President Trump recently put out an executive order attempting to restrict mail-in voting. Trump loathes mail ballots — except, of course, when he votes by mail himself, as he did this year in Florida.
Broad, cross-partisan swaths of our electorate benefit from this convenient way to exercise our most basic democratic right. Working Americans in particular have a stake in defending mail-in voting.
Economic hurdles to election participation drop when people can fill out their ballots at their kitchen table and pop them in a mailbox. For one thing, you don’t have to worry about asking your boss for time off to go to the polls. Currently, only 21 states require employers to give their workers paid leave for voting, and enforcement of this benefit is weak.
Another seven states offer unpaid time off to cast ballots. But for workers who are barely scraping by, the choice between voting versus making a full day’s pay can be a tough call. Low-income voters are also more likely to have trouble affording costs associated with getting to the polls, such as securing childcare and transportation.
The lack of universal mail-in voting is one factor driving the huge voter participation gap between rich and poor Americans. According to Census data, 76.0 percent of voters with household income above $150,000 voted in the 2024 presidential election, compared to just 34.7 percent of those making between $15,000 and $20,000.
In parts of the country that do allow vote by mail, research indicates that lower-income Americans participate at increased rates. Colorado’s switch to an all-mail election system in 2014, for instance, boosted participation among voters in the bottom income group by 10 percentage points, compared to just a 5-point bump for the state’s richest residents.
A Utah study produced similar findings. In counties with all-mail voting, 79.1 percent of eligible voters in households earning less than $30,000 per year participated in the 2016 general election. In counties that had not yet adopted this voting option, only 74.6 percent in this income group voted.
Utah and Colorado are now among the eight states (plus the District of Columbia) that allow all elections to be conducted entirely by mail. The others are California, Hawai’i, Nevada, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington.
Trump’s order would require the Department of Homeland Security to compile eligible voter lists for each state, based on citizenship and naturalization records, Social Security records, and other databases.
It also orders the U.S. Postal Service to regulate who can and who cannot receive ballots, based on these lists. The American Postal Workers Union immediately blasted the order for contradicting the “fundamental purpose of the U.S. Postal Service and its workforce — to provide universal service to all.” The Postal Service “cannot be used as a tool to disenfranchise voters,” the union stated.
Twenty-three state governments and a coalition of voting rights groups have filed lawsuits to block the order, arguing that it violates states’ constitutional authority over elections. The ACLU points out that the order “risks mass disenfranchisement of eligible voters” because the federal databases it would rely on are outdated and unreliable.
Our election system is already tilted against working Americans. The rich can spend unlimited sums to buy political influence while the poor face multiple barriers to exercising even their most basic democratic right. As a result, candidate platforms too often reflect the interests of those at the top, further discouraging working people from participating.
Instead of restricting mail-in voting, we should expand access to this method of participation in every state, as part of broader electoral reforms. Making the right to vote by mail universal wouldn’t fix every problem in our lopsided political system, but it would be one important step towards a stronger democracy for all.
—
Previously Published on otherwords.org with Creative Commons License
***
At The Good Men Project, we are proud to syndicate work from OtherWords, a public-interest editorial service published by the Institute for Policy Studies. We value their work because it brings readers clear, accessible, fact-checked commentary on the policies and power structures shaping everyday life, often from voices and perspectives that do not get nearly enough mainstream attention.
We believe these conversations belong here because questions about democracy, inequality, justice, rights, and public responsibility are not separate from the human story. They shape how families live, how communities function, who gets heard, who gets protected, and what kinds of values a culture rewards. Many of the issues OtherWords covers also overlap with questions we care deeply about at GMP: power, identity, belonging, care, fairness, and how to build a society that is more humane than the one we inherited. That is one reason we are glad to share their work with our readers.
There are many ways to support The Good Men Project’s mission. You can join us on Substack, become a Premium Member, and follow our broader conversations about identity, relationships, culture, justice, and how to live well and responsibly in a rapidly changing world. We also work with authors, agencies, brands, and sponsors through our author amplification and paid guest post programs. For more information, email [email protected].
Join The Good Men Project as a Premium Member today.
All Premium Members get to view The Good Men Project with NO ADS. Need more info? A complete list of benefits is here.
—
Photo credit: unsplash
