
This is a depiction of a man I photographed just outside Union Station in Washington, D.C., USA, on Sunday June 3 2012, at about 3 in the afternoon. The man did not notice me when I was taking the shot, which was all right with me. I steal pictures of people when making street photography, hoping always to not be noticed, because I have been the recipient of much disdain, anger, derision and ridicule when I have pointed my camera at people in public.
An example: One night around 9 not long ago, I was in my car, stopped at a red traffic signal over on Glebe Road in Arlington, VA. I had taken a few pictures of a woman in a car next to me (without her noticing me, by the way), and a gentleman in a pickup truck behind me did not like what I had done. He got out of his vehicle and approached.
The gentleman, with a baseball cap crooked on his head, was perturbed and angry and ferocious and maybe even salivating—I swear. He yelled, as if deranged: “What? Are you some kind of a pervert?”
I was scared, much more scared than I was during my first day of school in 1st grade, and I thought that had he a gun—a hand canon or an Uzi, maybe—he would ruthlessly and mercilessly shoot me and terminate my short-lived career as a humble, broke, art-making photographer. As it turned out, the gentleman did not have a hand canon or an Uzi ; or if he did, he didn’t take it out and point it at me and splatter my precious gray matter. That was fortunate, for I was in no mood to teach the gentleman a primer on the wonders and art and history of street photography, and there was more luck for me: The traffic signal changed to green, as if by miracle. I drove off to safety and a new freedom, but I have strayed from our topic: The Sunday picture of a most unfortunate man at Union Station.
I made this picture not because I wish to criticize our society for condoning homelessness and poverty. Nor did I take it to try to say through art that these tragedies are inexcusable and condemnable. No, I took it because I am selfish. I took it because I want to become rich and famous (probably just like you). I took it because I want to win a photography contest. I am submitting the photograph to a contest sponsored by the China Internet Information Center. The center is calling for pictures on poverty and poverty relief efforts, and I want to win it. As I said, I want fame.
My initial, straight, unedited version of this shot is good, but by no means a prize winner. I like the edited version I have posted here much better, although I doubt judges of the contest will go for it. The picture is unconventional and probably wouldn’t make sense if it were shown with a group of traditionally made photographs. The picture probably will make no sense to many while it is shown by itself here on this blog, now that I think about it; however, I think the photograph is a great work of art.
If it does catch on, keen critics might talk about it in the same breath as Pablo Picasso’s “The Old Guitarist,” which is one of its inspirations; and if you ask me, the picture ought to be hanging alongside this essay (as an art, art-essay sort of thing) in Washington’s Corcoran Gallery of Art or in the Hirshhorn Museum or, better still, in the East Wing of the National Gallery of Art, but who cares about a broke photographer’s grandiose ideas and opinions?
Now, let me contradict myself. Upon consideration, I think the damned thing—the damned picture, that is—just might help shame us all into eradicating homelessness and poverty. It might do this despite the contention of the many pessimists who conclude that these scourges—homelessness and poverty—are inherent to, and an incurable malady in, any human society.
–Tim Ruane
June 6 2012

This is depressing. Hello big brother, goodbye privacy….not that this guy was really concerned about it too much apparently.
Sorry only have compliments I think you post is great. I am a follower now. Thank you for liking my blog judysp.wordpress.com I appreciate your support 🙂 cheers Judy
A store security man stopped me in 2008 from photographing shoes inside a dept store in New York. He mumbled something about recent history. Outside it was a totally different story – fair game. Merchandise rules?
I love you work and this is no exception! The ubiquitous nature of this piece is stunning and sad at the same time. I am sorry to hear about your experience but happy you got away relatively unscathed.
Oh, thank you so much. Ilearned early in journalsim that j-ism is dangerous stuff. I worked in an office most of my days as a journalist, but the guys and girls who are out there, particularly those in the war zones, often got it ruff.
That is for sure…I can’t imagine what they go through. Have a superb evening!
its amazing how many people are ready to stand up to photographers, but will not stand up for anything that really matters. i don’t understand exactly how the logic works wherein a person sees a photograph being taken, and then determines that the photographer must be a pervert. and then, moreover, how they then justify their violence towards said photographer, as if they are some sort of super hero street vigilante, which is actually sort of a crime, whereas the photography is not…???….??? but nobody is worried about the countless cameras attached to buildings that are pointed at them.
Wow. your point makes me a whole lot defensive. I just moved to a town that is loaded with traffic speeding cameras. I don’t think that is right or good. A lawyer buddy of mine says that , by law, we have no privacy when in public. I think we ought o change the law. this does smack of big brother, does it not?
If we change the law then we can’t shoot street… But I don’t think the government should spend so much on technology… And I think Facebook and google are much worse than the cameras, but I still use both? We live in a twisted world. Which I suppose is good for art.
ha-ha — what a great comment–yes a twisted world. love ur stuff about Fbook and Google. I hate Facebook but use it shamelessly to promote myself. Google had some personal and embarrassing stuff of mine up there every time someone Googled my name. I was looking for a job and I wouldn’t have hired me id I ahd been the employer adn saw such crazy stuff assoaciated with my name. it took me about 10 days to get rid of. Googel siaid they couldn’t erase it, sent me elsewhere and on and on. You are right.lots of twistedness pain in… Read more »
A great point which you have missed…..this image could be anyone, on any street corner,on any continent. A universal poor man. You don’t have to justify yourself either, you are a social reporter…so everyone else should should wind their necks in! Click on Tim.
Oh yes. Good intelligent points. Thanks.