Politicians, pundits, and lobbyists on the right fling lots of blame on the rise of mass shootings across the United State to anything and everything other than the easy accessibility and massive firing power of guns.
They blame our “soft target schools,” “mental illness,” the “legacy media” who “love mass shootings” because they are ratings bonanzas, the socialist Democrats who “hate the Second Amendment” and who “hate guns,” the bi-coastal “elites,” the so-called “hoplophobes” (“hoplophobia” — from the Greek ὅπλον – hoplon, meaning “arms” or “weapons,” and φόβος – phobos, meaning “fear”), and those who hate America because, as they claim, supporting the unrestricted right to bear arms is “as American as [blood soaked, my addition] apple pie.
In addition, another cause has gained currency on the political right: fatherless homes. Susan L. M. Goldberg of PJMedia, for example, argues:
“Issue number one that no one in the mainstream media or government wants to acknowledge: fatherlessness. Specifically, the impact of fatherlessness on the boys who grew up to become school shooters.”
Goldberg refers to Warren Farrell and John Grey’s newly-released book The Boy Crisis,
“Minimal or no father involvement, whether due to divorce, death, or imprisonment, is common to Adam Lanza, Elliott Rodgers, Dylan Roof and Stephen Paddock….In the case of 19-year-old Nikolas Cruz, he was adopted at birth. His adoptive dad died when Nikolas was much younger, and doubtless, the challenges of this fatherlessness were compounded by the death of his adoptive mom three and a half months ago.”
Yes, it is true that men and boys commit the vast majority of gun murders and injuries in the United States. In the over 50,000 shooting incidents in the United States in 2015, including approximately 372 categorized as “mass shootings” of four or more victims, men, mostly white men, committed the overwhelming majority. And murder is primarily a male act in 90% of the cases when the gender of the perpetrator is known. In mass shootings, 98%+ are enacted my males.
By implication, the right is asserting that either, women-headed households are inferior to those that are male-headed, and, ironically, that a family headed by two fathers in partnership is the best – though they have heartedly disputed this.
Also, while it is certainly the case in some specific instances of mental illness, the clear majority of people with this diagnosis do not manifest violence, and specifically, they are not the primary perpetrators of firearms-related injury and death to others. In fact, they are more times the victims of harassment and violence,
In fact, reports show clearly that mass shootings by people with serious mental illness represent less than 1% of all yearly gun-related homicides. In addition, Columbia University’s Paul Applebaum and Duke’s Jeffrey Swanson found that “only 3-5% of violent acts are attributable to serious mental illness, and most do not involve guns.”
Politicians are merely scapegoating an entire group of people rather than acknowledging the real causes. And while these same politicians call for increased support systems for people with mental health issues, this Republican-dominated Congress has acted to reduce supports.
We as a society must continually investigate how we impose gender-based roles on males and on females, and ways to resolve the long-standing and massive crisis of masculinity. We must ask how our society actually encourages violence committed by men and boys.
The causes for the plague of gun-related murders holding a grip on our nation, nonetheless, is multifaceted and complicated, but not necessarily and only for the reasons articulated on the right. When they mention causes and solutions, they virtually never bring up the words “guns” or “firearms regulations” other than to discount and reject the cause and effect relationship.
The primary distinction separating the United States from other wealthier highly industrialized countries around the world that boast extremely low rates of gun deaths and injuries, in fact, murders overall by any means, is our nations’ disastrous positions on guns and the laws meant to regulate them.
If not, does the United States have so many more cases of mental illness, diagnosed and not? Are schools in the United States significantly “softer targets” than schools, for example, in Australia, Japan, or Sweden? Do boys and young men come from “fatherless” homes at radically higher rates than in these other countries? And why are we not seeing similar violence-prone behaviors in girls and young women from motherless (or fatherless) homes? And why don’t people on the right talk more often about what effects the fathers who remain in the home, but who inflict abuse on family members, have on the behaviors of these members?
As with all large-scale social problems, we miss the key causes and solutions when we focus solely on individualized cases instead of viewing the essential systemic issues?
The major underlying cause by far for the U.S. having the highest rates of firearms deaths and injuries in Western “democracies” is the unprecedented number of these weapons, their relatively easy accessibility, and the lack of political courage by our elected offices to take decided action by placing common-sense safety regulations on the sale, use, capacity, velocity, and amount of guns in private ownership.
Contrary to Executive VP of the National Rifle Association, Wayne LaPierre’s, often-repeated claim:
“To stop a bad guy with a gun, it takes a good guy with a gun.”
More appropriately and going to the root of the NRA’s choke-hold on the political process, I say:
“To stop a bad legislator with the NRA, it takes a good voter with a ballot!”
—
What’s your take on what you just read? Comment below or write a response and submit to us your own point of view or reaction here at the red box, below, which links to our submissions portal.
◊♦◊
Sign up for our Writing Prompts email to receive writing inspiration in your inbox twice per week.
If you believe in the work we are doing here at The Good Men Project, please join us as a Premium Member, today.
All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS.
A $50 annual membership gives you an all-access pass. You can be a part of every call, group, class, and community.
A $25 annual membership gives you access to one class, one Social Interest group, and our online communities.
A $12 annual membership gives you access to our Friday calls with the publisher, our online community.
Register New Account
Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.
Photo Credit: Getty Images