For 25 years, the American right wing has been pursuing a strategy designed to increase their political power, and it’s cost them their principles and basic competence.
—-
The present government shutdown is an embarrassment; a failure of basic governmental competence that would be unimaginable in any other developed nation. Nowhere in any other democracy on earth could denying the fundamental, routine responsibilities of government be considered as a serious proposal, much less employed as a “hostage-taking” measure in an attempt to overturn settled and constitutionally-valid law.
The responsibility for this trainwreck lies wholly with a portion of Republican party, the hard-right Tea Party caucus, and its evident belief that it is the only source of political legitimacy. It takes a special kind of blind arrogance to believe that a law that’s been passed, signed, supported as an electoral issue, and upheld by the Supreme Court is nonetheless somehow not legitimate.
Unfortunately, the Tea Partiers have exactly that kind of arrogance. Comparing themselves to everything from the civil rights movement to the Union army in the Civil War, they have clearly taken the position that those who oppose them should not be considered a legitimate part of government. For proof of this, one need look no further than the ridiculous list of demands they issued in exchange for the basic, necessary act of raising the debt ceiling. The only way the American government can function, they are saying, is by enacting their entire agenda. No other agenda can be considered legitimate.
How did things come to this pass? How, in the most powerful democracy in the world, can our government be held hostage by a radical group that rejects the very concept of democracy? How can a constitutional republic with a tripartite government be crippled by a minority that doesn’t believe in checks, balances, or separation of powers?
The answer is that we’re witnessing the backfiring of a quarter-century plan by the American right, a plan that has paid immense political dividends for the Republican party, at the cost of their principles and ability to govern.
♦◊♦
Today’s right wing stands for nothing. Their position has been usefully defined as “The opposite of what liberals want today, updated daily.” This is easily tested: their own legislators will demonstrably oppose their own positions if the alternative is agreeing with a Democrat. The reactions of right-wingers to events bear this out even more obviously. When liberals began pushing anti-bullying campaigns, the right suddenly discovered they were pro-bullying.
Today’s right wing stands for nothing. Their position has been usefully defined as “The opposite of what liberals want today, updated daily.”
|
When liberals decried the murder of Trayvon Martin, the right immediately shot past “Maybe we should hear out the facts” and straight to “Trayvon deserved to die.” If President Obama were to come out against self-immolation, right-wingers coast to coast would burst into flames.
It’s this blunt, reactionary non-position that defines the modern right, and has given rise to the current crisis. And the ground for it was laid in 1987.
That was the year that the FCC repealed the “Fairness Doctrine“, the rule that, since 1949, had required broadcasters using the public airwaves to present even-handed coverage regarding controversial issues of public interest. By the late Reagan administration, though, the concepts of public interest and public property were considered unfashionable, and the doctrine was repealed. Broadcasting on controversial issues now belonged to whoever could buy the biggest microphone. Unsurprisingly, the resultant wave of one-sided programming favored the interests of rich corporations.
The rise of right-wing radio created the new identity politics that has dominated the past two decades, starting with the “angry white male” vote of the 1994 elections. It’s a right-wing identity that is based on the knee-jerk opposition described above. It’s not even conservative so much as “not-liberal”, and it’s become the core identity of a certain irreducible percentage of the nation.
Now, decades later, we’ve seen the peddling of paranoid, reactionary fables grow into a vast industry with its own news network, and even moderate conservatives can only shake their heads at how detached from reality this media bubble has made its enthusiasts.
♦◊♦
I was in high school when I saw the beginnings of the collapse of the Republican party into its present status as a national disaster. It had started in 1987, but the effects didn’t start to become visible right away, and I didn’t start paying attention to politics until my teen years.
I saw the young Republicans in my high school, the guys writing papers titled “In Defense of Racism” and saying that the most important thing in life was money, talking about their new guru, a radio demagogue named Rush Limbaugh. Curious, I gave the guy a listen and read his first book. What I saw was a political philosophy defined entirely in the negative. Limbaugh, and the vast army of his imitators, didn’t actually rail in favor of anything; merely against “liberals”.
They’ll exaggerate, manufacture, and if necessary just plain make up new enemies to be outraged at.
|
The basis of Limbaugh’s appeal, and that of the entire mediasphere feeding the same audience as Limbaugh, is moral outrage. Offense and anger are literally all it’s based on, and they’ll exaggerate, manufacture, and if necessary just plain make up new enemies to be outraged at. I realized even then that this was no basis for a coherent political stance, and wondered what would become of the people growing up in the alternate universe they were creating.
Today, we’re seeing what’s become of them. They’re serving in the most incompetent Congress in the history of our country.
Ted Cruz was 16 years old in 1987. He’d have been in college during the rise of the right-wing talkers, and has spent his entire adult life within the alternate reality of right-wing radio, Fox News, and the ubiquitous email forwards that vary from urban myths to outright cons. He’s been allowed to exist within a universe of false information that has been telling him consistently that only his views are legitimate, that anything other than the farthest-right position is treasonous, unpatriotic, and wrong.
And now he and his cohorts are attempting to govern as though all that is true. Their self-justifying fantasy, fed on manufactured outrage against imaginary enemies, has plowed into the reality of actual governance, and been found completely incompatible.
♦◊♦
Sadly, the same forces that have let them come to power mean that these dangerously irresponsible legislators are unlikely to pay an electoral price for their actions. Not only have years of gerrymandering and voter suppression, designed carefully to protect Republican seats, helped make many of them election-proof, but the same media stream that’s led to their election has also created a subset of voters who cannot imagine voting for anyone but a Republican. These voters will never connect their representatives’ actions to any real-world consequences, living as they do in a bubble where anything bad that happens is the Democrats’ fault almost by definition.
Indeed, one of the major electoral threats faced by Republican politicians is being faced with a primary challenge from a further-right Republican. In many cases, longstanding Republicans have been ousted by right-wing extremists in direct retaliation for perceived disloyalty to the hard-right agenda. Such disloyalty usually takes the form of compromise, passing legislation, confirming candidates, and otherwise actually doing their job as legislators.
This, then, is the state of play. We are split into two Americas not along socioeconomic lines, but along parallel realities. A certain percentage of the electorate has seceded from consensus reality, preferring to inhabit a world they find more morally comforting than the truth. Once set up in this reality, they have begun sending representatives to Washington, people whose affiliation might as well be listed as R – (Fantasyland).
I agree with some of the criticism on this article, but disagree on the wording. The large sentiment is that the Republicans aren’t losers; they somehow managed to retain control of the House while losing significant popular support. If that’s not a hallmark of winning at politics, I don’t know what is. So to call them “incompetent” is inaccurate, but only by point of view, like if you were to look at an arrow in a haystack from an angle and see a bullseye when it’s really on the outer ring. It’s still on target. The thing is, I think… Read more »
Angel, I don’t think anyone could have explained it better
Tom So much of the gloating and fingerpointing coming from progressives is base politicing at its worst.The political echochamber from whence much of this critcism of conservatives resonates is selfserving and regressive,creating a false sense of worth among progressives. Progressives are not better people than conservatives and they need to give up that line of criticism.Again,aren’t men tired of hearing that women are better than them.Men are tired of the women are more evolved trope because its not true and encourages division.Why do the same thing to someone else?
Noah:Tom is my dude and he has some good points.Seldom does GMP hold progressive groups accountable to the same standards of moral and ideological consistency as they do conservatives. This tone is seen in mainstream liberal media as well.The narrative says,We-liberals(true liberals are rarer than track shoes on a pig) -are more evolved than conservatives.This is a seductive,powerful message that exposes dark qualities common to all humans.A want to gloat,wield power over others,exact revenge,elevate one’s social status by limiting the status of others and to have control.So often we imagine that our political selves reflect our true personal morality and… Read more »
Referring to the most powerful Republicans as “incompetent” is not really accurate. I would argue quite the opposite. They’ve accomplished what they set out to do, their careers are really taking off, and they will no doubt emerge from all this even better off than they were before. In terms of setting goals and achieving them, they have been more than competent. They set themselves a job and despite some big numbers stacked against them, despite all sorts of logic and evidence stacked against them, they did the task they gave themselves. They have made names for themselves and have… Read more »
Liked the article- harsh; but a very fair assessment of the last 25 years.
Absolutely dead on and perfectly written sir!
I had no idea that The Good Men Project was politically affiliated. I’m somewhat saddened to see this article here. I expect to find articles related to the raising of my son, but instead find this here today. I hope that you guys have good enough sense to give equal time to “the other side.” Otherwise, I may have to assume that you are trying to push a political agenda on me. In your “About” section, it says nowhere that you are associated with the Democratic Party. I ask you to give equal time to the Republicans on this matter.… Read more »
Great article as a whole, but I just wanted to point out that by the rest of the world’s standards the democrats are a right wing party. They are just a center right wing party. The word liberal is also different by the rest of the world’s standards, normally referring to classical liberalism. I would agree that the media is partially to blame; I’d love to see the Fairness Doctrine reinstated, although I’m not sure that would be enough. The media still left out a lot of important information about foreign affairs even when the doctrine was in place, America… Read more »
Well, Sadly this is the end of the road for me. Perhaps GMP can build a monument to the Democrats and on it, you can list the hundreds the thousands that are either no longer in the job market or have simply settled for far less. List the men and women who have lost their homes, list the names of the food stamp recipients at record numbers. It appears that the democrats can do no wrong and that’s cool but unfortunately for many of us things haven’t turned around and in many cases have only got worse but that has… Read more »
I’m pretty sure Noah said nothing along the lines of “the Democrats can do no wrong.” He’s just pointing out the bigotry and illegitimacy of the GOP in today’s political circle. You’d be hard-pressed to find evidence of many Republicans backing same-sex marriages, government spending, and anything that the Democrats tend to recommend (which is not always fool-proof, though nothing is fool-proof in terms of economics and politics: you will always have some problems with whatever you do). If you’re going to leave GMP because they don’t fit in to what YOU believe, then I’m stumped on how you even… Read more »
some of these moral issues*
The sad thing is this. Tom- if he’s the Tom I am thinking about, does more to help men directly than pretty much anyone else I’ve read on here. He can tell you about the young men he’s working with, their lives and what he’s trying to accomplish with each of em. He’s the very definition of a GOOD person- a dedicated Dad and Husband in addition to all his community service. However- he’s also a conservative Roman Catholic- these characteristics are consistently demonized.
If I’ve got the wrong Tom I apologize.
CW, I’m humbled by your response and thank you. I don’t do what I do for accolades but it feels good that some recognize my efforts. Thank you again.
MORALITY CAN BE OPIUM….,AND ,DENIAL CAN BE EXISTENTIALISM……………?
Great article, Noah. Any critical examination of the GOP shows they are really just about funneling money upward to the top 1%. Seen through this lens, their actions make a lot more sense. Strangle entitlements and purge regulations. All for the 1%. This is by necessity a short term strategy as the persons who sponsor this money funneling effort just want the fucking money. Today, if possible. And to hell with everybody else, including, in fact, the Republican Party.
It could just as easily be argued that the Democrat party’s main goal is to protect their base of government employees and other beneficiaries of government programs. “And to hell with everyone else”.
This current crisis is mostly about maintaining the size of government and current spending levels come hell or high water.
Just to add, if you really care about the Republican party, you’d vote in the next Republican primary, or get active in the Republican organization..
From the late ’50s up until 1994, Congressional Republicans were exactly the reasonable, get-along-go-along guys that you’d like them to be. And what did it get them? Permanent minority status and complicity in the unchecked growth of an administrative state to which they claimed to be philosophically opposed. You don’t really want the Republicans to stand for any principle, you want them to go along with what you want. you’d like the Republicans to go back to being the good-natured, ‘reasonable’ losers that they were in the ’50s, ’60s and ’70s. you don’t really want ‘compromise’, you want the Republicans… Read more »
On all sides of the political spectrum, idealism tends to be highly selective. The Republicans haven’t shut down ALL parts of the federal government. They’ve managed to keep some things open in order to please some of their constituents and in order to help their image. For example: not ALL of the national parks and monuments are closed. The GOP made sure to keep the WWII Memorial open, because it’s still The Good War. (Ironic, considering that it was gigantic government spending that won that war….) No one wants to be accused of picking on WWII veterans. In any event,… Read more »
“Many of the most powerful Republicans in Congress are doing exactly what most of their constituents want them to do.” Oh I would agree that there are some people out there who want shutdowns and such but there are plenty of non-crazy conservatives as well. According to most of the reporting I’ve read, and this includes media outlets aligned with the GOP, there are probably only about 30-60 (at most 80) Republican members of Congress who actually wanted this shut down. The majority of Republican members didn’t want to do this, but didn’t have the guts to stand up to… Read more »
Spot on, Noah. As always.
“If President Obama were to come out against self-immolation, right-wingers coast to coast would burst into flames.”
Promise? 😉
“A certain percentage of the electorate has seceded from consensus reality, preferring to inhabit a world they find more morally comforting than the truth.”
Forget fluoride, maybe it’s time to put Prozac in the water supply.