I have a theory.
Modern dating is not a romance problem. It is a cowardice problem.
Not the dramatic kind of cowardice. Not people fleeing burning buildings or abandoning ships. Nothing so cinematic. I mean the quieter variety. The kind that wears expensive perfume and says, “I’m just seeing where things go.” The kind that reads your message, feels something tender rise in its throat, and decides never to reply again.
I know because I have been both victim and accomplice.
I have wanted intimacy with the desperation of a starving woman standing outside a bakery, pressing her face against the glass. And I have also treated vulnerability like an armed intruder. The second it arrived, I reached for the nearest weapon.
Humor.
Detachment.
Intellectualization.
Anything but the terrifying possibility of being known.
This is what nobody tells you about modern dating: everyone is hungry, but everyone is pretending they already ate.
I keep meeting people who speak about connection the way medieval sailors spoke about sea monsters. They believe it exists. They are fascinated by it. But God forbid they encounter it in real life.
Everybody wants closeness.
Nobody wants to be caught wanting it.
The performance is exhausting.
You can feel it everywhere.
In the carefully delayed text message.
In the strategic withholding.
In the casualness that feels rehearsed.
In the way people say “chill” when they actually mean terrified.
Especially terrified.
I once sat across from someone I liked and realized we were performing the same ritual. Two intelligent adults. Two functioning nervous systems. Two people attempting to communicate affection while pretending affection was the last thing on earth either of us wanted.
The conversation felt less like flirting and more like hostage negotiation.
I left wondering whether attraction had become a bureaucratic process.
Submit application.
Wait six to eight business weeks.
Receive emotional ambiguity.
I blame nobody entirely.
We are products of an era obsessed with self-protection.
We have inherited enough heartbreak stories to build national monuments. We have watched relationships implode in public. We have consumed endless content warning us about narcissists, manipulators, avoidants, gaslighters, love bombers, future fakers, emotional vampires, and whatever fresh demon the internet discovers next Tuesday.
Everybody has become fluent in danger.
Nobody remembers how to recognize safety.
The result is fascinating.
We treat vulnerability as if it were more dangerous than loneliness.
Which is absurd.
Because loneliness is killing people in real time.
I know women who haven’t cried in front of a partner in years.
I know men who would rather disappear entirely than admit they miss someone.
I know people who can discuss childhood trauma, politics, religion, and generational dysfunction, yet become visibly unwell when asked a simple question:
“So what are you looking for?”
Suddenly everyone develops the emotional range of a decorative lamp.
The irony is almost funny.
Almost.
Because underneath all this emotional theater is something profoundly sad.
People are lonely.
Not alone.
Lonely.
Those are different conditions.
You can be surrounded by attention and still starve.
You can have ten conversations happening on your phone and still feel untouched.
Modern dating offers infinite access and very little arrival.
Everyone is available.
Nobody is present.
The invention of ghosting feels particularly revealing.
I remain fascinated by it.
Imagine liking someone enough to speak to them every day, learn their stories, memorize their habits, absorb their attention, enjoy their company — and then one morning simply evaporating.
Not leaving.
Not ending.
Evaporating.
As if human beings are browser tabs.
Close window.
Delete history.
Move on.
What interests me isn’t even the disappearance itself.
It’s the philosophy behind it.
Ghosting assumes silence is easier than honesty.
That confusion is kinder than rejection.
That uncertainty hurts less than truth.
But uncertainty is its own form of violence.
It colonizes the imagination.
The mind begins manufacturing explanations because the other person refused to provide one.
And the mind is rarely generous.
Especially when wounded.
I think that’s why ghosting feels so uniquely cruel.
A breakup closes a door.
Ghosting removes the walls entirely.
You stand there holding memories and questions, staring into empty space where reality used to be.
The older I get, the more I suspect emotional avoidance has become a cultural aesthetic.
Detachment is sexy.
Availability is suspicious.
Sincerity is embarrassing.
Everyone wants someone emotionally intelligent until that intelligence starts expressing actual emotions.
Then suddenly we’re “moving too fast.”
I find this hilarious.
And tragic.
Mostly tragic.
We have somehow convinced ourselves that caring less is evidence of power.
Meanwhile the people who care deeply are treated like they committed a social crime.
Imagine applying this logic anywhere else.
Nobody boasts about being detached from art.
Nobody brags about being emotionally unavailable to food.
Nobody says, “I listened to half the symphony and left before the ending because I didn’t want to seem invested.”
Yet in dating, investment has become embarrassing.
As though desire itself lowers your market value.
As though wanting another person somehow diminishes you.
I reject this entirely.
Wanting is one of the most intelligent things the body does.
The body recognizes before the ego permits.
The body knows.
It knows when someone’s laugh begins rearranging the furniture in your chest.
It knows when a conversation lasts too long and still feels unfinished.
It knows when someone’s absence becomes a physical sensation.
The body notices everything.
The tragedy is that modern dating often asks us to ignore that intelligence.
To mute instinct.
To suppress tenderness.
To remain cool.
I am tired of cool.
Cool has never held me at night.
Cool has never built intimacy.
Cool has never transformed two strangers into something sacred.
The most beautiful moments of my life have all involved somebody risking embarrassment.
Somebody saying the thing.
Somebody admitting the feeling.
Somebody choosing honesty over strategy.
That is the real rebellion now.
Not casual sex.
Not situationships.
Not emotional detachment.
Vulnerability.
The radical act of looking another human being in the eye and saying:
I like you.
I miss you.
I want more.
I am afraid.
Stay.
Perhaps modern dating feels broken because everyone is carrying armor into places where they secretly hope to be touched.
And armor is excellent for surviving wars.
Terrible for making love.
I know.
I wore mine for years.
Then one day I realized the walls protecting my heart were also preventing anybody from reaching it.
A devastating discovery.
An expensive one.
But necessary.
Because eventually every fortress becomes a prison.
And some of us are lonely not because nobody loves us.
But because we’ve become experts at making love impossible to enter.
—
This post was previously published on medium.com.
Love relationships? We promise to have a good one with your inbox.
Subcribe to get 3x weekly dating and relationship advice.
Did you know? We have 8 publications on Medium. Join us there!
***
–
Photo credit: Markus Winkler on Unsplash
