Mostly Straight, Most of the Time

photo greg clements source goodnightboy tumblr

Photo courtesy of Greg Clements

‘I’m not sure there’s a name for what I am,’ says Dillon, a college hockey player. Welcome to the world of the mostly straights.

Dillon, a college varsity hockey goalie, is an eager volunteer for our interview. In fact, he so loves telling his story that he stays beyond the 90 minutes he believes it will take, and offers to come back for the chance to talk some more. When we reschedule, he’s thrilled, and shakes my hand and thanks me four times in the process of leaving.

Besides being remarkably polite, Dillon is talkative, self-aware, and reflective, with an engaging smile and an at-ease quality. Nothing he says feels rehearsed. It’s as if each topic brings forth another triumph, as if he’s discovering his life as he reflects on the questions.

When eventually asked about his sexuality, Dillon isn’t fazed. Though he wants to “fuck lots of girls” before graduation, he’s not entirely heterosexual. “I’m not sure there’s a name for what I am,” he says. He wants this process, this interview, to help him figure it out.

♦♦♦

By his own admission, Dillon says he resides in the “Sexual Netherlands” (his words), a place that exists between heterosexuality and bisexuality. In previous generations, such individuals might have been described as “straight but not narrow,” “bending a little,” and “heteroflexible.”

Dillon is part of a growing trend of young men who are secure in their heterosexuality and yet remain aware of their potential to experience far more—sexual attractions, sexual interactions, crushes, and, ocassionally romantic relationships with other guys. Dillon lives these contradictions—seemingly hetero guys who now reject that label, sexual description, and identity.

And he is not alone. National surveys in the U.S. and Canada show that 3 to 4 percent of male teenagers, when given the choice to select a term that best describes their sexual feelings, desires, and behaviors, opt not for heterosexual, bisexual, or gay, but for “mostly” or “predominantly” heterosexual.

An even higher percentage of post-high-school young-adult men in the U.S. and in a handful of other countries (including New Zealand and Norway) make the same choice. There are now more young men who feel they are “mostly straight” than who say they are bisexual or gay.

To the uninitiated, “mostly straight” is a paradox. These young men fracture the heterosexual agenda—or do we call it a lifestyle? If a guy is not exclusively into girls, he can’t be totally straight. Aren’t you supposed to pick a side?

If a guy is not straight, not bisexual, and not gay—and yet still falls in love and gets an erection—what the hell is he?

It’s a common misconception that the “mostly straight” phenomenon is nothing more than an adolescent foray into sexual experimentation, possibly due to excessive hormones and sexual confusion.

Sizable numbers of young men maintain their “mostly straight” status—not just as adolescents or college students, but as adults. Of the 160 guys we interviewed for a study in 2008 and 2009, nearly one in eight reported same-sex attractions, fantasies, and crushes. The majority had these feelings since high school; a few others developed them more recently. And in a national sample of young men whose average age was 22, the “mostly straight” proportion increased when they completed the same survey six years later.

These men aren’t bisexuals in disguise. They’re not closeted gay men seeking the privileges afforded to heterosexuals in society. They’re not simply tired of sex with women. With the words “mostly straight,” they’re describing a unique sexual identity, their complete romantic self.

♦♦♦

Among the “mostly straights” we surveyed, a few subtypes stood out.

First is the guy whose progressive political leanings lead him to feel constrained by traditional heterosexuality and masculinity, an outdated and unnecessary burden. “I might have been gay if I’d been raised differently,” one said. “Aren’t we all born bisexual and culture pushes us one way or another?” He challenges homophobic customs and assumptions. One such young man sings in a gay chorus; another marches in pride parades as an ally; a third intends to “come out” as mostly straight in the military to test the “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy. He wants to know, how gay does one have to be to count?

Second is the guy who finds guys physically attractive. One interviewee pleaded, “I mean, come on, tell me some guys aren’t hot!” If he finds himself staring at men in the gym, on the sports field, around the neighborhood, and in Details, Instinct, and Vman, then how can he say to himself that he is totally straight? He notices guys in the buff and who are buff, visually appealing, and pleasurable to be around. He wonders if he only desires the toned body, stylistic appearance, and athletic facility—and not the sexuality.

A third guy may admit that he’s a little sexually attracted to guys. It may not be his top priority, but he’ll acknowledge that men occasionally pop up in his masturbatory fantasies. He doesn’t expect to have sex with a man, but he isn’t ruling it out; he has a willingness to experiment. He’s into sexual pleasure without strings, without meaning. Anything is possible, given the right circumstances with the right person. (Well, almost anything: most interviewees drew the line at actual male-male intercourse.)

A fourth guy is a guy like Dillon: he grants that he’s not totally straight, and that his feelings for guys are more than just sexual—they’re romantic. He can imagine experiencing emotional, intimate relationships with other young men. It just seems natural. He’s into cuddling without the pressure of sex, and he could spend countless hours with “special buddies.” He’s been infatuated with best friends, teammates, and videogame partners.

All four guys have one thing in common: unlike their totally straight brothers, they’re not averse to sexual or romantic feelings, encounters, or relationships with other males.

♦♦♦

It’s unlikely that mostly straight youth are limited to just four types. As additional young men recognize and reveal their sexual breadth, they assist all of us to understand previously unrecognized sexual and romantic possibilities. How many of us have these feelings and are clamoring to “come out” as mostly straight?

Indeed, throughout his life, Dillon has had boy chums, boy crushes, and boy infatuations with teammates and best friends. He makes lingering, intense, frequent references to his core group of high-school buddies and to the male companionship he habitually seeks. He readily hugs and even cuddles with male friends while watching a movie and eating popcorn, especially if they are “on the same wavelength.”

Dillon could see himself meeting a guy and together developing a “partnership.” They wouldn’t act on it sexually, but they’d be physically affectionate. Dillon imagines that their relationship would be difficult for others to understand. They’d think it was a gay relationship because of the time he and his partner spent together, the secrets they shared, and the knowing glances, nods, and code words they exchanged. This is the “homosexual thing” that most interests him.

Far more than we realize, young males wait to be released from their heterosexual straightjackets.

Dillon might just show us the way.

—By Ritch Savin-Williams and Kenneth Cohen

 

– photo courtesy Greg Clements 


About Ritch C. Savin-Williams and Kenneth M. Cohen

Ritch C. Savin-Williams, Ph.D., is Professor of Developmental Psychology and Director of Sex and Gender Lab at Cornell University. He is currently investigating the spectrum of sexual development among straight-identified and sexually fluid young men.

Kenneth M. Cohen, Ph.D., is a licensed Clinical Psychologist at Cornell University’s Counseling and Psychological Services, and Lecturer in Cornell’s Department of Human Development.

Comments

  1. John says:

    I’m definetely straight from my childhood, i always attracted to women sexually. But, i realize when having sex with women, you cannot be submissive. They can act dominant, but they using it to just please you, not to please themselves. They always naturally be submissive, means first they want to feel sexy and desired. Thats why so many women reject sex because they are insecure with their bodies, not because they dont find their men sexy. I have sex with men not because i’m attracted to them ( well some guys with handsome face and nice bodies are attractive and sexy, but not even half sexy as average women to me ) , but to feel how it feels to be fucked, by dominant person who really wants you, really lusting for your bodies, really want to fuck your brains out ( and they cant faking when they cum ) . And it feels really amazing, emotionally. Its like different level compared to fucking a women. I dont think women can reach a level of sexual hunger like men can. My fantasy is including gangraped by guys in prison lol. So I’m mostly straight, but sometimes i want to have sex with men, just because i want to be submissive.

    • SB says:

      John: “They can act dominant, but…just to please you, not to please themselves”

      Um…just to clea this up – you can’t say this about all women. Some women prefer to be submissive, justas there are women who prefer to be dominant (see the rise and rise of pegging)!

    • JaneMarch33 says:

      Your quote “I don’t think women can reach a level of sexual hunger that men can” . You obviously have never met me. Talk to some of my former male partners and they will set you “straight” so to speak!

  2. Paula says:

    How about we just stop trying to slap labels on it — I think we used labels just to make other people feel comfortable.

    If we lived in a world where sexual expression didn’t have to be so rigidly defined (and we weren’t still thinking that sex is less natural and more damaging than violence — censorship boards everywhere) many people would do things they hadn’t considered before. Sex, sexuality, gender, they all exist on a spectrum — even though many have adjusted to add gay and bi, it still doesn’t cut it and no label ever will.

    If we look at the animal kingdom there are males having sex with females, males having sex with males, females having sex with females, males having sex with inanimate things ;) and fish which change sex entirely several times in their lives depending on what is convenient to them.

    We all can learn from the fish.

  3. Gimmel Yod says:

    Actually, -there is a group of men that has had an Internet presence for over a decade & understands this innately. They’re called “g0ys” – spelled w. a zer0. G00GLE ‘em. They’ll redefine your entire paradigm about masculine affection. G0YS: The UNgay men’s movement.

  4. s.m. burton says:

    I have to agree with the guy who said he didn’t think they had a name for what he is. Until my late 30s, I was entirely homosexual and had been throughout life. Without going into too much detail, I transitioned over a few months from gay to bi to straight. That process and its aftermath have not been easy to navigate. Lots of friends, both gay and straight, largely fell out of my life, most all of them by their inability to accept “the new me.”

    Sexually, I can now only interact with women. Emotionally, I connect with guys. I fall in lust with women, but in love with men. That make for a complicated kind of existence. Most no person is going to volunteer for a lifetime of doing without either romantic love or sex. Each person wants the full mixture of all the components of what most people mean by love. My quandary is that I have one-half of the pieces for each puzzle, but not all the pieces for either.

    To this day I don’t know what caused my “change.” Whether it was in part, or in whole, psychological, physical (read hormonal) or by other unknown means, I simply have no clue. In the five years since then, I have remained sexually straight and romantically gay. Don’t think they have a name for it or how to navigate to happiness in that part of my life, but have accepted that things are what they are.

    This article makes me glad to know that others out there don’t fit into neat little labels and have some of the same conflicting desires and emotions as I. Thanks for this wonderful piece.

    • Roberto says:

      Would you give more details? Being romantically with a person involves with sex, or only like a platonic love? What are your relationship status and your sexual history after the sexual orientation shift? Hope your life is all right.

  5. Grero says:

    I wrote a (free!) book on masculinity and same-sex attraction. The main gist is that most men would in fact be attracted to other men, if not for our homophobic culture that prevents such *natural* bonding. For example, in the Roman empire 18 out of 20 of the emperors had boyfriends, that’s 90%!

    It’s available as a free audiobook as well, check it out: http://www.grero.com/

    Let me know what you think, I’ll check back here.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] new Good Men Project post has gone so far to argue that the concept of sexual orientation is gradually becoming an [...]

  2. [...] Mostly Straight: From an otherwise insightful guy who admits “I’m not sure there’s a name for what I am.” [...]

  3. [...] an age where it’s ok to kiss a boy, and like it, Glee’s Kurt Hummel at first seems an anachronistic stereotype. The fashion-conscious flamer, [...]

  4. [...] Mostly Straight, Most of the Time — The Good Men Project Magazine. But today’s porn is nothing like Playboy. It’s video, so the viewer can more easily imagine [...]

  5. [...] an age where it’s OK to kiss a boy and like it, Glee’s Kurt Hummel at first seems an anachronistic stereotype. The fashion-conscious flamer, [...]

  6. [...] a good debate and/or conversation going on. A few days ago I stumbled across this article:  Mostly Straight, Most Of The Time.  It talked about men who often consider themselves “mostly straight,” meaning that more often [...]

  7. [...] orientation. (For another interesting take, check out this Good Men Project post on being ‘mostly straight, most of the time‘.) These examples highlight the potential of erotic capital as a useful sociological concept; [...]

  8. [...] an article from the Good Men Project did just that, finding that a larger and larger number of men are [...]

  9. Websites You Should Visit…

    [...]very few websites that happen to be detailed below, from our point of view are undoubtedly well worth checking out[...]…

  10. [...] in Silicon Valley,” “Non-Monogamy,” and two of my personal favorite posts: “Mostly Straight, Most of the Time,” and “The New Macho.” The last two posts address a topic similar to a post I had [...]

  11. [...] fascinating Good Men Project post “Mostly Straight Most of the Time” talks about men who identify as “mostly straight,” including men who feel politically [...]

Speak Your Mind

*