The Opposite of “Man” is “Boy,” Not “Woman”

Masculinity is a performance, Hugo Schwyzer writes, in which men differentiate themselves from boys.

Earlier this month, my column focused on modern-day “chivalry” and how men and women can negotiate gender-based courtesy in their romantic lives. In the piece, I pointed out something that feminists (starting with the hugely influential Judith Butler) have argued for years: gender is not what we “are” as much as it is something we “perform.”  The give-away is the term “roles” that we use to describe what’s appropriate for men and women; in its most common usage, a role is a part played by an actor. And when it comes to gender, most of us—whether we’re conscious of it or not—are acting.

♦◊♦

Another helpful way to think about performance is to think about the distinction between the words “male” and “man.”  The former is a biological term that applies to other species as well as our own. We are born male; unless we undergo sex-reassignment surgery, we don’t acquire maleness through a process. It is who we are.

A “man,” however, is something we’re expected to become through a process. And that process is more than biological. Drill sergeants and football coaches have long promised to make boys into men through the alchemy of discipline and danger and pain. It’s common to describe the loss of virginity as something that makes a boy a man. (Though the act of sex with a woman isn’t what does it—what makes a guy a “man” is when his buddies find out.) Manhood can also be lost even after it’s been gained; think of the unfortunate and un-ironic obsession so many twenty-something guys have with “Man Law Violations.”

It is other men who pressure us to perform “manhood” through feats of bravery, loyalty, and recklessness. The title “man” is something they can bestow—and just as quickly take away. We learn early what we can do to make us “men” in the eyes of our peers, and most of us learn early to avoid performing those things that will earn us ridicule. (It’s telling that the most hurtful way to put down a guy is, invariably, to imply that he is somehow feminized.)

But it would be unfair to suggest that there’s nothing more to performing manliness than playing the part of a high school sports hero or a drunken frat boy. Some of the ways that men act in order to feel more masculine are destructive (binge drinking, brawling, driving too fast, and other risk-taking behaviors); others are harmless, and still others are profoundly positive.

Part of the problem, however, with this notion of performing masculinity is the mistaken idea that in order for something to be genuinely manly it must be something women don’t do. And as women have been successful in moving into once all-male bastions, some men have felt the pressure to go to ever more violent and more extreme lengths to “play at manhood.” Within living memory, only men went into combat; within living memory, contact sports for women were non-existent. A man who went to war or played hockey was made more masculine by the role he took as a soldier or a forward. In a world where women go to war—and play hockey—men who believe that true manliness lies in doing what women can’t are forced to create ever more-violent activities from which females can still be excluded. (This explains the rising popularity of the most violent video games, as well as MMA.)

♦◊♦

But men who long for a vanished world of all-male preserves are making a fundamental mistake about masculinity. They think that the opposite of “man” is “woman” and that in order to prove oneself the former they must do (perform) things that no woman can. But it makes good sense to suggest that the better antonym of “man” is “boy.”  To “perform masculinity” isn’t about doing what women don’t. It’s about doing what boys lack the will or the maturity to do.

So often, when someone makes a list of manly virtues (like courage, forthrightness, dependability, persistence), someone else rightly points out that women can also display all of these. That leaves many men floundering, wondering (as many writers here at The Good Men Project have wondered) what, if anything is uniquely good about masculinity? But the point is that performing manhood isn’t about differentiating oneself from what is female; after all, that’s a biological distinction that’s already in place. Rather, performing manhood is about deliberately choosing to do those things that are fundamentally adult rather than puerile.

But the point is that performing manhood isn’t about differentiating oneself from what is female; after all, that’s a biological distinction that’s already in place. Rather, performing manhood is about deliberately choosing to do those things that are fundamentally adult rather than puerile.

So when I choose to confront publicly a senior administrator at my college, the modest courage I display is about taking responsibility. It’s something a woman could do just as well, but when I do it (I’ve had occasion to do just this a few times in recent years), I feel like a man. Not in the sense that I feel infused with macho bravado, but in the sense that I feel as if I’ve done something that I couldn’t have done in my younger, more self-conscious years. And it feels good.

So is “performing manhood” just about being a responsible adult in a male body? Partly, yes. But there are other ways to do it as well.

♦◊♦

For example, clothing.

I live in hip West Los Angeles, where middle-aged fathers famously dress like teenage boys. I’m casual myself on the weekends and vacations, but when I go to teach or to an important meeting, I usually break out a Brooks Brothers suit or blazer. Growing up in my family, business attire from that famous flagship of preppiness was what symbolized adult masculinity. And while I’d like to think I’m a responsible adult whatever I’m wearing, I always feel more grown-up—and yes, more like a man—when I put on something just a bit more formal.

If we really are in a “man crisis” in America, I suspect it’s rooted as much as anything else in this fundamentally mistaken belief that manhood needs to be about rejecting anything that smacks of the feminine. With fewer and fewer all-male preserves left in our society, guys who cling to this outdated notion of what it means to perform masculinity will indeed feel themselves at a loss. But if we understand masculinity as something we choose to perform—and grasp that at its core, that performance is about distinguishing ourselves from immature boys rather than women—we can still find something pleasurable, meaningful, and redemptive in acting like “real men.”

♦◊♦

Lisa Hickey responds to this post:

If Gender Is a Performance, I’ll Take the Part of the Female, Please

 

Photo JD Hancock/Flickr

Premium Membership, The Good Men Project

Sponsored Content
About Hugo Schwyzer

Hugo Schwyzer has taught history and gender studies at Pasadena City College since 1993, where he developed the college's first courses on Men and Masculinity and Beauty and Body Image. He serves as co-director of the Perfectly Unperfected Project, a campaign to transform young people's attitudes around body image and fashion. Hugo lives with his wife, daughter, and six chinchillas in Los Angeles. Hugo blogs at his website

Comments

  1. Thanks so much for writing this article. In researching modern men and their angst, it is again the fear of women (or turning into women) that continually highlights the conversation. It is a pretty old conversation. Men in our western culture, with the rare exception of things like Bar Mitzvahs for Jewish boys, do not have an entry into the cult of Manhood and thus there is a continually desire to seek more and dangerous and sometimes painful behavior to achieve that entry from peers. Other aspects of being a Man, in my opinion are being able to hold down a job and be self-sufficient, being loyal to a partner, being an attentive, present father, taking care of your health and vitality. When you are a boy, it is all too easy to rest of the elasticity of youth. As we mature, we see that there are repercussions to all of our decisions. A true man makes decisions that seek to better his life, rather than to harm it.

  2. the oppisite of women is little girl its never told what is needed to be a women for being a man its such a long list but for being a women its very short

  3. Jimmy Sorrentino says:

    This is a very good article. I appreciate the ideas it presents, and I feel as though it helps put words to feelings I’ve had in the past that I could not verbalize myself. I did take offense to one point however. That point was that the rise in popularity of MMA is in response to males seeking a new, more violent arena to demonstrate perceived masculine behaviors that excludes women. As an MMA fighter, and ardent feminist myself, I feel this is a vague generalization. First of all, there are women MMA fighters. Gina Carano, Miesha Tate, Christiane Santos, and Marloes Coenen are all superior athletes with tremendous skill sets. True, professional female MMA is still in its infancy, but the same could be said for the male fighters, as it’s only been within the past ten years that it’s taken off.

    A second point in the same vein is that two of my coaches, strength/conditioning and boxing, are both female. Dare I even say that they are women? After all, they are genetically female but still demonstrate many of the qualities we associate with being a woman. The rule at my gym is “leave your ego at the door”. Every student, male and female, trains as equals under coaches of both sexes. When we compete, we have our male and female coaches in our corner. I’ve seen female newcomers to my gym think it is unfair to have to train with males because in their minds they have been programmed to think they are unable to beat a man in a physical contest. I’ve also seen male newcomers think they are walking into some sort of boy’s club, only to have their egos shattered when they spar with our more experienced female fighters. You lose a lot of primitive notions about comparing what men and women can or can not accomplish when you are in an environment such as this.

    There are a large number of female MMA fans as well as male fans and the numbers for both continue to grow. I do not think that it is due, not entirely anyway, to notions that it is the pinnacle of danger and “manliness”, or for the exclusion of women, that makes MMA popular. It is an exciting sport that requires top notch training in a wide variety of martial practices, excellent strength, flexibility, conditioning, and mental toughness. MMA fighters, male and female, are the most elite athletes, top to bottom, on the planet. That is why I train, that is why I fight, and that is why anyone who actually understands the sport watches it.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] I first heard the words “gender is a performance,” in a post by Hugo Schwyzer, I felt like someone had finally given me the secret little instruction manual [...]

  2. [...] My column at GMP this week: The Opposite of Man is Boy, Not Woman. [...]

  3. [...] The Opposite of “Man” is “Boy,” Not “Woman” by Hugo Schwyzer, The Good Men Project. Schwyzer reflects on the performative elements that constitute “manliness,” and whether or not more positive forms of manhood and masculinity can be discovered. But men who long for a vanished world of all-male preserves are making a fundamental mistake about masculinity. They think that the opposite of “man” is “woman” and that in order to prove oneself the former they must do (perform) things that no woman can. But it makes good sense to suggest that the better antonym of “man” is “boy.”  To “perform masculinity” isn’t about doing what women don’t. It’s about doing what boys lack the will or the maturity to do. [...]

  4. [...] recommend: The Opposite of “Man” is “Boy”, not “Woman”. Share this:Like this:LikeBe the first to like this post. This entry was posted in Thinking [...]

  5. [...] The opposite of “Man” is “Boy,” Not “Wom… by Hugo Schwyzer, The Good Men Project. Schwyzer reflects on the performative elements that constitute “manliness,” and whether or not more positive forms of manhood and masculinity can be discovered. [...]

  6. [...] day after I read that list, I read Hugo Schwyzer’s Good Men Project column on gender as performance in which he writes, “[M]en who long for a vanished world of all-male [...]

  7. [...] day after I read that list, I read Hugo Schwyzer’s Good Men Project column on gender as performance in which he writes, “[M]en who long for a vanished world of [...]

  8. [...] “The Opposite of ‘Man’ is ‘Boy’, Not ‘Woman’” by Hugo Schwyzer: [...]

  9. [...] day after I read that list, I read Hugo Schwyzer’s Good Men Projectcolumn on gender as performance in which he writes, “[M]en who long for a vanished world of all-male [...]

  10. [...] of Young Girls Spring is No Excuse for Sexual Harassment The Male Body: Repulsive or Beautiful? The Opposite of “Man” is “Boy,” Not “Woman” Short Skirts Magically Turn Women into Bitches What’s the Difference Between Privacy and [...]

  11. [...] by the article called, The Opposite of ‘Man’ is ‘Boy,’ Not ‘Woman,’ by Hugo Schwayer, published in Jezebel and The Good Men [...]

Speak Your Mind

*