—
In which John Green ACTUALLY teaches about the Civil War. In part one of our two part look at the US Civil War, John looks into the causes of the war, and the motivations of the individuals who went to war. The overarching causes and the individual motivations were not always the same, you see. John also looks into why the North won, and whether that outcome was inevitable. The North’s industrial and population advantages are examined, as are the problems of the Confederacy, including its need to build a nation at the same time it was fighting a war. As usual, John doesn’t get much into the actual battle by battle breakdown. He does talk a little about the overarching strategy that won the war, and Grant’s plan to just overwhelm the South with numbers. Grant took a lot of losses in the latter days of the war, but in the end, it did lead to the surrender of the South.
—
—
Transcript Provided by YouTube:
00:00
Hi I’m John Green this is Crash Course US History and today we come at last to the Civil
00:05
War, the conflict that in many ways created a nation. So here’s what you won’t be
00:09
getting today. We will not be describing battles and tactics.
00:12
If that’s your bag, might I suggest Ken Burns or if you prefer books, like 1000 authors,
00:18
my favorites being James McPherson and Shelby Foote.
00:20
And 2. We won’t be bashing and/or praising Abraham Lincoln very much, although we do
00:24
have multiple Lincolns here because we’ve heard that’s good for ratings.
00:27
I mean, to watch or read certain accounts, you would think that the Civil War was a lengthy
00:30
chess game played by Abraham Lincoln against his cunning opponent Abraham Lincoln, but
00:35
of course there were other people involved. We are going to quote a fair bit of Lincoln,
00:39
though, because, you know, that won Tony Kushner an Academy Award nomination.
00:42
3. We won’t be claiming that the Civil War was somehow secretly about something other
00:46
than slavery, because that is just so early 20th century.
00:49
And 4. There will not be a lot of jokes today because hahaha 700,000 people died.
00:55
Mr. Green, actually only 680,000 people died. Yeah, it depends on how you count, you snivelling
01:00
little ghoul. But recent estimates are between 680,000 and 800,000 total casualties. Deadlier
01:06
for Americans than the American Revolution, World War I, World War II, and Vietnam combined.
01:16
intro So let’s start with some basic facts about
01:23
the American Civil War. 1861 to 1865, which corresponded with the presidency of Abraham
01:28
Lincoln. The Union, or more colloquially the North, fought against the forces of the Confederate
01:33
States of America, or the South. Sometimes people call the Union ‘the blue”
01:36
and the confederates “the gray,” but in fact the uniforms weren’t very uniform,
01:40
they were all different kinds of color. And also, with all that dirt and blood, they were
01:44
all just brown. Alright, let’s go to the Thought Bubble.
01:46
You’ll notice from this map that not all the states that held slaves were part of the
01:50
Confederacy. The border states of Kentucky, Missouri, Delaware and Maryland allowed slavery
01:55
and never left the United States. All of these border states were critical to the Union–Maryland
02:00
was north of the nation’s capitol in Washington D.C.; Kentucky controlled the Ohio River;
02:04
Missouri was the gateway to the West; Delaware actually wasn’t that important.
02:08
So none of that should be particularly controversial, unless you’re from Delaware, but the causes
02:13
of the war, that’s another story. The Civil War was about slavery–actual historians will
02:18
back me up on this, like David Goldfield, who wrote, “Both Northerners and Southerners
02:22
recognized slavery as the immediate cause of the Civil War.” Also, Lincoln said in
02:27
his second inaugural address, “One eighth of the whole population were colored slaves,
02:31
not distributed generally over the Union, but localized in the southern part of it.
02:36
These slaves constituted a peculiar and powerful interest. All knew that this interest was,
02:43
somehow, the cause of the war.” That said, in comments lots of people will
02:47
be like, the war was about agriculture versus industry, or the states’ rights to protect
02:51
themselves from the tyranny of a big federal government, but if it were REALLY about that,
02:55
the Civil War would’ve started during the Nullification crisis in the 1830s, when–as
02:59
I’m sure you’ll remember–Andrew Jackson said that South Carolina couldn’t declare
03:03
a federal tariff null in their state. Why didn’t that cause a Civil War?
03:07
The Confederate government passed the first conscription act in American history, implemented
03:10
national taxes, created a national currency, and had a government bureaucracy of about
03:15
70,000 people, more than the federal bureaucracy in Washington D.C.
03:19
Thanks, Thought Bubble. That said, in the beginning of the war, Lincoln deliberately
03:23
tried to downplay the slavery angle, arguing that the war was only about preserving “the
03:28
Union.” But the war was also about religion, for both
03:31
sides. As David Goldfield put it, “In protecting the Revolutionary ideals, northerners would
03:36
preserve God’s plan to extend democracy and Christianity across an unbroken continent
03:41
and around the world. Southerners welcomed a war to create a nation more perfect in its
03:45
fealty to God than the one they had left.” But it’s also important to remember that
03:49
regular soldiers often had more prosaic reasons for going off to fight, as you will eventually
03:53
learn when you are forced to read The Red Badge of Courage,
03:56
Goldfield tells the story of one Alabamian who enlisted only after his girlfriend mailed
04:00
him a dress and told him he should start wearing if he wasn’t willing to go fight.
04:03
And for Northerners, Union, religion and an end to slavery mixed together to form a potent
04:08
rationale for war. It’s summed up nicely by Julia Ward Howe’s words to the song that
04:13
would become famous as the Battle Hymn of the Republic: “As he died to make men holy,
04:18
let us die to make men free.” You thought I was going to sing, but you were wrong.
04:23
So spoiler alert the Union won the war, which in a sense was unsurprising, because they
04:28
had massive advantages: For starters, they had many more people, approximately
04:32
22 million as compared to 9 million in the South, of whom 3.5 million were slaves and
04:38
therefore unlikely to be sympathetic to the Southern cause.
04:40
Also, the north manufactured more than 90% of all goods in America; its factories turned
04:45
out 17 times more textiles than the South, 30 times more shoes and boots, 13 times more
04:51
iron, and 32 times more firearms. Plus, at the outbreak of the war the North
04:55
had twenty thousand miles of railroad compared with the South’s ten thousand.
04:59
This made it easier for the Union to move its army, which over the course of the war
05:02
enlisted more than 2 million men, compared with 900,000 for the Confederacy.
05:06
Even northern agriculture was also more productive, taking greater advantage of mechanization
05:10
than southern farmers did. Really the only advantage the south had was
05:13
better leaders, like most of the tactically famous generals of the Civil War, Robert E.
05:18
Lee, Stonewall Jackson, J. E. B. Stewart, etc., were Southerners. And also, by the way,
05:22
they all had great last words. Lee said “Strike the tent,” Stonewall
05:25
Jackson said “Let us cross over the river and rest under the shade of those trees,”
05:29
and JEB Stuart after being mortally wounded in battle said to his close friend and lieutenant,
05:34
“Honey-bun, how do I look in the face?” Famous Union general Ulysses Grant’s last
05:38
word was “Water,” which isn’t near so good, but he said that last word after having
05:44
survived the war and getting to be, like, President of the United States and stuff.
05:48
Right but anyway, this all raises an interesting question: Was the result of the war a foregone
05:53
conclusion? The Confederacy had to create a nation from
05:55
scratch and build national unity among people who were committed to the autonomy of their
05:59
individual home states. So that’s a problem. And, then there was the issue of overcoming
06:04
class conflicts, especially when the ruling class was often exempted from actually fighting
06:08
in the war. But when you put aside all that nation-building
06:11
stuff and just focus on the actual fighting of the war, the question of the union’s
06:15
inevitable win becomes much trickier. Some have argued that all the Confederacy
06:18
really to do was outlast the Northern efforts to bring them back into the Union, like Washington
06:23
had to do against the British. And the idea was that the war of attrition
06:26
would eventually wear down northern resolve. But, there were two problems with this theory.
06:30
First, the North had such superiority in its resources that it would take a long time to
06:35
wear down. Secondly, fighting a war of attrition would
06:38
be costly to the South, as well and their resources would be depleted long before the
06:43
North’s. Oh it’s time for the Mystery Document? The
06:47
rules here are simple. Woah! That was intense. I try to identify the author of the Mystery
06:51
Document. If I am right, I do not get shocked, but I’m never right because Stan makes it
06:55
too hard. Alright, let’s see what we’ve got today.
06:58
“I therefore determined, first, to use the greatest number of troops practicable against
07:02
the armed force of the enemy, preventing him from using the same force at different seasons
07:07
[and] second, to hammer continuously against the armed force of the enemy and his resources,
07:13
until by mere attrition … there should be nothing left to him but submission.” [1]
07:18
Okay so the strategy of attrition was a Confederate strategy. But, Stan is a jerk.
07:23
But it talks about the enemy AND HIS RESOURCES, which was kind of a Union focus. And more
07:27
importantly, it talks about preventing him from using the same force at different seasons.
07:32
That makes me think it is a Union general. Final answer Ulysses S. Grant. OH HOW DO YOU
07:37
LIKE THEM APPLES. Grant was different from previous Union generals
07:41
in that he was willing to sustain enormous casualties in pursuit of his goal to wear
07:45
down the South. Because of this, Grant was branded a butcher,
07:48
like he was willing to weather incredible losses including the 52,000 men — 41% of
07:54
his army — who were injured or killed at the battles of the Wilderness and Cold Harbor.
07:58
But his grim determination not just to defeat but to destroy his opponent is what made Grant
08:03
one of the first truly modern generals and also the most successful leader the Union
08:08
found. So, Grant’s brutal strategy coupled with
08:10
the vast superiority in Northern resources suggests that the outcome of the Civil war
08:14
really was inevitable, but it also points to some of the reasons to be cautious about
08:18
that conclusion. First off, it took three years before the
08:21
Union actually fully adopted Grant’s strategy, and between 1861 and 1864 it was possible
08:26
that Southern victories would eventually force the Union to give in.
08:30
I mean, the Union lost a lot of battles in the first two years, largely due to ineffective
08:34
General-ing and nothing saps a nation’s motivation for war like losing.
08:38
Now, some argue that the North had superior motivation to prosecute the war because they
08:42
had God on their side and they were against slavery, but that’s also pretty problematic.
08:46
I mean, for many men who joined the federal army, a war to end slavery had very little
08:51
appeal, especially poor enlistees who might be afraid that newly-freed slaves would compete
08:55
with them for jobs. Also, while we are correct in considering
08:59
slavery unjust, southerners who took up arms for the Confederacy saw themselves as engaged
09:03
in a fight for their own freedom, rather than a fight to protect slavery.
09:07
The truth is, when it comes to fighting, motivation is a very tricky business, and I’m most
09:11
comfortable agreeing with James McPherson who argued that motivation waxes and wanes
09:15
with victory, and that the outcome of the war was contingent on a number of turning
09:19
points. And we’re just gonna discuss two of the
09:21
most important: July 1863 and August 1864. July 1863 saw two of the most important Union
09:28
victories in the whole war. In the western theater, General Grant laid siege to and captured
09:32
Vicksburg Mississippi, thus giving the federals control of the lower Mississippi river.
09:36
I mean, by then, the North already had New Orleans, which made it pretty much impossible
09:39
for the Confederates to ship cotton or anything else along the Mississippi River.
09:43
After that, Grant was able to turn his attention to the east with the aforementioned hammering
09:47
of the enemy and their resources. More famously, especially in the eastern part
09:51
of the United States, the first three days of July 1863 saw the battle of Gettysburg
09:55
in Pennsylvania. This was General Lee’s furthest major offensive
09:59
in the north and had he won the battle it is likely that panic would have set in in
10:03
places like Philadelphia and maybe even New York.
10:06
Actually panic did overcome New York in draft riots that killed more than 100 people and
10:10
only ended after troops from Gettysburg were called in.
10:13
I’m not going to go into detail about either of these battles, but they shifted the tide
10:17
of the war in favor of the North, although not enough to bring the war to a quick end.
10:22
Confederate forces would never again threaten a northern city. August 1864 saw another turning
10:27
point that really spelled the doom of the Confederacy, and that was when Union general
10:31
Sherman took Atlanta. Atlanta was a railroad hub and manufacturing center but its capture
10:36
was more significant politically than militarily because it happened close to the election
10:40
of 1864. And that American election was really the
10:44
last time that the Confederate states of America could have won the Civil War.
10:47
It’s easy to forget this, but Lincoln actually had to run for reelection during the Civil
10:52
War, and by the summer of 1864 the war was pretty unpopular and it looked like Lincoln
10:57
might lose. The capture of Atlanta changed public opinion
10:59
about Lincoln and meant it that his Democratic opponent and former top general George McClellan
11:04
didn’t stand a chance of winning, which was really significant for the war because
11:08
Lincoln was committed to ending it with a Union victory and McClellan, meh.
11:12
I think it says a lot about American history that in the end the war’s outcome was insured
11:17
not just by military victories but by a political one.
11:20
Next week, we’ll examine the effects of the Civil War and the enduring questions that
11:23
have arisen out of it, such as who, exactly, freed the slaves? But, until then, thanks
11:27
for watching. Crash Course is produced and directed by Stan
11:30
Muller. The script supervisor is Meredith Danko. Our show is written by my high school
11:34
history teacher, Raoul Meyer, and myself. Our graphics team is Thought Café. And our
11:38
associate producer is Danica Johnson, also responsible for felt Abraham Lincoln.
11:42
If you want to suggest captions for the libertage, you can do so in comments where you can also
11:45
ask questions about today’s video that will be answered by our team of historians.
11:49
Thanks for watching Crash Course and as we say in my hometown, don’t forget to be awesome.
—
This post was previously published on YouTube.
—
Photo credit: Screenshot from video