'Love Is Blind' Edited MAGA Men Getting Rejected

There’s a big difference between reality and reality television.

A lot of reality television shows are heavily edited to fit a certain narrative that doesn’t faithfully match what someone would experience in the real dating world.

Contestants are often made to pre-record lists of random words so that they can be edited to say whatever the showrunners want them to say. Entire conversations can be cut up and spliced to tell a completely different story than what actually happened.

As a men’s dating coach, I don’t pay all that much attention to reality dating shows for these very reasons. They’re not that useful in gleaning dating wisdom or getting a real pulse on the modern dating scene.

However, there’s some recent news about “Love Is Blind” that caught my attention.

Women who appeared on the show claimed that they were screening out men who voted for Donald Trump, but that those scenes were edited out.

On the show’s official podcast, contestant Keya Kellum revealed:

“Not everything makes the cut, but something I stood really firmly on was my political beliefs. And I had a ton of conversations about that in the pods with men who had opposing beliefs. […] The framing that it is Republican against Democrat is just so not true. It is all of us against hate. And what I do not stand for is hate. […] Someone who is hateful is definitely not going to be laying in bed next to me, or someone voted for hateful (expletive) rhetoric.”

On another podcast called Love To See It, contestant Jessica Barrett talks about her experiences during filming, saying that you don’t get to see any of her conversations about politics:

“I specifically asked everyone, ‘Did you vote for Trump? Are you a Trump supporter?’ And I talked ad nauseam about human rights because that is such a pillar of my life. […] I talked a huge amount about human rights in all capacities — abortion, everything. […] Do you care about other people, or do you not? […] I tried to make it clear that I was happy to have conversations, but I would not be sleeping next to somebody who didn’t feel the same way that I did on these issues.”

Apparently, none of these political discussions made the final cut of the Love Is Blind episodes.

Is it a cover up? A conspiracy to suppress liberal voices?

I think it’s reasonable to expect that polarizing political debates would be edited out of shows that aren’t supposed to be about politics. I don’t think there’s some kind of huge conspiracy here.

However, the fact that all of these political discussions were edited out is a glaring indication of how tone-deaf the showrunners are to the actual modern dating landscape.

Before the alt-right took over the Republican party under the MAGA banner, Republicans and Democrats constantly made efforts to “reach across the aisle” to cooperate on a lot of issues in which they found common ground, at least compared to today. Candidates campaigning on both sides parroted a lot of the same opinions pre-approved by their Super PAC-lobbyist overlords.

In that era, couples and spouses of mixed political affiliations could actually coexist on the basis of their respective parties’ common stances. Or at least tolerate each other better than today.

However, MAGA shoved the Overton window far past where the house even was. The Republican party moved more to the extreme right while the Democrats pretty much just stayed where they were. There’s almost no overlap to be seen in their platforms and goals anymore.

MAGA men have been radicalized by online algorithms. Influencers like Charlie Kirk and Andrew Tate planted a deep seed within them to see women not as equal partners, but as something lesser. You cannot have a healthy relationship with someone who sees you as fundamentally inferior. And today’s dating landscape is littered with these extremists.

Political discourse is more important in dating now than it ever was in recent American history, and women have caught on.

A 2025 report called Romantic Recession by conservative think tank American Enterprise Institute found:

“Six in 10 single women believe that women in the US will be worse off under a second Trump presidency. Most single men do not share these same concerns. […] Unsurprisingly, many straight single women are leery of dating men who support Trump. These feelings are especially strong among college-educated single women — nearly three-quarters of whom say they would be less likely to date a Trump supporter.”

Gee, I wonder why so many women are opposed to dating men who support taking away the rights of racial and gender minorities. They should know that conservative men know what’s best for them, right? I’m being sarcastic, of course.

Political tensions have inherently become a part of modern American dating. There’s just no denying it anymore. And a “reality” show that edits out these kinds of political considerations is making itself less like reality.

Some of these men have become wolves in sheep’s clothing.

There’s unfortunately a subset of conservative men who chose the coward’s way: hiding their political beliefs in an attempt to adapt to this new dating landscape. Apparently, this behavior was showcased on Love Is Blind as well.

On the Love To See It podcast, Jessica Barrett describes a MAGA-aligned contestant who lied about his beliefs in order to get closer to her. She rightfully criticizes the man who was apparently “so embarrassed about your beliefs that you have to lie about them in order to get what you want, who you want.”

Maybe instead of hiding who you really are, take a moment to think about how the policies and practices of the administration you support actively harms the American people, consider how the administration alienates and others women and minorities, and unlock some more empathy within yourself.

Getting better at dating isn’t just about getting better at the behavioral skills I teach such as flirting and seduction; it’s also about becoming a better man who is effortlessly attractive to women. And a huge part of that is being able to connect with them through empathy.

And if you actually have the empathy required to become this effortlessly attractive man who is capable of maintaining healthy, thriving relationships, there’s no way you can support MAGA and all the horrors of this administration.

Jessica was right. Her question about who you voted for is really asking: “Do you care about other people, or do you not?”

Do you think political compatibility is now essential in dating, or are people taking it too far? Tell me your thoughts in the comments!

—

This post was previously published on MEDIUM.COM.

—