—
Forgiveness is the cornerstone of most religious and spiritual practices; “to err is human, to forgive divine” is perhaps the most often repeated of the millions of quotes you can find about it.
We all make mistakes, great and small, and it is the hallmark of a good person to be able to own those mistakes and apologize sincerely for them. But when we have been wronged, it takes even greater strength and wisdom to forgive in earnest.
Letting go and moving on is not a reward for the person who hurt you, it is self-care. Most people, at some point in their life will lose a relationship due to divisive behavior. Whether you are the perpetrator or the victim, no one emerges entirely unscathed, no matter what the appearance is.
The most difficult type of forgiveness to muster, however, is for people we choose to continue to engage with; if we determine the offense was not a deal breaker, we then have to renegotiate the terms of the relationship. This is touchy, complicated work. To again trust someone we feel has betrayed us is one of the greatest challenges of intimacy; but without trust, there is no relationship worth fighting for.
To forgive really is divine—for both genders
“To forgive (is) divine” is hardly an exaggeration in many cases; we may look at marriages that continue in spite of infidelity, addiction and other such challenges with a jaundiced eye, but the reality is that marriage is no one-size-fits-all proposition. We all have an idea of what marriage means to us, but it is hardly fair or correct to impose our standards on others. Marriage is, at the end of the day, a partnership, not a fairy tale; and partnerships come in all sorts of valid forms, as long as both parties agree to the rules of engagement.
It is difficult to stand outside of a nonconformist relationship without judgment, but that is what we must strive to do. Unless we suspect abuse, minding our own P’s and Q’s is the way to go. Better to focus on our own support system and clean our own house; are we living in relationships where resentment outweighs enjoyment? And do we understand the fine line between “forgiveness” and “enabling”?
There is a gender bias when it comes to male-female relationships where the dysfunction may cross a line into abuse.
If I told you that I knew a woman in a relationship with a man who doesn’t allow her to have a private e-mail account, who tracks her whereabouts on her phone when she is out running errands, and shows up at her workplace unannounced for no valid reason other than to check on her, you would categorically believe that he is unhealthily jealous, suspicious, and controlling, and may be a danger to her.
However, a woman who exhibits these same behaviors may get a pass as “insecure.”
Because we presume she poses no physical threat (a bizarre presumption in our gun-crazy country), we underplay how this lack of respect and trust wears on, at the very least, her partner’s psyche. Now let’s change the scenario: if the partner being stalked had previously been unfaithful? Most people would give the wronged party the benefit of the doubt, regardless of how crazy their behavior seems out of this context.
But an unhealthy relationship is an unhealthy relationship, and while I have heard plenty of “anything goes” arguments for allowances made for these and other more bizarre “revenge” scenarios, I will assert that if you cannot feel safe in your primary relationship, your only option is to walk away.
Holding your partner prisoner is an unsustainable imbalance and hardly an example of forgiveness.
He does, she does
And we also need to address the gender bias of forgiveness.
It is hard to deny that a woman who “forgives” an errant husband and keeps him on a short leash will generally be perceived as strong.
A man who does the same for his wife will be considered weak for both behaviors.
Both of these stereotypes have an equal chance of being wrong: many women hold on to men they don’t trust out of fear, and many men hold on to women who’ve betrayed them out of genuine love. Again, no one-size-fits-all.
But the most important distinction that must be made is whether or not reconciliatory behaviors are coming from a place of forgiveness or enabling. Handy guide: if you find yourself making excuses for your partner’s hurtful, dangerous, or disrespectful behaviors (“She’s just insecure”) then you are an enabler.
If you make your partner fully culpable for what they’ve done, but are able to feel compassion for their motivation and move past it (after addressing why it was not okay), that’s forgiveness. And never the twain shall meet.
Healthy intimacy is one of the greatest challenges of the human condition; even good relationships are incredibly complicated. Trying to honor our personal truth while engaging respectfully with another person is damned hard work and can never be taken for granted. While the stereotype that women are more likely to be enablers than men may or may not be true, it is important to take a step back and consider how you are approaching the bumps in the road you inevitably face when you are part of a couple.
While in private matters the ability to take ownership for hurtful behaviors and apologize while conversely being able to extend forgiveness when your partner does the same is critical.
In more public scenarios, such as infidelity and addiction, it is important for both sexes to realize that making excuses to yourself and others about your partner’s behavior is enabling, a very slippery slope. When the forgiveness is sincere and encompasses a healthy understanding of the “why” without excusing it, it is always a show of strength, whether you are a man or a woman.
Men who genuinely forgive are not weak—they are divine.
And genuine forgiveness does not mean the relationship has to continue in the same format or at all. You can forgive someone sincerely while saying “I think it is best we go our separate ways.” This is not spite, it is wisdom.
The wisdom to accept that we all make mistakes—and sometimes our mistakes—can be doors to new paths.
◊♦◊
RSVP to join weekly calls on Conscious Intersectionality
—
We are proud of our SOCIAL INTEREST GROUPS—WEEKLY PHONE CALLS to discuss and help solve some of the most difficult challenges the world has today. Calls are for Members Only (although you can join the first call for free). Not yet a member of The Good Men Project? Join now!
Join The Good Men Project Community.
The $50 Platinum Level is an ALL-ACCESS PASS—join as many groups and classes as you want for the entire year. The $20 Gold Level gives you access to any ONE Social Interest Group and ONE Class–and other benefits listed below the form. Or…for $5, join as a Bronze Member and support our mission.
Register New Account
*Payment is by PayPal.
Please note: If you are already a writer/contributor at The Good Men Project, log in here before registering. (Request new password if needed).
◊♦◊
ANNUAL PLATINUM membership ($50 per year) includes:
1. AN ALL ACCESS PASS — Join ANY and ALL of our weekly calls, Social Interest Groups, classes, workshops and private Facebook groups. We have at least one group phone call or online class every day of the week.
2. See the website with no ads when logged in!
3. PLATINUM MEMBER commenting badge and listing on our “Friends of The Good Men Project” page.
***
ANNUAL GOLD membership ($20 per year) includes all the benefits above — but only ONE Weekly Social Interest Group and ONE class.
***
ANNUAL BRONZE membership ($5 per year) is great if you are not ready to join the full conversation but want to support our mission anyway. You’ll still get a BRONZE commenting badge, a listing on our Friends page, and you can pop into any of our weekly Friday Calls with the Publisher when you have time. This is for people who believe—like we do—that this conversation about men and changing roles and goodness in the 21st century is one of the most important conversations you can have today.
♦◊♦
We have calls about these topics 7 days a week! Join us by becoming a Platinum or Gold member. (Click on the graphic for more information about the calls and to RSVP for them.)
♦◊♦
We have pioneered the largest worldwide conversation about what it means to be a good man in the 21st century. Your support of our work is inspiring and invaluable.
◊♦◊
“Here’s the thing about The Good Men Project. We are trying to create big, sweeping, societal changes—–overturn stereotypes, eliminate racism, sexism, homophobia, be a positive force for good for things like education reform and the environment. And we’re also giving individuals the tools they need to make individual change—-with their own relationships, with the way they parent, with their ability to be more conscious, more mindful, and more insightful. For some people, that could get overwhelming. But for those of us here at The Good Men Project, it is not overwhelming. It is simply something we do—–every day. We do it with teamwork, with compassion, with an understanding of systems and how they work, and with shared insights from a diversity of viewpoints.” —– Lisa Hickey, Publisher of The Good Men Project and CEO of Good Men Media Inc.
◊♦◊
Photo: FED X/Flickr
Read Kara Post-Kennedy every week here on The Good Men Project!
And thank you for sharing this!
What’s your take on what you just read?
Comment below or write a response and submit to us your own point of view or reaction here at our Submittable link.
This presents one of the most insightful ways to ponder & consider many facets of relationships with or without trouble/problems (as they may be defined by the individuals involved) in any type of personal relationship. Illuminating the defining points of “enabling” is highly useful in recognizing if one is actually perpetuating the problem the other suffers, or contributing to enabling the sufferer’s healthy solutions of their problems. A fine line indeed. Unconditional forgiveness may often be counter-productive to speedy resolve, but ultimately can prove necessary for the health of each individual involved so they may each move on in their… Read more »
But isn’t the idea that “to forgive is divine” itself an imposition of one set of values on to another?
The gender divide is particularly interesting right now though, because Hillary Clinton’s loyalty to her husband (or at least her decision to not divorce him years ago) is instead being portrayed as a weakness.
When she becomes President she can announce that they have an open marriage. Her bravery knows no bounds really.
How the hell did this get past the censors? ;p
Ah, yeah, was in rare form this morning. That was a factitious comment. It’s a good article that addresses the issue with authenticity. Credit where due.
Thank you…..
All too often gender bias / Double standards are only seen as damaging to women …. needing to be rooted out where men are seen as advantaged, but rarely given the any credence or nearly similar efforts to eliminate them, when men are the disadvantaged.
Very true. Its hard to get acknowledgment of a double standard unless it harms women. Hell sometimes they aren’t even considered double standards (gender based ones) unless they harm women.
Good to see this is changing.