The Complicated Context Behind a Viral Marathon Finish

Over the weekend, I saw an unexpected marathon go viral: the 2026 Delaware Marathon. At the end of the marathon, the runner in second place is about 30 meters behind the runner in first place.

He is sprinting at full speed and with everything he has, while the first-place runner is first pumping and seems to be celebrating, seeming to think he has the race won.

About two seconds from the line, the first-place runner celebrating is passed, and the viral social media moment is a lesson to people everywhere: don’t celebrate until the finish. Don’t be arrogant and don’t get caught up in hubris.

Never take victory for granted until it’s over.

I chuckled when I saw this clip for the same reasons everyone else did.

How did the guy winning not know the other runner was right behind him when he was celebrating? Why did he celebrate when he heard people cheering behind him? Why would he celebrate before actually crossing the finish line?

For the record, I have never celebrated a race prior to crossing the finish line. I don’t do it because I’m scared someone will pass me. In fact, I never look back at the finish and will usually know someone is right behind me based on whether spectators are cheering for the other person. I never celebrate because I don’t want to lose valuable seconds off my finishing time.

I have also done this particular Delaware Marathon before. I have run a 2:34 marathon and these two guys ran it in 2:43, but my best time in this marathon is a 2:46. I did not have a great experience in this race. The first half is a trek through Wilmington, Delaware, which I enjoyed. However, the second half is an out-and-back on a boardwalk that isn’t blocked off to the public.

I think the reason I didn’t enjoy the full marathon is because it also got really hot during the race.

The previous year, when I was running the Delaware Half Marathon and in the lead for the first 10 miles, I was also led the wrong way several times. I know how much work and organizing it takes to run a marathon, so I won’t throw too much shade or foreclose ever doing this race again, but it’s just not the time of year I like to run marathons. It is also a bit smaller of a production compared to bigger regional races like the Richmond Marathon or the Philadelphia Marathon.

Regardless, watching this clip, I was dismayed a bit at some comments on X and Instagram that showed some schadenfreude at the guy who celebrated early. These comments essentially said he got what he deserved because of hubris and arrogance. Still surprised that this race I’ve done several times and that I don’t have a fond opinion of was going this viral, I wanted to look at the results and see.

First, both guys had run 2:43 in the marathon, which is around 6:13 mile pace. What is more impressive about the winner is that his chip time was two seconds faster than his finishing time.

For context, in road races, there is a gun time and a chip time. The gun time is the time you run relative to when the race starts. The chip time is the time you run when your bib actually crosses the start. For runners at the front, this is a negligible, one or two-second difference. But for runners who are starting further back, this chip time versus gun time disparity matters quite a bit for personal bests. The runner who won could have finished a second faster than the runner in second and still won based on the chip time.

Regardless, based on the splits or checkpoints of the race, both runners were pretty close and going back and forth throughout the race. For the first 10 miles, actually, neither runner was in the lead. The runner who finished third was winning, and the two runners in the viral video were second and third. At 19.4 miles, however, the two runners were neck and neck.

By the end of the race, both runners were hurting. I did the math, and their paces over the last 6.8 miles of the race slowed quite a bit from what they were running before.

I have done this race before and, again, know how much this stretch sucks. There is a massive incline on a bridge on the boardwalk. There are very few spectators on the boardwalk and there seem to be only bikes passing you because the race did not block off the course. Because it’s on a boardwalk, it can get either really, really hot or really, really windy. Plus, the last 6 miles of a marathon are infamously difficult.

Thus, I am not saying the two slowed down on this final stretch as an insult. I’m saying it because it gives some context — these two runners had run together for essentially a whole 26.2 miles, and most of us scrolling through social media only have a 20-second clip of a finish that might teach us life lessons.

Upon closer analysis of the finish, from the angle we got it from, I noticed a couple of things that are pretty typical of local marathons. For one, there is a whole lot of cheering.

The person in front could have thought other people were cheering for him. I think this is actually unlikely — if I were in front of someone at the finish line and they were catching me, spectators would say something like “he’s right in front of you!” or “you can catch him!” Family members or friends of that person are going to be screaming their name, which is another warning sign that another runner is right behind you.

I might be overanalyzing this clip and overthinking it, probably significantly more than the person who won and the person who got second are. The results show they’re two 24-year-olds. If I were to guess, they probably both ran competitive distance running in college and are trying to transition to marathon training. Very few people suddenly run 2:43 in the marathon coming from scratch, and at that age, my fitness from the marathon came from residual fitness of work I had done training for 5ks and 10ks in college.

Second, running a 2:43 is cool, but I got the sense that both of these runners can run a lot faster. They ran a challenging course with a lot of hills and only one other person to run with as competition. Besides the isolation, there are a lot of hills. I think on a much faster course, both guys showed they have a lot more in the tank.

Thus, I think a lot of people are taking a lot away from a 20 second clip of the finish when these two were running together for 2 hours and 43 minutes. They trained for months and likely years to run the times they ran.

Would the guy who got second probably have run a bit faster if he had not fist-pumped and celebrated? Probably.

But would he have won? I actually don’t think so. I see that he is slowing a bit at the finish, not out of a celebratory mood, but from fatigue. This is just me, but most people running 2:43 are not ultimately that satisfied with running 2:43. Most people would be thinking “I want to break 2:43,” and the fact that he’s not speeding up to do so isn’t an indication that he didn’t want to — it’s an indication that he couldn’t. Given how the last stretch of the marathon feels, this is very unsurprising. The human body is in so much pain at that point of the marathon that you want it to be over.

Don’t like ads? Become a supporter and enjoy The Good Men Project ad free

Winning and losing often are secondary to getting the most out of yourself for a lot of runners.

The second sign that the second-place guy wouldn’t have won anyway is what happens when he is passed. A lot of runners who care about securing the win and, maybe, not being embarrassed on social media for a long time, would respond and try to match the finish.

There was no reaction on the part of the second-place guy, who was fist-pumping. There was no indication of a jolt of adrenaline to try to match the speed of the guy who was passing him, like most people in that situation would try to do. Again, this is an indication to me not that the second-place guy wouldn’t do what it took to win, but that another person was just better than him that day, and he couldn’t, despite giving it his all.

I don’t want to take anything away from the runner who won. I have had good finishes and kicks at the end of marathons, but never as fast or impressive as the winner. The context of both runners fading and hurting badly at the finish, which I know is the case given how much they slowed down in the final 6.2 miles, makes that all the more impressive. This is just a small snapshot of what is probably their long running careers. From what I saw on the results, the clip, and both being only 24, I would bet that this is not the best marathon either guy is going to run.

However, I think it’s much more complicated than just a life lesson to not celebrate until the finish line and not gloat. I think there are other lessons. For one, it’s never over until it’s over. But another is that you should always be happy with a race if you did your best. Personally, I would be much happier with myself if I ran a personal best and got 100th place than if I got 1st and ran a crappy time.

That is how most of us runners who are not elite marathoners winning the Olympics think — we’re trying to get the most out of ourselves, not trying to edge out some other person whom we have never met before that day. And based on the results and the checkpoints, both runners fed off each other and ran faster because they had each other to run with. I would like to think they both motivated each other and exchanged the lead to break the wind, but I was not there.

I understand this is just how social media works and there is nothing anyone can do about millions of poeple having big takeaways from a 20-second clip. I also know a lot of this tendency is survivorship bias, as human beings — we glorify what the winner does right and what the loser does wrong. We do it in other sports, like football and basketball, and with political elections.

There is a similar viral social media clip of the end of the 2026 Los Angeles Marathon, where winner, Nathan Martin, overtakes the second-place runner in an inspiring sprint finish.

What a lot of people miss in that video, too, is that the second-place runner was led the wrong way on the course and lost anywhere from 10–15 seconds from their final time as a result. For the record, I don’t know if Nathan Martin would have won anyway, because he clearly had a lot more juice than the second-place runner, but I just think context and nuance are important before we take away oversimplified messages from viral moments.

As for the 2026 Delaware Marathon, I just don’t think the guy who was passed at the end deserves to be a social media laughingstock when both runners put forth very impressive efforts and did the best they could.

This finish was a lot more than just a 20-second clip.

—

This post was previously published on MEDIUM.COM.

—