—
Commercial venues across places like Canggu are now selling a social function that neighbourhoods once supplied for free. Coworking spaces frame community as their defining offering. Wellness clubs engineer repeated encounters between members who’ve barely met. The theoretical lens for understanding what they’re reaching for belongs to sociologist Ray Oldenburg, who in 1989 identified the “third place” – the informal social ground between home and work where community actually forms – by studying pubs, barbershops, and coffee houses. That framework was built on freely accessible, unscheduled neighbourhood anchors, and applying it to paid membership venues is not a minor adaptation. It inverts the very conditions Oldenburg argued were essential.
Remote work has not merely relocated work – it has dismantled the daily rhythms that once produced social infrastructure as a by-product. A Nature Computational Science study (2022) found substantial weak-tie loss associated with reduced co-location in a large communication network. Microsoft Research findings report that collaboration became more siloed and less interconnected under remote work in the studied setting. In destinations like Canggu, where location-independent workers arrive on short, rotating stays, that weak-tie erosion shows up as a felt vacancy in everyday life. The structural question is whether commercial venues can reproduce what Oldenburg described, or whether the conditions he identified are simply too different from anything a membership model can replicate.
A Concentrated Vacancy
Canggu makes this vacancy concrete. Academic research on its tourism development describes the area’s evolution into a digital-nomad hub. A survey of 520 digital nomads in Bali conducted between May 2022 and August 2023 (Morrison, 2024, University of Greenwich) found Canggu as a major base location – 112 respondents (21.54%) – while the majority of stays lasted only one to four weeks (302 respondents; 58.08%). In Oldenburg’s terms, what disappears under that turnover rate is not productivity or entertainment infrastructure, but the low-stakes, repeated proximity that produces belonging without anyone having to plan it.
The demand for a substitute registers clearly on the supply side. BWork Bali, a coworking space and café in Canggu, explicitly frames community as the core perk beyond its physical workspace – a positioning that would be redundant if the neighbourhood already delivered it. Steve Munroe, co-founder of Hubud coworking space in nearby Ubud, Bali, described the structural reality plainly in a 2019 interview: “We don’t have offices or permanent positions, all the space is made of flex positions, the space is a very fluid, transient environment. Depending on when you go in you will never be sure who you will find.” Oldenburg’s conditions depended on incidental proximity accumulating over time – contact no one had to design or pay for – and that accumulation is precisely what Canggu’s rotating population cannot reliably generate.
The Gap Between Oldenburg’s Model and Commercial Reality
Oldenburg’s third-place model rests on a specific set of characteristics. Peer-reviewed work summarising that framework (SAGE, 2016) explicitly includes “accessibility and accommodation” and “the regulars” among its core features – the idea that a third place is easy to enter and that familiar, returning faces provide its social continuity. In a nomad-dense destination, a commercial venue comes under structural pressure on both counts. Entry costs at commercial wellness venues in Canggu create a real barrier to casual belonging that Oldenburg’s neighbourhood anchors never imposed. And when membership populations rotate on nomad timescales rather than neighbourhood timescales, the “regulars” dynamic Oldenburg treats as foundational becomes harder to sustain predictably.
This is not a failure of execution – it is a feature of the market. The question it raises is whether deliberate mechanism design can substitute for the organic conditions that made traditional third places work, or whether the structural limits are simply non-negotiable. Venues in this market face a dual requirement. They need to lower the social threshold enough that paid entry doesn’t exclude the casual belonging Oldenburg assumed was free. And they need to generate recurring contact within a population whose tenure is too short for familiarity to accumulate on its own.
Engineering Encounter Through Space and Staff Behaviour
A Bali hospitality study at Hotel Tjampuhan & Spa in Ubud, published in JAKADARA (University of Dhyana Pura, Bali), found that SERVQUAL service-quality dimensions – including empathy and responsiveness – were positively and significantly related to customer satisfaction across 135 respondents. In that context, frontline interpersonal behaviour is a measurable lever: make someone feel recognised, and they’re more likely to return.
When a venue cannot guarantee recurring regulars, it can arrange space so that members cross paths across multiple contexts rather than only within scheduled sessions. Nirvana Life Bali, a wellness club in Canggu, places its class spaces, recovery spa, pool, and café and coworking areas in deliberate adjacency – a layout that generates the incidental, cross-context contact that neighbourhood embeddedness would otherwise produce over time. That adjacency is not amenity stacking – it is a structural substitute for the repeated low-stakes proximity that Oldenburg identified as third-place bedrock. Most fitness gyms are architecturally honest about their ambitions: in, train, leave. Nirvana Life Bali’s adjacency is designed specifically to produce those cross-path encounters. The operational layer extends the same logic: staff learn member names from the first visit – so a new member encounters recognition before they’ve had time to become a regular, rather than waiting for familiarity to build through repeated casual encounters. A gym and wellness membership structured this way functions less like a fitness access pass and more like a recurring social contract.
The output of those combined conditions is legible in how external reviewers describe Nirvana Life Bali. Across TripAdvisor and travel blogs, the recurring descriptors are warmth, familiarity, and the language of “second home” – responses that track closely to what Oldenburg expected a functioning third place to produce. The entry conditions are commercially unlike anything he described. The mechanism is documented; whether it scales or generalises beyond Nirvana Life Bali remains open.
Programming Belonging Into the Calendar
A University of Gadjah Mada thesis examining coworking-space development in Canggu between 2015 and 2019 lists “community” alongside location, affordability, and information technology as a factor in the sector’s growth. For operators in this market, that makes community a real competitive variable – one that requires producing rather than just announcing.
Because a coworking space’s default pattern produces no recurring committed contact on its own, a work-first venue has to manufacture repetition rather than wait for encounter to happen by chance. Bounded recurring programming becomes the available substitute. BWork Bali’s BWork Padel Club illustrates the mechanism: a member-only weekly padel game coordinated through a WhatsApp group, with mandatory RSVP. BWork Bali’s event page states the access terms directly: “For BWork members only. RSVP is mandatory through the WhatsApp group.” The gating is structurally significant – it creates an expectation of seeing the same faces each week. That expectation is the social contract that transient nomad tenure otherwise prevents from forming, and an approximation of Oldenburg’s “regulars” dynamic that a venue of this type can realistically produce.
Vitto Christaldi, Head of Learning & Experience at Hubud coworking space in Ubud, Bali, makes the calendar demands plain. His remarks come from a Nexudus Q&A in which he explained how Hubud sustains community when most members are transient digital nomads. “It is done by offering tours, new members orientation, and facilitated events. We organise more than 400 events annually, from daily skill share, think tanks, networking events, wellness activities, and excursions.” The volume of programming Christaldi describes reflects what transient coworking communities structurally require: belonging doesn’t emerge from shared Wi-Fi; it has to be scheduled. That same demand shows up at BWork Bali’s Canggu location, where a 2022 study in Jurnal Destinasi Pariwisata surveying 56 users found service quality rated highly across empathy, reliability, and responsiveness dimensions – a largely US-based, entrepreneurially oriented cohort. For that cohort, recurring structured programming substitutes for the social fabric their mobile careers have removed.
What Gets Built When You Design for It
Oldenburg’s third places required no design. They emerged from the ordinary texture of neighbourhood life – the same familiar faces kept appearing because the same routines brought them there, and no one had to engineer any of it. When that texture disappears, the social functions don’t simply migrate online. Academic work on digital nomad life in Bali notes that, for nomads in that scene, online community is treated as insufficient and in-person community as necessary – a pattern that holds even in a population described as being in continual influx and outflow.
That isn’t a blanket dismissal of digital social spaces. SAGE (2016) conceptualises some online gathering spaces as third-place-like using Oldenburg’s own framework – a reasonable point that keeps the claim honest. The more precise observation is that even when digital spaces approximate some third-place qualities, they don’t reliably reproduce the weak-tie ecology that forms when people keep crossing paths in the same physical circuit. Physical venues absorb some of that displaced demand – imperfectly, through engineered substitutes for conditions that no longer exist.
Those substitutes carry their own limitations. Commercial entry costs create a selection filter that the local café never imposed. Rotating membership populations mean whatever familiarity gets built must be rebuilt on shorter cycles. Both mechanisms operate within those constraints. Spatial adjacency and staff recognition at Nirvana Life Bali engineer familiarity on compressed timescales. Bounded recurring programming at BWork Bali creates an expectation of repeated contact that transient tenure alone would not produce. Oldenburg documented what emerged naturally in places nobody designed for belonging. What’s happening in Canggu is deliberate, commercially structured, and imperfect – but it’s addressing a vacancy that the original conditions no longer fill on their own. That’s not nothing.
—
