The Exquisite Lover, Part One

How exactly does one become an amazing lover? “Passionate virtuosity” explains Jackie Summers

“Technique in art has the same value as technique in love-making. On the one hand, heartfelt ineptitude has its appeal, and on the other hand, so does heartless skill; what you want is passionate virtuosity.” - John Barth

Last year in the World Peace series I extolled the virtues of “spine-tingling, goose bump-raising, electrifying, all is right with the world sex, the kind that makes you skip for no reason, not care if your boss yells at you, or if your car payment is late.” But what quantifies “great” sex? How exactly does one become an amazing lover?

For the record, given the vast realm of what can be enjoyed sexually, my tastes are admittedly fairly vanilla. That said, regardless of your fetishes or predilections, for the purpose of argument we will operate on the supposition that great sex is based on a combination of the following three factors:

1) Passion: your enthusiasm for the act of intimacy and/or your partner
2) Technique: skill and physical compatibility, and
3) Resonance: your emotional connection to the person you’re intimate with.

This presents some interesting scenarios. Any two combinations of the above can result in pretty good, but not great sex. Technique removed from passion is cold and mechanical. Clumsy enthusiasm is annoying. Being emotionally connected to someone with whom you’re physically incompatible is incredibly frustrating. The elusive and complex cocktail we seek ideally requires all three.

And it all begins with passion.

“Whereas circe turned men into pigs, art turns us fully into people” according to Baltasar Gracian. “Passion separates art from artifice;” it’s the difference between sleight of hand and alchemy, between parlor tricks and magic. Passion is raw unchecked emotion; it’s animalistic, bestial and not meant to be controlled. Passion transforms technique into art, elevates a physical act into a transcendental one by seamlessly melding art and science. All great artists, be they great musicians, painters or great lovers all have this in common, and it’s not technical proficiency: it’s how they make you feel.

If you never feel like you want to cut off an ear, you’ll never paint Starry Night or enjoy the kind of sex that penetrates a persons soul as deeply as their body.

Unlike orgasms, passion can’t be faked: you either have it or you don’t. Passion and technique can combine to create a powerful sexual chemistry. I’m on record as saying “technique can be learned by anyone; you can’t teach passion.” However, if you already feel passionate about the person that you’re with, where and how does one learn technique?

***

Read The Exquisite Lover, Part Two, here.

***

© J Summers 2012

photo of man and woman holding each other with love by Shutterstock

About Jackie Summers

Jackie Summers is an author and entrepreneur. His blog F*cking in Brooklyn chronicles his quest to become a person worthy of love. His company, Jack From Brooklyn, Inc. houses his creative and entrepreneurial enterprises. Follow him on Twitter @jackfrombkln and friend him on Facebook

Comments

  1. Gordon says:

    Great ending question! I think that technique is learned through experimentation. The real problem is that you cant teach someone to have rythm!

  2. Erin says:

    Nice article Jackie. I think a lot of sex infomation has become about “parlor tricks”. Whether it’s female media or male” “Do this, twist that way, use this object, watch this and your sex life will be great!”, it says. I think you can get so wrapped up in what your being told to do, or only what you want to do, that there is an inauthenticity about it all. But your article is geninune and appears to be not only about amazing sex but true connection and intimacy. I often fear that society has forgetten that sex is at the heart of it a communication, a deep commnication. Not just a process for the end result, orgasm, then rinse, lather and repeat.

    • Erin, parlor tricks are lovely for the parlor; notsomuch for the boudoir. This is why passion had to be the first in this series: without passion, any technique–no matter how masterful–feels cold and artificial. In the next two parts of this series, we’ll examine both technique and resonance, and why all three are needed if one desires more than performance for performance’s sake.

      JFB

  3. Bruce says:

    Intimacy, sex, and romance in bed is like dancing; you either have it or you dont. Rhythm cant be coached.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] The Exquisite Lover, Part One [...]

  2. [...] In The Exquisite Lover part 1 we compared sex without passion to food without spice: edible but unappetizing. Simply put, everybody should cook and fuck with passion, or don’t bother. In part 2 readers were admonished to master technique as a method of demonstrating expert execution of enthusiasm. “Learn technique; have full command to the extent of not being conscious of how it is done” said Sergei Bongart. “When craftsmanship has been developed, you are free to create… technique will give way to expression!” [...]

Speak Your Mind

*