, for a serene and profound moment amidst the hubbub of cares and works which have no direct bearing on it;- is then lost for months or years, and again found for an interval, to be lost again. If we compute it in time, we may, in fifty years, have half a dozen reasonable hours.
‘… Reason is apprehended now and then for a profound moment amidst the hubbub of cares … we may in 5o years have a half dozen reasonable hours.’ (Emerson)
And that, my friends, is stated by one of the greatest thinkers of that generation discussing one of the greatest thinkers of another generation..
Bigger thoughts, big ideas, and deep thinking are exceptions rather than the rule.
True deep thought has its rare victories. We may feel reasonable in how we think and when we think and even how often we think deeply about things, but the profound moments of reason are fleeting and rare.
Why do I say that? For perspective.
I don’t say it to discourage anyone from deep thinking but rather simply to give perspective. It is a good reminder to keep those of us who like to think … well … humble.
Deep thought comes at a price. Or, maybe better said, deep thinking does not increase the value of self-worth. Montaigne said: “There is no man, in his opinion, who has not deserved hanging five or six times; and he pretends no exception in his own behalf. Five or six as ridiculous stories,” too, he says, can be told of me, as of any man living.”
So not only is clarity of Reason few within a lifetime, but it is combined with the fact we, probably in the same quantity as the few victories, connect thought to act in a way that “we deserve hanging.”
Deep thought’s price is a few victories and more mistakes.
Deep thought is not for the faint of heart or for those who need ‘wins’ to feel good about themselves or find self-actualization.
Deep thought is not always ‘reasonable’ nor even right all the time. So what does that mean? Deep thought is that, and only that … deep. Being thoughtful does not mean being right.
Why do I say that? Once again not to discourage deep thinking but rather to suggest deep thinking is a journey in which you will find scattered right, and wrong, thoughts as way stations along the way. And you will most likely stop at a number of both types of stations to rest your thinking.
The real moral? Keep moving. Stay on the journey.
Thinking is good.
Deep thoughts and thinking is even better.
My deep thought ends like this.
Montaigne ended his life on his deathbed saying “Que scais je?”
Would not that more of us said this to ourselves every day … what do I know?
Emerson … “Consent yourself to be an organ of your highest thought, and lo! suddenly you put all men in your debt, and are the fountain of an energy that goes pulsing on with waves of benefit to the borders of society, to the circumference of things.”
Consent yourself to be of your highest thought. Good advice for anyone.
What’s Next? Talk with others. Take action.
We are proud of our SOCIAL INTEREST GROUPS—WEEKLY PHONE CALLS to discuss, gain insights, build communities— and help solve some of the most difficult challenges the world has today. Calls are for Members Only (although you can join the first call for free). Not yet a member of The Good Men Project? Join below!
Join the Conscious Intersectionality FACEBOOK GROUP here. Includes our new call series on Human Rights.
Join The Good Men Project Community
All levels get to view The Good Men Project site AD-FREE. The $50 Platinum Level is an ALL-ACCESS PASS—join as many groups and classes as you want for the entire year. The $25 Gold Level gives you access to any ONE Social Interest Group and ONE Class–and other benefits listed below the form. Or…for $12, join as a Bronze Member and support our mission, and have a great ad-free viewing experience.
Register New Account
Please note: If you are already a writer/contributor at The Good Men Project, log in here before registering. (Request a new password if needed).
ANNUAL PLATINUM membership ($50 per year) includes:
1. AN ALL ACCESS PASS — Join ANY and ALL of our weekly calls, Social Interest Groups, classes, workshops, and private Facebook groups. We have at least one group phone call or online class every day of the week.
2. See the website with no ads when logged in!
3. MEMBER commenting badge.
ANNUAL GOLD membership ($25 per year) includes all the benefits above — but only ONE Weekly Social Interest Group and ONE class.
ANNUAL BRONZE membership ($12 per year) is great if you are not ready to join the full conversation but want to support our mission anyway. You’ll still get a BRONZE commenting badge, and you can pop into any of our weekly Friday Calls with the Publisher when you have time. This is for people who believe—like we do—that this conversation about men and changing roles and goodness in the 21st century is one of the most important conversations you can have today.
We have pioneered the largest worldwide conversation about what it means to be a good man in the 21st century. Your support of our work is inspiring and invaluable.
This post was previously published on Enlightened Conflict and is reprinted with the permission of the author.
Photo courtesy Pixabay.