The Quietest Lie

Hypocrisy bothers me more than most faults because I recognize it too easily. I see it in other people and judge it quickly. Then I find ways to excuse the same thing in myself. The gap between what I say and what I do is rarely dramatic. Most of the time it is small enough to explain away.

I say I value honesty. That is true, up to the point where honesty threatens the version of myself I want to keep. Then I start editing. I choose the kinder word, leave out the uglier motive, tell myself timing matters. Sometimes it does. Sometimes I am simply protecting myself from being seen too clearly.

Vanity works the same way. I dislike obvious hunger for attention, but I know what it feels like to check whether something I wrote was noticed, praised, or shared. I can spend an hour polishing a sentence and tell myself I am serving the sentence. Some part of me is also imagining the reader admiring it. I do not think that makes the work false. It does make my contempt for vanity less clean than I would like it to be.

Love has exposed this more brutally than anything else.

I have said “I love you” while wondering whether I still meant it. I have expected loyalty while allowing myself thoughts and impulses I would have condemned in the other person. I wanted to be chosen even when I was unsure I could make the same promise in return. When the contradiction became impossible to hide, I leaned on intention. I did not mean to hurt you. The sentence was true and still inadequate. Consequence does not disappear because the harm was not planned.

None of this belongs only to private life. We do similar things together. A company can publish statements about justice while depending on labor practices it would rather not describe in detail. A person can speak about fairness and then bargain down someone whose desperation makes refusal difficult. People complain about corruption and then celebrate the fixer who makes a problem disappear. The contradiction survives because we usually judge our own compromises by circumstance and other people’s by principle.

The ordinary cases interest me more than the theatrical ones. The small bribe. The favor called in. The truth left unsaid because saying it would cost a job, a friendship, or a place in the family. Often there is a real cost. That is what makes easy moral language useless. People do not always compromise because they are weak. Sometimes they are protecting something they cannot afford to lose. But necessity is a generous word. We can hide a great deal inside it.

Can a person live without hypocrisy? I doubt it. Human beings change faster than their promises do. Values collide. Circumstances punish consistency. A politician who kept every promise regardless of new facts would be reckless. A lover can mean a vow when it is made and fail it years later. A citizen can believe in justice and still be unable to carry the full personal cost of every conviction. Complete consistency sounds admirable until real life starts sending invoices.

That does not make hypocrisy harmless. Repeated long enough, self-explanation becomes self-deception. I can become very skilled at giving respectable names to motives I would recognize immediately in somebody else. Fear becomes prudence. Desire becomes principle. Cowardice becomes timing. At some point, the problem is no longer that I sometimes fail to live by what I believe. The problem is that I keep changing the description of what happened so I never have to admit the failure plainly.

The quietest lie may be the one I tell myself about time. I assume the distance between who I am and who I claim to be is temporary, as if age will eventually close the gap without requiring much from me. Maybe that belief is useful. It gives a person room to change. It can also become a permanent excuse, a future version of myself repeatedly assigned the work I keep postponing.

I do not think the answer is purity. I do not trust people who seem too certain of their own consistency, and I have no interest in pretending I can remove contradiction from myself. I would rather become harder to fool from the inside. That means asking what I gained from a compromise, what I was afraid of losing, and whether I would accept the same explanation from someone else.

There will still be gaps between what I believe and what I do. Some may be unavoidable. What matters is whether I can see them before I turn them into a story that makes me innocent. If I can keep looking at the contradiction without immediately improving the description, then at least I know what I am dealing with. I suspect that is as close to honesty as I can get without turning honesty itself into another performance.

—

This Post is republished on Medium.

—

Photo credit: iStock